A day after Chris L accuses Trump of stocking his future cabinet with neocons, Liz Cheney endorses
Kamala, and Kamala doesn't reject the endorsement. In fact, MSNBC was drooling over it this morning.
All the failed warmongers in DC are rallying behind Kamala. Sullivan, Blinken, Nuland, Milley, McMaster, the list goes on.
The peacemakers support Trump. They are the blessed ones.
Link: https://x.com/RealTimeNews22/status/1831469649747431764
Replies to: A day after Chris L accuses Trump of stocking his future cabinet with neocons, Liz Cheney endorses
It was only a few short yrs ago that Lizzy was criticizing Harris & her policies.
(no message)
She is far from the only one voting for Kams despite disagreement with her on all major policies.
(no message)
Add the GOP Mayor of Mesa, AZ, as well as Conservative Judge Michael Luttig to that list.
(no message)
Yep. And she still disagrees on policy. This election is not about policy.
(no message)
Im sure millions of voters disagree with you.
(no message)
Correct, not policy, but TDS.
(no message)
Only by the party who nominated him. They turned a cakewalk into a bitter, tightly contested
election.
Chris and I disagree with you. This is not about policy for the Left, but about hatred of Trump.
(no message)
Wrong. Not about hatred but manifest unfitness for office and the threat he poses to the nation. The
TDS that nominated him was the cult like embrace of him by the party base despite the above and despite the fact that there were clearly better candidates with the same positions that he has on the major issues.
So, you agree with us that it is not about policy, then.
As far as threats to the nation, that is just silly. The Democrats have proven they are a far greater threat to the nation. Hatred of Trump is what prevents people from making an objective judgement in this regard.
Really, which D ever pressured his VP to refuse to certify an election that he lost? That should
automatically disqualify him. Elections are always about issues in some macro sense. Here for the never Trumper independent or RINO, there are 2 that override all others, his manifest unfitness to hold the office, and the threat it poses to the nation if he holds it. Nothing else issue wise matters. If your party didn’t have cult like TDS none of this is an issue.
Don't get me wrong. I'm voting 100% on policy. Chris and I were discussing the Left, though.
(no message)
Which policies are those? The 2025 project? or the tax cuts for the very wealthy?
(no message)
Orange claimed to not know what Project 2025 was, but there were parts of it that he disagreed with.
Not just slightly demented and lying, eh?
It's about preservation of the deep state, the bureaucracy and the oligarchy.
(no message)
When I hear the name Cheney I think war criminal
(no message)
Come back and talk to us when she’s national security advisor
You need Trump’s foreign policy to be different from Bush’s. For cognitive consistency.
But Cheney endorsed Harris because she is educated and brave. Trump supporters are never both.
Aside from your false claim, I thought this wasn't about policy?
(no message)
rolleyes. Cheney endorsed Harris because she hates Trump. Not policy, as you said.
(no message)
You keep confusing hatred with opposition to his unfitness for office and to the threat he poses to
the nation. His prior unlawful attempt to remain in office by having Pence refusing to certify the election makes that threat very real.
Belief in the latter is the same as the former.
If you really believed Trump was "unfit" for office for the reasons you state, you would also believe that anyone in the Biden-Harris administration is also unfit for office for politically weaponizing the the justice system and the intelligence community against their political opponents, and lying to the American people about their own candidates and the opposition. But, you don't. Why? Because you hate Trump. If you were objective, you might still make the same voting decision, but you wouldn't be so passionate about the issue. You are very passionate about this, though.
Oh please. Stop bullshitting and conflating. Only 2 people are running for prez that have a chance.
Only one has already proven that he would act illegally to stay in office after losing the presidency. Only one has repeatedly lied about a lawful election being stolen from him by fraud that didn’t happen. Only one has talked about invoking the Insurrection Act to quash protests. Only one has talked about suspension of the Constitution or parts of it. He has already proven himself unfit and a threat to the nation. Harris hasn’t weaponized anything. She didn’t make Orange conspire to overthrow the 2020 election. She didn’t make him take, keep, and conceal classified documents AFTER being told just to give them back. She didn’t make him call up the GA Secretary of State and ask the guy to find him votes. She didn’t make him conceal hush money payments by calling them legal expenses in his business records.Don did that all by his lonesome with his merry men and ladies.
Who will be Kamala's NSA? Lissner? She's beloved by Sullivan, so do you think she'll be a
peacemaker? Needless to say, her record suggests not.
War! War! War!
uh, you don't get an nsa unless you're elected. so.... nobody.
(no message)
You know zero about her. And probably not.
(no message)
So answer the question: who will be Kamala's peacemaking NSA? (If she wins, of course: HT und67).
(no message)
Probably this guy
Long track record, lots and lots of writings.
Not a neocon.
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Advisor_to_the_Vice_President
He was involved in the Libya debacle that Obama regretted, and thought we should've bombed Assad.
I can see why you like him.
Did I say I like him?
I agree with some things he has written, disagree with others. But he is a serious guy, and I respect him.
You should read his book. Or at least just look at the title - if you are against the neocons, you will agree with him more than you think. He advocates for restraint more than many in the blob.
Also there is this list of older essays: https://foreignpolicy.com/author/philip-gordon/
Link: https://www.amazon.com/Losing-Long-Game-Promise-Regime/dp/1250217032
I will review.
(no message)
Does he have to have a music degree? Or, is that only required for economic advisors?
(no message)