DOJ Chief of Public Affairs Nicholas Biase calls Bragg's case "nonsense," "perversion of justice,"
"It’s a travesty of justice.”
“It’s a mockery of justice.”
“The whole thing is disgusting.”
“That’s why he’s[Trump] surging in the polls.”
Let's not forget, he could be in jail by 10:00 am on September 18 for this "nonsense."
Link: https://x.com/stillgray/status/1831701263550996947
Replies to: DOJ Chief of Public Affairs Nicholas Biase calls Bragg's case "nonsense," "perversion of justice,"
If the Dems really try to put him in jail, I fear all hell will break loose. Dems threaten democracy
...by perverting our justice system to prosecute political prisoners. They have to know that is how half the nation will perceive this. Less than half the population of the colonies wanted to fight King George, and yet look what happened.
Maybe he can still run for office, like Eugene Debs did (the last time the Democrats jailed a political opponent). But, I'm glad I'm an old man, and will only be watching this shit from my recliner. The younger generations are getting screwed.
yes but what happens if a judge puts him in jail?
(no message)
You mean how will he govern as president?
If a federal judge puts him in jail, he can just pardon himself.
If a state judge puts him in jail, I'd imagine that SCOTUS could act. I'm not an expert on state appeals regarding state laws to the Supreme Court, and I haven't thought it through fully, but I would imagine that the State would be challenging the sovereignty of the Federal goverment and the validity of the national election, so I would think there would be an issue for SCOTUS to resolve.
So “all hell” will only “break loose” if the “dems put him in jail”?
Good because the dems won’t put him in jail - a judge will.
RIght. Keep deluding yourself that this is just the impartial justice system.
I do fear that people won't wait for SCOTUS to act, or for the election. But, maybe they will.
tell us how the convictions were not impartial.
(no message)
Describe color to a blind man?
(no message)
Beautiful. And apt at this point. Even jim knows what the D's did.
(no message)
I’ll accept your surrender.
(no message)
You fell down a hole you didn't see coming?
(no message)
Specifically, a Democrat judge.
(no message)
A jury convicted him, not the judge.
(no message)
The judge usually sentences, though. He decides whether Trump will go to jail or not.
Also, the judge controls what the jury gets as evidence. Let's not pretend that juries are omniscient and 100% impartial. Would you agree to let Trump get tried for these offenses in West Texas? If not, ask yourself why not.
Is Ned an attorney?…must be just a rumor.
(no message)
Amazing isn’t it? An expert on all disciplines. Facts are not needed. He intuits all knowledge.
(no message)