From last night's debate...Trump still in denial about his not so "Huge" rallies...
like the one in the South Bronx he said drew 25,000 supporters...(see aerial photo)...btw, he never did answer the question about why he killed the bipartisan Immigration Bill.
Replies to: From last night's debate...Trump still in denial about his not so "Huge" rallies...
Well, she had a lot of help from ABC who refused to question her about the many flip flops, found 5
5 times to fact check Trump, and zero to fact check Harris. She lied about things that Biden lied about too. ABC never corrected her. Yes, with all that help she overall won, but Trump won on substantive things.
Tell us what you think she lied about...as for Trump, lying is his native language, and he is fluent
therefore the moderators are required to 'translate' for everyone watching.
Did you notice she didn’t answer are citizens better off now than a few years ago, why it took 3
years to come up with an immigration bill and why the administration kept Trump’s Chinese tariff’s?
Project 2025, national abortion ban, bloodbath and fine people.
Thanks for playing.
'Project 2025' is authored by numerous former Trump admin aides...JDV wrote a forward to the
Project's sponsoring organization (Heritage Foundation) CEO, Kevin Roberts' book, and says there are things in Project 2025 that he likes...DJT flew with Mr. Roberts on a private jet to a Heritage Foundation speaking engagement, yet Trump denies any association with or knowledge of, the Project. Kamala Harris is not lying...DJT is...as always.
National Abortion Ban...Three times DJT was asked if he'd veto such legislation...he refused to do so each time. Note that Project 2025's section on HHS (see link) is adamant that a human being (Person) is defined at the moment of conception, thus justifying, in their minds, a total ban on abortion...with zero concern for innocent women who are forced or coerced into pregnancies they never wanted. Kamala Harris is not lying about the prospect of a National Abortion Ban.
"Bloodbath" and "Fine People on Both Sides"...those are DJT's actual words, and he has a history of using such phrases to motivate his supporters...such as when he told them on Jan. 6th to "Fight Like Hell"...it's called "Stochastic Terrorism". Kamala Harris is not lying when she repeats DJT's own words and his intent when he uses them.
Keep 'em coming, Musky...Trump's entire life is a Lie, so you've got a lot of defending to do.
FYI...here are some former Trump officials who helped draft Project 2025...
https://www.eenews.net/articles/meet-the-ex-trump-officials-who-helped-draft-project-2025/
Link: https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf
You don't even know what's in it because, like everyone else, you haven't read it.
It's 900 pages long. You're just repeating talking points.
I just gave Musky …and you …the Project 2025 section related to
his abortion ban denial…which I read before posting. Have you read it?…did you not see the verbiage claiming that Personhood, in their eyes, begins at conception thereby justifying a total ban on abortion…again, in their minds?…or their fixation on states reporting about miscarriages?
“Project 2025” is a dystopian manifesto for extreme conservatives, and even DJT knows America would never accept it knowingly…that’s why he goes to such lengths denying association with it.
You're commenting we haven't read it when clearly you haven't read it.
Try again. We keep posting it for you to read because many of us have gone through it.
Link: This is it for you to read. Some of us have actually read portions of it. Now you can too.
No kidding I haven't read it genius. I'm too busy commmenting on the football program.
You haven't read it either. No one has. It's 900 pages. I bet Harris and Old Joe hasn't read it either. DJT already said he hasn't read it. Nobody has. All the left is doing is cherry picking parts force fed to them from some lefty blogger who hasn't read it either.
Wrong again. Keep em coming.
(no message)
Explain what you think is wrong, and why...
(no message)
Research it. They’ve all been discussed on here at length.
(no message)
Can't defend your own claims?...I gave you my explanations for each of your claims, but you won't?
...you're either too lazy, or incapable...maybe both...par for the course.
No American troops in combat zones unless she is disregarding Syria and Iraq.
(no message)
I'm guessing she was thinking of sustained combat zones like Afghanistan...as for other locations
like Syria and Iraq, whenever our military is close to unsettled regions with opponents like ISIS, there will be isolated conflicts, but not anything that might be called an ongoing "War Zone"...dangerous, or sure...always...but KH was likely alluding to the scale of U.S. military involvement.
...from the attached article...
----------------
"And as of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone, in any war zone around the world, the first time this century," Harris said.
That's not quite true.
The U.S. maintains nearly 1,000 troops on bases in Syria and another 2,500 in Iraq, according to the U.S. Department of Defense. In Syria, U.S. troops are stationed to help prevent a resurgence of the Islamic State group. They play a similar role in Iraq, where they also help disrupt Iran's influence and supply lines to various militias.
--------------
I'm not sure that those deployments would get described as part of an historical "War" at this point in time.
Link: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/09/11/trump-harris-debate-us-troops-combat-zones/75171915007/
“I’m guessing what she’s thinking” now you know what she’s thinking. Hilarious
(no message)
TC, Trump lost like 62-0. Refs gave him +5 mins & he ranted about eating pets and the size of his...
(no message)
Losers blame the refs. He lost because unlike her he wasn’t prepped for shit that was obvious. He
also lost cause he didn’t respect her as an opponent. Sound familiar?
Trump would have lost to NIU last night. He was that bad.
(no message)
Either candidate is not fit to run this country. Worse presidential choices in my 50 yrs. of voting.
(no message)
One is a Convicted Felon, a Rapist, A Multi-Time Fraud, Amoral and Unethical Malignant
Narcissist who sides with our worst enemy over our military and civilian intelligence personnel, while producing no benefits for well over 90% of our population...the other is none of those things, while being part of an administration that passed landmark bipartisan legislation benefitting ALL Americans, regardless of party affiliation and standing strong against our enemies.
Not sure why you think they are equally poor choices...care to explain?
She may not be a criminal but she helped cover up Biden health issues, flip flops, speaks in
word salad and giggles when she doesn't have an answer. I know that's nothing major but I
don't think she is intellectually presidential material. I don't like EITHER candidate. I don't
want to vote for EITHER candidate.
delete
(no message)
.
(no message)
She answered nothing, do you understand how debates work?
(no message)
Cain't hardly believe she whupped Don bad as she did, eh Paw?
(no message)
Agree. She is vacuous.
(no message)
Right from the handshake "I'm Kamala Harris [and I'm here to kick your ass!]" she dominated Donald.
(no message)
She did no such thing and you know it.
She ‘s a border and foreign policy idiot.
VP's don't set policy or manage anything...just ask Mike Pence...and as far as the Border is
concerned, the only "Czar" is Alejandro Mayorkas...Kamala Harris' role has been to speak with certain countries about why their citizens are seeking refuge in the U.S...and wrt Foreign Affairs, she is the Emissary for our President when requested...otherwise, she just needs to be available in case Joe Biden can't perform his duties as President, and cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate.
You should know this by now.d
Donald ranted, lied, cited conspiracy theories & 8 years later still HAS NO PLAN. Kamala routed him.
(no message)
Kamala has a plan…just like the border.
(no message)
The steam coming out of his ears when she called him on that one was priceless. Just let him talk
and he will lose. She had him pissed and off theme all night.
In that way she won, but on the issues, not asked about enough Trump won.
(no message)
In that way she won, but on the issues, not asked about enough Trump won.
(no message)
What issues exactly? Reproductive rights? The immigration bill he killed? Healthcare?
(no message)
Healthcare was his worst moment on policy. He’s had 8 years to come up with a plan. He claimed to
have “concepts” that he couldn’t even name. He was also lame on the other two issues. That wasn’t the moderators. Again, lack of preparation for the obvious.