Harris spokesman claims asking about D's dangerous Trump rhetoric is "incredibly dangerous".
They have helped to incite two separate unhinged liberals to attempt an assassination of Donald Trump, and when called on it, they claim those asking are "incredibly dangerous.
You can't make this stuff up.
It's like talking to a 2nd grader....."I know you are, but what am I" over and over again.
Harris is utterly unfit for the White House. This administration is utterly unfit, incompetent, and driving a wedge into our country further and further every day.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/media/jean-pierre-scorched-utterly-heinous-response-defending-biden-harris-rhetoric-calling-trump-threat
Replies to: Harris spokesman claims asking about D's dangerous Trump rhetoric is "incredibly dangerous".
Trump losing? Flip the script. Tell bigger lies! Spread more racial hate! Control the women!
(no message)
The divide between men and women is far greater today than that between white and black folk.
I go to a racially mixed gym outside the D everyday and if you closed your eyes and listened to the conversations you would never be able to detect any racial disharmony.
By contrast, the majority of women I know have tremendous disdain for Trump.
Haley or DeSantis would have cleaned up this cycle.
MAGA's core is more misogynist than racist.
He is a clear and present danger to the republic
He also needs to be defeated with the ballot, not the bullet. That is the position of all rational people.
Not sure why this is hard for you to understand.
No matter how many times you say this it is not true.
Exactly how is Trump going to circumvent the checks and balances in our government?
Your hysteria is rooted in paranoia.
There will be neither checks nor balances in the second Trump exec branch
He will surround himself with sycophants. Last time he hired pros - all of whom are now horrified by him - and he will not make the same mistake twice.
Also, a GOP Senate (which is likely) will be supine.
You're acknowledging the Deep State -lifers loyal to Obama and opposed to Trump short circuiting him
And I have understood from the start that this is your actual fear with trump. Your buds will be unemployed, and your DC options may disappear.
Let us hope so.
Chris, what you have described is perfectly legal.
You have still not explained how he destroys the Republic.
I don’t think the American People would allow that to happen.
I'm sorry if you are too thick to understand this.
But explaining basic things to internet fuckwits is not my job.
Synopsis of 94's concern re Trump: He will actually drain the swamp this time and they won't be able
to fuck him over again.
Also, what they did to him may come back to them.
Yes, he’s a threat to the liberal agenda, nothing more.
Chris wants us to believe that 300+ million Americans will
just allow Trump to destroy the democracy.
He can’t explain how. He just condescends and insults.
You have explained nothing. Your intellectual bullying may play with your students.
Not with me.
You did nothing to refute what I said.
I’m better educated and far more successful than you.
That’s a fact.
Grow up.
“ I’m better educated and far more successful than you.”
Sure you are, grampa. Where are your keys?
You still haven’t refuted what I said. You are just blustering.
Sorry, Grandma it’s true.
You are a professor at a second tier poly sci department
trying to lord it over everybody else.
Yet you can’t explain your simple paranoid declaration of
“Threat to the democracy”.
This language incites violence. Here is a CSPAN caller praising the shooters for "defending
the country." You and other Dems know what you're doing, Chris. You clearly want him taken out by any means necessary and are inciting people to try and do it with your "threat to the Republic" language.
Link: https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1836444033364955162
well, he’s a convicted criminal, rapist, racist, sides with Putin, believes he should be immune from
prosecution for his crimes and more.
How is it you don’t see this as a clear and present danger to America?
Jim, you repeat this every time someone posts something that you disagree with.
Exactly how is Trump going to circumvent the checks and balances in our government?
BTW he was not convicted of rape.
Putin has endorsed Harris. So has Cheney.
So has Taylor Swift. You’re in questionable company, Jim.
He's a one trick dog faced pony soldier
(no message)
If Trump sided with Putin, why did Putin invade Ukraine under Obama and Biden?
(no message)
I would love to hear Jim’s response.
(no message)
Haha, see below on cue. It was a tad bit underwhelming.
(no message)
Your question makes no sense and your premise is loony toons
(no message)
Jim, answer the question if you can. It is direct and logical.
(no message)
The attached article provides a good summary, but as to Putin's annexation of Crimea while Obama
was President, he and Biden supported the ouster of Ukraine's corrupt and Russia-friendly President and outraged Putin, so he struck Crimea...later, when Trump was in office, Putin no longer had to wage war to get what he wanted, as Trump was doing his bidding by trying to weaken both Ukraine and NATO......also, a war effort would force DJT's hand...either show weakness and do nothing, or support Ukraine and inflict damage on Russia..not good choices....subsequently, with Biden in office and supporting Ukraine again, Putin's only option was to invade Ukraine while assuming it would be as easy as the Crimea "Special Operation"...he obviously miscalculated.
Link: https://apnews.com/article/russia-putin-ukraine-crimea-seizure-8245aec572fb71236febfa8735c42879
Abject bullshit. And unconstitutional.
Sorry Cole, but your guy is a cancer. And he needs to lose.
AND political violence is always and everywhere unacceptable.
AND free speech is pretty important.
Is unfair prosecution and using the govt agencies against him off the table for you too?
(no message)
Look at Jim below. He said the 28% of Dems who wish Trump was assassinated are "rational."
You know exactly what you're doing. You're right on the edge of a First Amendment violation but not quite over it, and you and other Dems are hoping more crazies take a shot.
No That Is Not What He Said - dipstick!
(no message)
Sorry dipshit. But I believe in free speech.
(no message)
Your insult indicates that you have anger management issues.
(no message)
Unlike Hillary.
(no message)
Rasmussen: 28% of Dems surveyed wish Trump had been shot and killed.
You just called 1 in 4 Democrats irrational.
Link: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/hldwed8a-poll-shocker-28-democrats-think-america-better-if-trump
Trump losing? Use polls to de-legitimize elections.
(no message)
Or you’re calling the 28% more rational.
(no message)
The guys who hid deep staters to retain control are obviously the problem, and
It is ludicrous to call Trump a C&PD when we have 4 yrs of evidence to the contrary.
What Trump really is, is a C&PD to the Left’s plans for “transformative change” to the country that we love.
D’s use of these hyperbolic claims has directly inspired two separate murder attempts. Looks like you’re refusal to ever admit a mistake is shared by the HarrisHandlers, and it is going to lead to a third.
The message from the WH is clear: try again.
Evil.
"deep staters." No better way to announce stupidity.
(no message)
Let's see:constant detrimental leaks, spying on the POTUS, general secretly confabing with China
Chris, you may be able to say the WORDS that I am being stupid, but trust me, it is YOU who are being stupid.
Perhaps you have a long term memory issue?
A recent poll found that 24% of Democrats believe it would have been better if Trump was killed.
And now they found explosives at the Nassau Colosseum, where his rally is today. I don’t know what more you can say to convince people that we are in a low-grade Civil War with the violence primarily being waged from the left.
These people are sick
(no message)
Those people have embraced evil fully after a steady diet of hate. They are now addicted to it..
(no message)
Another in a long line of idiots in this administration.
(no message)