Regardless of what you may believe regarding the issue. This guy is right regarding the coverup. If the Sheriff is as wrong as some people claim, then bring it out and see were the cards fall. If he is wrong, he will pay the price. So why does the LWRM pass on the chance to show up one of their favorite targets? They report all dirt they can find on him, why not make him look real bad and expose him on this issue?
Link: Scandal
(no message)
name on UHND than LTNDFAN.
(no message)
(no message)
Sheriff in AZ wanting him to drop everything, Afghanistan, the economy, creating jobs, etc. to answer a phony, trumped-up charge by the Republicans. Are you stupid or what?
to join your team and become a blindly lead Obama Zombie. They are also known as OBOTs, short for Obama robots.
Oh wait, maybe not, becoming a Socialist or a Commie, Too expensive, too painful. Besides, my health care insurance does not cover frontal lobotomies or brain removals. They would have to remove over 3/4 to make me into an Obama sheep like you. No thanks. I am not going through the process of becoming someone like you, incapable of intelligent thought or even reading a post and understanding the issue I presented.
You are the: OK, stop, I am not going to lower myself to your level.
I do have to ask the question: are you mentally capable of reading a post, understanding it, and responding to the issues in it in an intelligent manner? Sorry to ask, but your posts indicate that you are not.
(no message)
actually you caught me. I just made up the whole story to keep you entertained. There is no Sheriff Joe, or Barack Obama, in fact there no place called Kenya. Its just a story I made up just for you. So, just sit back in your rocking chair, take your meds, and calm down. Soon you will nod off and have nice dream that the big bad Obama charactar that I made up is gone the USA will be saved.
he's a homo stuck in the south. The guy's probably getting gay bashed as I type this shit. Speaking of shit, have you read any of MAS's posts today? "Good Lawd" is that mother fucker a pussified twat.
(no message)
See my post on Valhamma.
Next up, the President needs to address those that think he is an Iranian spy. That he hasn't done so is a scandal.
if he had proof of his eligiblity, he could present it in the AM at virtually no cost or time spent. Instead he chooses to spend millions to avoid presenting evidence to a court. Instead he chose to spend his time and more money to create obvious forgeries. Maybe that makes sense to you to spend millions of dollars in legal fees, have people create forgeries. It does not compute for me. I would just reach in my drawer right next to me, pull out the docs, and present them. The only logical reason for not doing so is that he can't.
By both parties?
the only manipulation is being done by the LWRM. I am not aware of either political party pushing the issue. In fact, they are both virtually silent on the issue.
I believe that the Dems are content with the situation. They have a DEM in the WH and they do not care if he belongs there Is not. I think that also do not want to see an investigation because it will be very embarrassing for them as Nixon was to the Rs. And justifiably so in both cases. They both make their parties look bad.
I think that the Rs are afraid of the issue for fear of being attacked as I am on this board.
I have heard other reasons that I cannot verify for why the issue is not investigated. I cannot prove this, I do not claim them as my views, I throw them out there as views that I have heard. Congress or the SCOTUS will not touch the issue out fear of race riots. Congress will not act due their handling of the Electoral College proceedings.
The LWRM blacks out the story because if the facts were made known to the people, their favorite Socialist would go down.
If a few states do that, it could cause him to severely lose the popular vote, regardless of electoral votes. Wanna talk about a political shit storm.
Obama to prove that he is eligible to be on the ballot. To disregard the complaint signed by 250 County residents would be a disaster for him. If he has evidenece that is valid, show it. Spending millions to avoid it is very telling.
However, my question is about the press. They hate hime so much, whypass ont his chance to make hime look stupid and cover up hi investigation results. If they think they are invlaid, put them on the front page, show him to be a fraud.
He'll use that as I hypothesize below. If not, then shortly before the election, I think AZ will move to decertify then, and other states will follow.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
do you stop and think about whether maybe they're not the ones that are off-base? Layer on top of that the fact that MANY of the people that are lambasting you for this nonsense are conservative Republicans that can't stand Obama. And yet, you're still convinced that your position is correct and can't understand why people would be calling you crazy.
Also, having gotten the reaction that you have, don't you think maybe it's time, as Jack Nicholson said in "As Good As It Gets", to "go sell crazy somewhere else, we're all stocked up here."
You can obviously feel free to continue down this path here, but consider whether you're doing any good in trying.
related to the press. I did not mention the merits of the case.
I simply asked and the article that I linked asks: why is the press taking a pass on reporting this story on Joe? They attack him every chance they get, Why cover up this story. Wht don't they go front page with it and his bogus evidence and make a fool of him. Use their power to make him look stupid. His posse is a joke to them, so why are they hiding the story instead of using it attack their favorite punching bag?
Since you raised the issue and I did not. I feel the only reason that people, including Rs avoid the issue is that they are not familiar with the issue. The posts relative to the isssue by most of the posters indicate that they are not up to speed on the issue. That is what the LWRM wants, people to be ignorant of the issue. If this issue had been raised regarding a R candidate it would be covered 24 hours a day by the press. I say that if 100% of the USA was up to speed on this issue, the usurper would have been locked up along time ago.
Other posters bring up repetative issues that are boring to me. I say, that is their right.
Really, this is another way to say "It must be true". Just saying, those "on your side" think you are crazy for going on about this. It might be time to self assess.
hear it.
Sheriff Joe is a bigot, and you are an easy mark.
Link: Here you go, Mr. Mensa.
defending the left. Some say they are on the George Soros payroll. I do not know that for a fact, so I will not make the accusation. Nobody who know about Snopes ever uses them to support their case regarding any issue or even bothers to go to their site.
Aside from that: There is nothing in your post relative to the issue that I raised. I asked why is the LWRM passing on a chance to deliver a knockout blow to one of their worst enemies. They nail him on every other issue, why not go get him now, report on this story and really make him look bad? Please don't tell me its because they like him all of a sudden. Its too early to tell, but my guess is that it won't be long before they attack him on someother story and they still will ocver this one up. My question is why?
Ask yourself why you are so quick to believe the good sheriff's words (and right now they are just words), and just as quick to discount every other piece of evidence presented to you.
Link: I guess Fox News is also in on this conspiracy
I am describing your behavior.
Aside from that, you just proved that you are totally ignorant of the issue. This "expert" is not on record as swearing under oath to the opinions credited to him in the article. More importantly, this individual backtracked a week later after seeing more expert testimony making him look stupid and stated that he could not stand by the FNC article. FNC has never to my knowledge reported that their so called expert recanted his initial thoughts when confronted with more facts.
Sorry, I am not insane. However, unlike you, I am informed.
While Jean Claude Tremblay backed tracked a bit on the certainty of his conclusion, his conclusion remained the same. In his post on his own blog where he backtracks, he concludes: "In my humble opinion, what I see about how the PDF is built does not prove any unusual falsification. If there was tampering, we must look elsewhere and not how the PDF was constructed."
Jean Claude Tremblay
Further, he provides a link to another article here where "this process was explained by other experts better than [him]".
opinions that had been expressed. He is not backtracking a little, he refutes the FNC story. Also note that these opinions have been refuted by sworn testimony. Also note that none of the opinions that you refer to are sworn to. Also note that no expert has provided sworn testimony to counter the numerous sworn testimonies declaring the documents to be fabricated on a computer. They also know the details of the computer, the operating system, and where it is located. They also know the time when the forgery was uploaded to the WH site. They also have a person of interest. Perhaps you could explain why the WH team had two different versions posted on 04/27/2011 at times during the day? Perhaps you could also explain how the WH got confused and at one time posted the wrong short form COLB on their site. They posted one made by one of the fake COLB debunkers that he had made to show easy it was to make a fake COLB like the one online at fakecheck. Soetoro's boys got confused and loaded that homemade version on the WH site. They can't even get their fakes straight from other fakes.
Sorry dude. I am not insane. I am informed, and obviously, you are not.
You also did not even realize that the one link that you provided is to an article debunking the fake BC. If, you are going to provide a link, you should read the article or maybe just read the title, that should have been a clue.
Graphics pros challenge Obama birth certificate
Layers of images found in released computer document raise doubts
Since then, experts have provided sworn testimony that the doc is a forgery made on a computer. This sworn testimony is unchallenged by any sworn testimony, only by bloggers like you. I will believe the experts willing to swear to their opinions.
You are a fool. You clearly did not read the article. While the headline states what you state, the entire article runs completely counter to that headline. But I am glad you are so informed.
No where in the article does it state that anyone is willing to go the record and say that the doc is valid, let alone make that statement under oath. You do know that WND is a pro-birther site. Go to the main page on WND.com and look it over.
Let me know when you find an expert willing to go on the record under oath and counter the numerous experts who have made sworn affidavits stating that what was posted at the WH site was generated by compiling data from various other docs and is not a scanned paper doc.
I linked a pro-birther site that has an article with statements like:
- "While there may be other challenges to the document’s authenticity that bear further scrutiny, it appears that the “layer argument” can be easily explained."
- "Graphic artists who addressed the issue on blogs and Web forums point out that the format in which Obama’s document was released, Portable Document Format, or PDF, is composed of multiple images.
Tests on other PDF images produce an effect similar to the multiple layers extracted from Obama’s document."
- "The PDF viewer, Cartan explained, “then takes the different objects, decompresses them, and reproduces a fairly accurate copy of the original (much bigger) image again.”
“None of this is an indication of forgery,” Cartan said. “They just wanted to save a few bucks for the bandwidth, it seems.”"
- "Nathan Goulding, National Review’s chief technology officer, confirmed that “scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”"
release. In fact the next day. It was within an hour of the release that oddities where being reported. Then they tried to switch the doc. When that was noticed, they put they first one posted back up. I downloaded the first, I did not get a copy of the second one, it was not up for very long. Does it not give you pause that they had two different docs posted the same day. This was at the stage when only the layering was being reported. It took a while for the real damning evidence to be detected. I am not going to detail it all for you. If you want to see some it, watch the Sheriff's press conference. I believe the people willing to make sworn statements and have said that they will testify in court to what they know. You choose to believe who you want, it does not matter to me. Like I said, if any expert does ever decides to counter the sworn affidavits on file with the Sheriff, let me know. I like to keep abreast of issues from all sides.
Somewhere, someone is making a fortune selling tin foil.
a handful of people aware of the issue. Now, it is 40% of the nation. He should have been forthright back in 2008 and put the issue to rest back then. I don't understand how he feels that it is worth millions of dollars to create a situation where 40% of the nation now doubts his origins. He could have put this issue to rest for under a 100.00 back then. I do not understand his strategy. I have evidence of meeting all of the qualifications in the drawer next to me. If it were me, I would just present them as others have done. It is his handling of the issue that makes him appear guilty. Why does he do that to himself?
If it appears that Obama is slipping in the polls below the 35% approval point, which if gas prices continue in their current direction and he doesn't take action will likely happen (I think he will take action "in response to the requests of the public and in furtherance of bi-partisan politics" - he's viewing that as an ace up his sleeve)
Sometime closer to the election, this issue will be picked up by the national media. They'll investigate, give this a "fair hearing" and determine that the birth certificate is real. This will drag out over several weeks, and it will stir up Obama's base, the white apologists and other minorities.
...and, like many lawsuits that you never want to see happen, just the discovery alone will be damaging.
That's all the media will need.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
if it is a forgery, you have to ask why. The only answer is that he an illegal alien. That creates another problem, which is why I disagree with those who say that we just focus on the other issues and vote him out. What if it a forgery and he is an illegal alien, do you want an illegal alien imposter to walk out of the WH with all of out national secrets? Do you want to set a precedent that anyone can sneak into the country and say I am running for POTUS without any evidence to support his claim? OBL's kid could sneak across the border and run for POTUS under that precedent.
Which makes it even stupider (more stupid?) that right wing whackos like LTNDFAN are making a big deal out of it.
(no message)
Mostly because there is nothing about which to be informed.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The LWRM never passes a chance to bum rap Joe or anyone else they don't Like. Why do they pass on this golden opportunity to make him look bad?
And this is so far out there it isn't worth responding to.
Who do you think LTNDFAN is helping?
press. It seems that you do not have a valid answer to the question.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
that would enlighten me. I do have my own opinion. I do not deny that. I have stated it. I like to see if there are other opinions or theories out there. Tonto had one, perhaps he is right. Time will tell. I have had conversations with Liberal friends who countered my thoughts with opinions or facts that caused me to change my view on some issues.
I am just in a way picking the brains of the folks out there. If anyone has facts or serious theories, I am open to them and I hope to learn from them.
Barack Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States.
Barack ABM is a Christian.
And while we are at it, JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald. Acting alone. There was no conspiracy.
Not one thing that you said makes a lick of sense:
There is not evidence of any kind anywhere that Obama is a NBC. If you have any proof of that, bring it on. Obama won't or can't.
What does: Barack ABM is a Christian even mean?
If you want to believe that Oswald killed JFK. Go to it man. I don't care what you believe regarding that. Just keep that tinfoil wrapped around your head dude.
I recommend "Case Closed" by Gerald Posner.
Thanks for the recommendation, but I have read so much about it, I am kinda burned out on that for now.
There are too many factors for me to consider buying into the Oswald theory. Too long of list to depend typing it all herein. You can go nuts reading books on the subject. For everyone that says it was Oswald , there is another that says it was not.
I just finished a book written by one of my high school friend's father. It is called Double Cross by Chuck Giancana. Its his story of growing up as the brother of the Chicago Godfather. It was a great read for me because I was at their house the night a certain event occurred that is told in the book. The story tells a very believable version of what happened and why. Not just to JFK, but also to Bobby Kennedy,and Marlyn Monroe.
Aside from that, I know the training that he went through as a Marine. I have seen his scorecard. He qualified the same as I did, a sharpshooter. I also coached on the rifle range. The training he went through was not as people make it out to be. He missed the car with the first shot and two hits seconds apart at at moving target. Does not compute. I have tried and seen a USMC team member firing a bolt action rifle far Superior to the piece of junk that Oswald was said to have used. From the time of the first shot to the end of the third shot you cannot recycle the bolt and reacquire the target and get off three rounds that first. The team shooter was shooting at a bulls eye not even moving.
Then you have to explain the bullet on the stretcher, almost intact. That being said than, where did the bullet fragments removed from the governor come from.
You also have to discount the words of the closest witnesses. The governor and his wife. They both said they heard JFK gasp when he was shot in the neck, then the gov turned and he was shot. The bullet could not be traveling that slow that he would have time to turn before he was struck if it was the same bullet. She stuck by her story until she died. Why would they lie?
You also have to discount the Lyndon Johnson tapes released in the mid nineties. He is coercing the people that wants on the Warren Commision. Not just to serve but instructing them what they will put in their report. In fact, they are to do any investigation, just report what he told them which is that Oswald acted alone. I heard that tape myself when it released.
(no message)
I disagree. Three years ago, only a handful of Hillary supporters questioned his eligibility. Like most folks, I thought that they were nuts. Now, due to Obama's handling of the issue, and in spite of the press blackout on the issue, 40% of the USA doubt his eligibility. I would suggest that the only reason that the number is that low is due to the media blackout. IMHO, the posting on this board would indicate that there are very few people here even somewhat knowledgeable of the issue. That is the goal of the LWRM. Keep the the folks ignorant of the issue. That is why Joe's investigation results are not reported but they attack him on all other fronts. If the press even had a remote chance of making him look bad by reporting the story, it would be front page 24 hours a day.
they'd be all over it. But they're not, which speaks volumes.
Where is the WSJ? Where is the Washington Times? Where are the other right-leaning major national newspapers?
is from the Washington Times. That is what prompted me to make the post. Did you click the link and read the article and the source?
Perhaps in the circles in which you run, but not out here. There are millions of LTNDs and Baron von Zeros and you have one party that caters directly to these people.
(no message)
Maybe because it's a stupid issue that doesn't matter in any way.
As stated by lawyers on this board, even IF (and that if is a chance of about 0.00001%) it is a forgery, that doesn't necessarily mean he would lose a constitutional challenge.
I love how they point out how Pravda is reporting on the story. Yeah, Pravda has no reason to stir up the hornets nest on this. None.
Anyone even discussing this is a crackpot. You included.
(no message)
Condsider this: Whe Hillary supports first raised this issue, only a handful of Americans gave it any validity. Myself icluded, when i first heard about, I said sound like sour grapes from the Hillary folks. However, since then the people wantinf to see an investigation has grown to 40%. I do not se how that is good for Obama. maybe he thinks so, but if he does, I do not understand his logic. If he was able to, he could have this whole issue to rest on 2008.
Consider this: if the Sheriff and his team are wackos, why does the press cover that up. The press hates Joe. Here is their perfect chance to attack him and make him look bad. Why not, they attack him every chance they get, why the blackout on this issue? Do you think that are trying to help the Rs? Not likely. They blackout is there to keep the people uninformed. If a R was the target of the issue, would it be blacked out?
My opinion is that they know that their only chance is to keep the people from paying attentino to the issue and informed. If all Americans were up to speed on the issue, Obama is done.
you are frustrated by your inability to make an meaningful response.
My question and the purpose if you read what I said was why is the press passing a chance to attack Joe? They never pass on any other opportunity. I did not raise the issue of the merits evidence that he presented. Here is the LWRM's chance to knock out their favorite punching bag and they pass. The question is why? Do they like him all of a sudden?
If any lawyers, who are acquantined with all of the details of the case have presented opinions as you say they have I have not seen them post that opinion, let alone see anyone any where in the country antone willing to state under oath to what you describe. However, I did not raise the debate of the issue of eligiblity, I raised the issue of how the press was acting contrary to their normal routine.
Even the press is tired of Joe and his stupidity. That's why they aren't bothering to cover it.
Hell, why isn't Fox News making a bigger issue out of it? Because it isn't one.
chance to make him look bad because they are just tired of him and his stupidity.
OK, lets test that theory: If your theory is correct we will see any more attacks on Joe in the press because of the reason that you stated. However, if they do continue to attack him on other issues and ignore this one, then your theory is incorrect, totally bogus,and that there must be another reason for their not reporting the story being reported around the world except in this country.
If any lawyers on this board, who are aware of the details of the case and the evidence that Joe presented and posted those opinions here with anything to support that opinion I have not seen the post. If there is someone on the board that has seen or has sworn evidence to counter what the Sheriff has presented, I would love to see it. I like to keep abreast of all sides of issues. Again, I did not raise the issue of the merits of the evidence. I only questioned the unusual manner of the press coverage.
I cannot comment on your statement regarding coverage by FNC. I hardly watch them any more. I can tell you that the Canadian press has stated that they compiled letters from well known anchors from several different networks in the USA who Stating that they have been ordered not to discuss the issue. Lou Dobbs didn't listen. He mentioned it one night. That night shots were fired into his home barely missing his wife, and he was fired the next day. But, who would believe Dobbs and the police who responded to the shots. Must have been a coincidence.
I think not.
dummy.
(no message)
I didn't mention race. That is the usual liberal copout whne they cannot address the issue. Is that your explanation as to why the press is passing on a chance to make Joe look bad. They nail him on every other move he makes. Why not get him now and really make him look bad?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
for asking the question I did. Then have the courtesy of having a valid reponse. Otherwise, you have done nothing but degrade yourself and proved that you are ignorant of the subject.
I could simply say 'dinosaurs' and that would be response enough. There is plenty of material to beat these stupid fucking liberals over the head with. Fuck, Bams spent a kabillion dollars and our economy is no better than when Bush left office...the fucker has done more to take away personal freedoms than any other President in my lifetime...he implemented a HC system that nobody wanted and fed us a line of BS about it that even Bush would have been incapable of concocting... and you want to put on your tin foil hat and bitch about bigfoot? Why?
Your life hasn't changed a bit.
So you only worry about the loss of personal freedoms only if it affects you?
That's rhetorical, BTW. Don't bother responding. I can't imagine that anyone would want to read your fence riding horseshit.
Denver airport, 11 AM. Drinks and more, perhaps?
Now, let's hear about the personal liberties the Negro has taken from you.
Do we really need to rehash NDAA, woman's health vs Catholic organizations, the provision in the HC bill at all citizens must be insured...? Do we need to go over all of that?
I get it. You don't fucking care. As long as it's only the Jews, right?
Nice play to go with the racism angle though. I don't like Obama because he's black. You nailed it.
Fucking A. It's like LT got the right side of a brain, you got the left and then somebody came along and stomped on both.
Has the Negro taken that avenue of proclaiming your oneness with the Holy One, as well?
With the rate at which these personal liberties are disappearing, it's no wonder you can't list all of them. Or any of them, for that matter.
(no message)
Just as I would agree that mandating non-drivers shall carry auto insurance would be onerous, I will be similarly outraged when dead people are mandated to carry health insurance. With regards to the silliness over the contraception debate, it's helpful to keep in mind that most of those Catholic employees are paid, in part, through profit generated by the countless prescriptions written for birth control by docs at the respective Catholic hospitals and clinics.
I dislike that money is taken from me to subsidize folks with no ambition on public assistance. However, I'm not quite the drama queen to proclaim that my personal liberties are violated by virtue of that. Like the others, you're emoting, which leads you to make moronic statements like no president has taken away personal freedoms as this one. Now that reveals a genuine ignorance of history. Figures.
I suppose I should know better than to argue with the guy that thought JSR was a goonie.
Of course not. It's enjoyable to ask the logical question, which is followed by the obligatory hemming and hawing and "Well, if you can't figure it out, I'm not going to tell you" brilliance.
Just please name the personal freedoms that are being taken from Americans. I'm begging you. Thus far, it's a mandate with precedence all across this fruited plane and the birth control nonsense. Is that all you got?
Extra points for invoking Nazi comparisons into your emoting.
This would all go quicker if you would stop making shit up.
"I already told you. I'm not going to tell you again."
But, you know what's interesting? Go back and read your first reply. That's the one in which you declared no one would be interested in reading my posts. Guess who responded? It took you less than two hours to read and respond. And respond. And respond. Why does your time matter so little to you that you will respond to someone you have declared is not worth your time?
I mentioned the hc bill, the so called women's health issue and NDAA. How does that translate to I'm not going to tell you? Each of these are clear examples of where the gov't is infringing on people's personal freedoms.
It's only a matter of time before they start putting us into internment camps.
At what point do you tuck your tail between you legs and stop posting for another 9 months?
Obama giving the green light to assassinate an American citizen. God bless him, even Cheeks had the intellectual honesty to admit that it's troubling. Unfortunately, Da Meatheads fell mostly silent on that one, though I would assume the silence was due to the fact that they supported the action but didn't want to give credit to the Half-Negro.
I think it's fair to say that if an American decides to join al quaeda, he pretty much forfits his citizenship and his life. Ashes to ashes, fucker.
You're a Meathead. A nice fellow, but a Meathead.
Please explain the COnstitutional basis for concluding that an American citizen forfeits his due process rights when he is alleged to be a member of a terrorist organization. Does that include domestic terror organizations?
Really? The guy was a known leader in al quaeda conducting terror operations in Yemen. To make it clear for you, jasper, Al Awlaki wasn't an alleged al quaeda member. He got caught just like many other enemy combatants.
It's amazing, but we still retain due process rights. All of us. Even alleged terrorists who are American citizens. Even domestic terrorists.
I expect you to support something like this and have no reasoned defense to offer. What's far more troubling are the lefties who pride themselves as guardians of civil liberties who remained remarkably silent.
a little term called treason. The punishment for treason is death. I know, I know...the dude wasn't convicted in absentia. Unfortunately, highly complicated drone attacks like that are very time sensitive. If the order wasn't given at the time, the douche could have escaped.
Also, there wasn't anything alleged about the guy. He was a high ranking al quaeda official and one of their top recruiters. Please stop with the ridiculousness. Have a good evening.
You could apply the same standard to some domestic Neo-Nazi group members who plot to overthrow the federal government and run to Canada or Mexico. They might get away as well if we don't assassinate them, particularly if they are underground members. Plus, the penalty for treason is death anyways, whether it be rendered in a court of law, by a military tribunal or by a drone. Yes.
Talk about contortions.
name one neo nazi group or domestic terror group that poses a threat to national security? Al Awlaki did pose a threat to national security and was a member of al quaeda. I'm not sure why you're feigning outrage to his killing.
damn it!
faggot?
I see it now. MAS singing..."It's raining men, hallelujah, it's raining men....."
Sweet Jesus. I think I can bring your mind back.
Wipe that tear from your cheek, now, you hear?
cunt. How's that for simple, faggot?
(no message)
nothing. Now go fag off somewhere else.
Did you get in a few good shots before the aliens probed you?
Most queers do.
That's one of the reasons I steer clear of priests and the Bravo network. Not to mention Natalie Merchant concerts.
It's interesting that you consistently reference homosexual acts and other mens' penises. If we were to calculate it, it would become apparent that you think about homosexual sex a minimum of two times per day. Why do you think homosexual sex is on your mind that often?
I'm sure you fantasize about your male students catching you in the shower with your life partner, Sandusky style.
Also, Kirtland AFB is in NM, dumb ass. When I saw something "unexplained", it was in Dugway, UT. I take it Geography isn't your strong suit, yes? Take a remedial course and get back to us.
Again with the homosexual imagery. At what age did this fixation develop? Was this before or after the beating?
If you'll recall, Skippy, I was talking about a time when my father lived in Albuquerque and saw something in the sky, after which you shared your little story. I will admit that the version of your story I saw on South Park gave me the impression that your experience occurred in Colorado, but your imprecise language after my post implied that your experience happened at Kirtland. For that, I apologize. You saw the UFO in Utah, not New Mexico.
As far as you being a queer, I figured that if there was ever a homo on this board, it had to be you. Only a homo would post the trifling shit that you do, yes?
FYI, fucktard, I was in Ranger School when I saw some weird shit and I made it clear that my platoon and the Ranger Instructors all could have been hallucinating the same hallucination. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are ya'?
You're now above your average.
How often do you speculate on who might be a homosexual?
Truthfully, I'm 100% sure you're gay, bro and I apologize for insulting you with the word, "faggot." It's only "schtick" and I mean no offense by it. Ask Dookie.
You're probably a very nice guy in person. High-strung and emotional, but probably very pleasant until someone pushes one of your buttons. Even then, you will make an effort to make amends.
Don't you have a class to indoctrinate tomorrow? Oops, I almost forgot...faggot.
His argument is rather persuasive. Ninth through twelfth grades never did anything for him, not to mention his three freshman years at Marquette before they asked him to leave.
suggested that I was crazy. I will say that my parents raised me in a manner not to degrade myself by calling other people names. They taught me that when the other person has to call you names in lieu of a valid response, you have won the discussion. The only time that people resort to name calling is when they cannot respond to the issue in a meaningful manner.
Congrats, after the name calling, you actually hit the nail on the head. There is no valid response as to why the press is acting the way it is. That is my point, and it is a mystery yet to be solved.
BTW, have U finished watching Lost yet?
(no message)