UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

Did he also slam her for being beautiful and smart? Not a cult.

Iconic

Completely devoid of honesty or critical thought

(no message)

It’s not a ho-hum experience even if it just a flesh wound.

It’s disturbing that you marginalize this.

I will refrain from describing how i think that you would react.

A "terrible human being" wouldn't act bravely like he did. Such a terrible person would hide behind others.

Proof under fire.

Not a chance that coward was nicked by a round. You know absolutely nothing about firearms if this is your claim.

He deferred from action with a bogus bone-spurs claim. He paid off a doctor to write a bogus determination.

Please stop with the tough guy trump bullshit. He wears diapers.

(no message)

He was strong, and he was shot at, and that was his reaction.
It doesn't fit your narrative though, does it?
Time to question your narrative.

You guys are such a hoot. You accuse conservatives of seing conspiracies about obvious voting shenanigans with illegal immigration, but then turn around and claim that Trump got the Biden Adm Secret Service and local doctors to go along with a fake shooting where the shooter was a 20 yr old amateur firing a bullet near his head!!! Or, it was some other projectile?!!!

Tell me how this works in your mind, and how do you think he did it?
Does 94 agree with you? (Clearly, LFrankn does (aka "Death" his alternate account handle).

(no message)

Comically stupid

Pussy behavior as I'd expect from a low T Dem male.

Keep lying though, that's all you know how to do.

(no message)

(no message)

Not answering says it all.

And I think it is you who are a bit desperate these days, eh?

Your desperation is hilarious. Your candidate is so incredibly shitty, all you have is lies to try and defend him. Weak and pathetic.

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

accept a bullet or fragment of a bullet nicked his ear as no other explanation is available.

We saw how he "did" react.

He is so not brave, he didn’t even care about those around him who may have been shot once he found out he may have been shot. No respect at all for him. He’s the antichrist.

And you’re just a lowlife cult member.

(no message)

scammed students, raped and abused women and you're praising him.

You're a jackass of the highest order so stop with the holier than thou.

(no message)

(no message)

….unless you think women and elderly men with dementia need that kind of help.

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

already witnessed with the repeal of Roe v Wade.

For innocent female babies...once they're born...they are now at the mercy of insane government legislators.

This is the type of histrionics I am talking about!

Preventable"...read the article and learn.

Then there are the 6M women who at one time in their reproductive lives became pregnant through force or coercion...and without Roe v Wade have no recourse but to endure a life changing...if not threatening...pregnancy for the rest of their lives with all the physical, mental and emotional challenges they NEVER wanted or asked for.

Not enough 'hyperbole' for you?...what's your limit?


Link: https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-abortion-ban-amber-thurman-death

(no message)

(no message)

I'm not even against abortion, I'm in the freakonomics and safe, legal and rare camps. But your is going to convince absolutely no one, because it's absurd. Almost everyone supports exceptions such as rape, incest and the health of the mother, including Trump.

But what we really ought to focus on is preventing unwanted pregnancies. Birth control is highly available everywhere, and there are a multitude of options that are free and or low-cost, safe and effective.

The federalistic approach of leaving it up to the states is the most proper in my opinion. If you live in Alabama and your birth control method of choice is abortion, you should probably move. States like Vermont, New York and California will always permit abortion for any reason,.at any stage of the pregnancy.

But here's what I find really strange about you and your ilk, you wouldn't dare tell Muslims that forcing their women to wear burqas or mutilating the genitals of girls is wrong, i.e their religion is wrong but you have no problem chiding Catholics for following their religious beliefs and teachings as it relates to abortion. And that you do this, while claiming to be a Catholic yourself, is particularly hypocritical.

I'm not even against abortion, I'm in the freakonomics and safe, legal and rare camps. But your is going to convince absolutely no one, because it's absurd. Almost everyone supports exceptions such as rape, incest and the health of the mother, including Trump.

First off, it appears that the Freakonomics leaders, Levitt and Dubner, have had to apologize for, and revise some of their Abortion related claims, which many others consider to be inherently resistant to any consensus solution...so I'm not all sympathetic to that line of discussion. Furthermore, as I've posted previously, at least one study shows that millions of women...at one point in time..., have stated during their reproductive lives they've been victims of forced or coerced pregnancies...I don't consider those 'rare' occurrences...nor do virtually ALL women who venture out at night or even in the daytime...alone. Yet there are too many anti abortion zealots...and too many in government...who want Total Bans on abortions...for any reason...to the point that recent state laws have terrorized Doctors and Nurses with threats of imprisonment and lost licenses into holding back care until it is 99.999% likely that the woman in need is likely to die without that abortion...and they reject the notion that millions of women are indeed subjected to life threatening and altering pregnancies they never wanted, thus leaving all of them without any recourse...save a Back Alley abortion.

We've been through all this before...up until Roe v Wake was decided it was pure chaos throughout the country...therefore, the women of America, and the men who sympathize with their plight, are never going to rest until that Law in reinstated...wherever women reside in this country.


But what we really ought to focus on is preventing unwanted pregnancies. Birth control is highly available everywhere, and there are a multitude of options that are free and or low-cost, safe and effective.

I've posted my choice for reducing the number of abortions, which parallel yours...a) Contraceptives being readily available to both women and men, even those at the poorest levels of income/wealth...b) Sex and Sexuality Education for all ages that teaches respect for others; facts about Reproduction and Child Raising...then c) Increased Funding for programs that make it possible for pregnant women considering abortion to reconsider and carry to term. Unfortunately, there are religious zealots who don't believe in Contraception...the "Just Say No" contingent which is largely Evangelical and even Catholic (although hardly anyone practices that 'guidance')...also, don't forget the chart I posted recently regarding the effectiveness of each Contraceptive Method...hint: there are LOTS of failures...even among committed couples...and quite a few who just could not endure another pregnancy...(i.e. 'Abortion' enters the conversation...like it or not)

The federalistic approach of leaving it up to the states is the most proper in my opinion. If you live in Alabama and your birth control method of choice is abortion, you should probably move. States like Vermont, New York and California will always permit abortion for any reason,.at any stage of the pregnancy.

Leaving the abortion to individual states was what led to Roe v Wade (read Laurence Tribe's "Abortion, the Clash of Absolutes")...it was pure chaos in this country until that decision was made...in practical terms that theory denies women to right to live and work in any state they wish without fear of what might happen should they encounter an Un-Wanted pregnancy. Surely you are aware that many women work in all kinds of business ventures, some large, some small...and some that are perfect for their skills and in turn, the employers needs...BUT they may not be in a state that has legalized abortion...that's what I would call "Restraint of Trade" for Women...not fair to them...and "Sexist", since Men don't have that concern.

But here's what I find really strange about you and your ilk, you wouldn't dare tell Muslims that forcing their women to wear burqas or mutilating the genitals of girls is wrong, i.e their religion is wrong but you have no problem chiding Catholics for following their religious beliefs and teachings as it relates to abortion. And that you do this, while claiming to be a Catholic yourself, is particularly hypocritical.

Both the Obama and Biden administrations have consistently advocated...strongly...for Women's Rights, not just domestically, but internationally...you'd be hard pressed to find even a fraction of such support coming from the GOP...I challenge you to rebut that statement...(but hope that you can). Nonetheless, it's important to understand that Islam is not a Homogeneous and Centralized Religion...e.g. compare and contrast Jordan with Iran's treatment of women when it comes to their choice of 'Dress'...again, I have a reading suggestion for you...it's entitled "No God, But God" by Reza Aslan...it's pretty close to a 'Primer' on Islam...could also be marketed as "Islam For Dummies" ;-)...Having read the book carefully, I would not call their religion "Wrong", since sects within it are very much like our Christian tenets/teachings...maybe even better...to get a sense of what i'm talking about, also go to your library and pickup "Three Cups of Tea" by Greg Mortenson...would that all Christians and Catholics exhibited such an ethos as those Muslims.

As for myself, I'm not going to sit for a session on "Apologetics", especially with people who won't even enter a discussion centered on the only acknowledged PERSON in the Abortion debate...the WOMAN. As I keep repeating, I'm all-in on REDUCING the number of Abortions, everywhere...but not at the cost of Women's Rights and Justice. I'll also bring up the still existent 'Section #2309' of our Catholic Catechism, which deals with "Just Wars"...i.e. the sanctioned Killing of others in order to preserve their Freedom to live their lives as they see fit and not endure the repression of an outside force/government...the term used for arriving at a "Just War" decision involves a critical thinking process called "Prudential Judgement", which is stated at the end of that Catechism Section. I mention this, because it is a very hard decision to come to, and it parallels the equally difficult decision by women when it comes to totally Un-Wanted Pregnancies........One more thing......you've heard me mention Pope Francis' comment on the "Personhood" of a fetus...he hasn't explained why he said that, but he certainly did not choose to say that Personhood begins at Conception...he could easily have done so and stop all discussion on the matter...but he did not. I'll venture to say that he recognizes the very real need for Justice toward women with Un-Wanted pregnancies...and the lack, after 2,000 years, of any clear theology for circumstances like un-embedded fertilized eggs in the uterus...miscarriages...and still births..."Limbo" was an attempt, but that evaporated with nothing to follow...i.e. no grounding for "Personhood" of a fetus.

Here's hoping you find my responses helpful...let me know.

(no message)

(no message)

Bwahahahaha.

interview. Her whole schtick is Trump bad vote me.

one always posed. Brett was so anxious to get her in a gotcha he jumped in 3 seconds into her answer with another question. Guy is a Fox News style journalist not a real one.

Just because Kamla doesn't come across as dementia ridden like Trump you'll always dream up ways to attack her speaking style.

(no message)

the wrong clip. BS. If so, why didn’t he say that at the time and correct it? He got caught with his hand in the cookie jar trying to normalize Orange.

Drawing contrasts is what it’s all about. She did well in a hit piece interview setting. Much better than how Orange would have fared in that circumstance.

(no message)

(no message)

After the debate protection of the Dem candidate by MSM moderators and hostile interviews. and false fact checking by the moderators, and 3 and 4 on 1 against Trump. They now complain?!

What whiny bitches!