WaPO like LA Times, refuses to endorse Cackling Comrade Kamala. Man does she smell.
(no message)
Link: Cacklin Comrade Cameltoe
Replies to: WaPO like LA Times, refuses to endorse Cackling Comrade Kamala. Man does she smell.
Wow! Totally awesome. Hahaha. They clearly don’t buy the fascist/Hitler bullshit…
….that’s just being done ti motivate the looney base to get out and vote.
that kind of crazy rhetoric should not be allowed,
says a lot for her,no record to stand on
Spineless.
“This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty. Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners),” former Post executive editor Martin Baron, who led the paper while Trump was president, said in a text message to The Post. “History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”
A rare moment of insight.
(no message)
how bad does kackling KamALA have to be
for wapo to abandon
They are embarrassed she is losing to Trump
(no message)
Bezos fears consequences from the dictator
(no message)
.
(no message)
Sounds like a pretty base case of projection.
(no message)
You guys should have picked a marginally capable candidate.
(no message)
Irrelevant. Not voting for her doesn’t mean voting for him as you claimed to have done before.
(no message)
You're voting for her, Frances.
You probably already did.
Ayup, sure did. Voted for Hills as well. You are the one who is changing if what you claimed about
2016 and 2020 is true. I have consistently voted for 3 D’s against him.
That's good, avoid the plague rats at the polling place.
We know how terrified you get about your personal viral safety.
Plague is over if you follow the news. Any other irrelevancies when you have no answer?
(no message)
The left is not to blame for the right's promotion of a fascist
You're going to vote for a dictator. Don't blame me.
The left is responsible for nominating Kamala Harris. Deal with it.
(no message)
Kamala has proven to be a formidable and impressive candidate.
It may not be enough, but if she falls short, Kamala has no reason to believe she blew it.
She got < 1% of '20 Dem primary vote and was the first candidate out of about 14.
(no message)
More cash, incumbency, huge voter advantage.
HUGE FAILURE if she does not win.
Nope. This is about the electorate’s baffling connection to Trump.
The race isn’t a toss up because of Kamala. Kamala has made it a race. Biden was DOA.
We would see the same polling numbers if any other formidable Democrat was the candidate.
You refuted nothing I said.
She had more money. Indisputable.
She was the reigning VP. Indisputable.
She had more party voters . Indisputable
Refute these facts or STFU.
Harris promises to have a Republican in her cabinet…sign the bipartisan Immigration Bill
on Day 1…definitely not a fascist.
Fascist, Hitler, Dictator! Drama Queen.
(no message)
Not just the left’s words. See J-Dumbo, Milley, and Kelly.
(no message)
For a guy who supposedly hates soldiers and generals, he sure hired a bunch.
(no message)
Yeah cause he thought they would be like his idol’s generals.
(no message)
Oh, that's it, yeah. Hitler!
You guys lovin' your moronic narratives.
PUTIN
HITLER
PUTIN
HITLER
Uhm nope, your candidate said he wanted generals who would be loyal like Hitler’s generals.
Along with being a moron on history, he is the one that raised Hitler and generals. Oh yeah, his running mate also raised Adolph.
Who said that he said that?
Jeffrey Goldberg at the Atlantic? Unnamed sources?
You have that tape next to the peepee tape on your garage shelf?
Here yah go.
Well, if your fears prove true, you can join Chris in pointing fingers.
But I suspect you'll be in a straight jacket by Dec 1.
Nope but I will be laughing at you fools if he wins. Don’t worry I will continue to remind you
nutties.
Careful. There's a rumor of a hard post limit at 75,000
(no message)
You better hope.
(no message)
You can't rebut it, so you live in denial. And vote in denial.
(no message)
Well, in four years maybe you can point a finger and say, "I told you so."
But, given your record of predictions, I wouldn't bet on it.
He already has 4 years of past history to know his ridiculous claims are false.
(no message)
They refuse to endorse trump - that’s FACT!
(no message)
They are both right!
We might just as well leave Joe in charge... so long as we have an opposition Congress to block any more crazy spendaloozas.
Using conorlarkin logic, if you don't endorse Kamala you are endorsing Trump.
(no message)
The LATimes editors were endorsing Harris until ownership stopped them hence
the resignation of their staff.
But they are refusing to endorse trump.
On Twitter I read that Gaza is the underlying cause of this demurral. I can't imagine anything else.
(no message)
Kamala Dies In The Dark: New WaPo slogan.
(no message)