The fundamental problem with DEI programs promoting/producing unqualified people like Harris
Is that because these people never truly earned what they got, they never fully understand what it means to work hard to achieve something, and to earn it and own it. There's a reason she flunked the bar the first time ... entitlement.
It's no different than the boss' kid who gets to run the company because of his name. The very rare bird steps up in that scenario, but for the other 99%, they ultimately Peter Principle it.
You can make the argument about Trump, but the guy was a fairly effective president both as to economy and foreign policy.
Link: Kamala the glad hander
Replies to: The fundamental problem with DEI programs promoting/producing unqualified people like Harris
How about you give us an example of what would make her qualified in your eyes.
Go ahead - let's see what you come up with.
She was the VIce President. But she is unqualfiied - because she is a black woman.
That is the shit she cannot overcome with the dumb motherfuckery which is about to vote in a tyrant.
AND border czar!
Nevermind her being the least popular VP in history.
Completely untrue that she was tasked to be border czar.
The phrase “border czar” isn’t an official title, but still carries connotations of authority. In politics, “czar” typically refers to a government official tasked with managing a major issue, according to the Cambridge Dictionary.
In Harris’ case, the label comes from President Joe Biden’s March 2021 decision to assign her the duty of addressing the “root causes” of migration from Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador. She was also tasked with encouraging leaders in those countries, as well as Mexico, to enforce immigration laws.
Harris was never asked to be the “border czar,” however, and she was never specifically given the responsibility for security on the border. Harris was also not empowered to set U.S. immigration policy — only the president can sign executive orders and Harris was not empowered as Biden’s proxy in negotiations with Congress on immigration law.
Link: https://thehill.com/homenews/nexstar_media_wire/4910824-vance-called-harris-a-border-czar-during-the-vp-debate-what-does-that-mean/
She is unqualified because her achievements are lacking and lackluster.
(no message)
Really? DA in major metro area, Cali State AG, U.S. Senator, VP of USA. Those are pretty big
achievements. Orange had zero govt experience and 7 business and personal bankruptcies when he first ran. Bet you voted for him despite his lackluster record.
Those are titles. What has she done? What has she achieved? I know that is a difficult concept.
(no message)
She has achieved those offices. They aren’t just given away as titles. What had Orange and
J-Dumbo achieved when they first ran for prez and veep? Give me the un racist answer as to their achievements that entitled them to these offices. You hold her to a different standard which is racist.
She has gotten a job and done nothing with the job is what I'm hearing. Trump was a capable presiden
(no message)
Complete non answer. What were Orange’s and Vance’s achievements when they first ran for these
offices? Why do you racistly hold her to a higher standard?
.
(no message)
We aren't talking about Trump as a first timer. Your argument made sense 8 years ago.
Trump now has a track record.
You can’t answer why you hold her to a different standard than you did for Orange when he first ran
and Vance now? Pretty obvious though.
Well, Vance actually seems to have some understanding of basic economics and policy.
And Trump was a complete and total fluke the first time around. A reaction to the weakness of Romney and McCain.
So again zero accomplishments, yet you supported both.
Again, why do you hold her to a higher standard?
Difference being: she not only lacks bona fides, but knows nothing after 3.5 years in situ
and can't communicate it. Pretty amazing since she came from a profession that is 100% communication.
Face it., she's jiust dumb.
Maybe, but he effed that up royally. One more time, why do you hold her to a higher
standard then those two, especially Orange when he first ran for POTUS and you voted for him?
Rolled the dice and Trump and look what happened (per you). Why take that risk with her?
(no message)
Why don’t you answer a simple question. You already voted for Orange when he had less qualifications
than her and will vote for Vance when he also does. Yet the black woman is held to a higher standard of having to have established “achievements” to your satisfaction. Sounds a bit racist to me.
Everyone voted against Hillary.
Except you of course.
What's your sad excuse this time?
(no message)
P.S. Orange wasn’t a competent president which is why the electorate threw him out.
(no message)
Imagine they re-elect him, how strange that will be.
(no message)
Memories can be short. They will get reminded quickly if he wins.
(no message)
For the average American, Trump wasn't a bad president: peace and prosperity.
He was horrible with the media, unnecessarily so, and he was an asshole to those who worked with him.
Guess what, those things don't impact me.
Utter bullshit. Tossed after one term. Addressed below as well.
(no message)
Had COVID not happened, he'd have been re-elected.
(no message)
COVID did help expose his ineptness in the job.
(no message)
He did some things right (e.g., getting drugs fast tracked). but COVID hit on his weaknesses, Agree.
(no message)
Bullshit. You meant because she is a black woman. Own your racism.
(no message)
Joe Biden is the racist, not me. He selected a VP based on race and gender, per his admission.
(no message)
Own it. Her skin color is why you think she is “unqualified.”
(no message)
Actually, skin color is why you thought that she was qualified. That’s DEI. Her resume and
Performance history are terrible.
No, Baron. Nice try to deflect. The reason she is "unqualified" is because she is black.
(no message)
No, I tube cause she lacks any significant resume or accomplishments to deserve it.
(no message)
I see why US academia is failing - obsession with race rather than competency.
(no message)
Isn't it bizarre that they push race based equity, and then when called on it, you're the racist?
(no message)
Obsession with race and origin is the entire basis for MAGA.
(no message)
You misspelled the Democratic Party. You haven't been paying attention for the last 2 decades.
(no message)
I think I pretty heavily criticized the D’s on that subject. Your crowd though is much the same.
It’s the party of white grievance and white dissatisfaction.
and yet you voted for trump in 2016 - a terrible business man with no, as in zero
experience in government.
And, when she got the unearned chance because she is black, she did nothing with it.
(no message)
Spot on. Harris is absent of merit and achievement worthy of the office.
(no message)
Hopefully she loses and we get beyond race/gender as plot armor.
(no message)
Kam: Affirmative Action lawyer & DEI prez candidate. The dumbing down of America.
(no message)
She is a truly unremarkable and unimpressive person. Good timing though.
(no message)
Says the guy promoting the ultimate unqualified person for the presidency. She is light years more
qualified than he is (admittedly a very low bar) and kicked his ass at the debate. Remember that your guy lost the debate to an unqualified DEI person.
Except he did the job and did it well. She & Biden did not. Inconvenient truth.
(no message)
Yeah that pandemic mishandling, caravans of immigrants, the Afghan deal, ballooning the deficit,
no reform of health care which he promised, no infrastructure repair or improvement which he also promised, no big beautiful wall paid for by Mexico, riots in the street across America, tax cuts for billionaires, he sure did swell.
We got it, you hate women especially women of color.
And no, trump was not an effective leader. In fact, very little got done in his first go round.
NOT A CULT