So Trump won Iowa by 13 pts, how did the experts get it so wrong?
(no message)
Replies to: So Trump won Iowa by 13 pts, how did the experts get it so wrong?
Thread Level: 2
But I was told she (the pollster) was SO well-respected".
That's code words for "Democrat".
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Thread Level: 2
As always, they were trying to steer results to their liking
They don't care about being wrong in hindsight. In the moment, they're trying to manufacture a result.
Thread Level: 3
for starters, they're not "experts". they're influencers. never trust them.
(no message)
Thread Level: 2
Fake polls to discourage turnout
(no message)
Thread Level: 3
Then why did she pick Orange to win both in 16 and 20?
(no message)
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Thread Level: 2
The media is corrupt. You may already know that the reporter behind that poll
is the same reporter who decided not to release the poll that showed Bernie Sanders beating Hillary in Iowa because she didn’t want to hurt Hillary’s campaign.
Thread Level: 3
She also predicted Orange wins in 16 and 20. How does it help her reputation to publish a false
poll that she knows is wrong?
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Thread Level: 4
The media doesn’t care about its credibility. It only cares about setting the narrative.
(no message)
Thread Level: 5
Not a pollster with at least a past reputation for being accurate. She looks bad right now and that
is bad for business.
Thread Level: 3
Did not know that, but I find it interesting that the media doesn't understand how credibility works
Given that it's core to their line of business, you'd think they would learn the obvious lessons.