Pollster J Ann Selzer says her +3 Iowa margin for Harris that was really +13 Trump "could have been
the result of late-deciding voters".
"Deeply respected" (code for "Loyal Democrat" J Ann Selzer of the Iowa Register.
Yeah J Ann, like there are that many people who hadn't made up their minds 3 days before this race of polar opposites.
I realize that she is trying to save some face, but that kind of comment just confirms either her incompetence, or more likely her complicity in an attempt to manipulate voters with discouragement/encouragement just prior to the election.
Link: https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/donald-trump-pollsters-kamala-harris/2024/11/06/id/1187033/
Replies to: Pollster J Ann Selzer says her +3 Iowa margin for Harris that was really +13 Trump "could have been
If they say you are too believe it. Marx
(no message)
She’s the same pollster who refused to publish a poll showing Bernie beating Hillary
in the 2016 primary. She’s a loyal Democrat servant. Never believe the media, except when they make an admission against their interest.
I think white women lied to pollsters and voted with their husbands.
They might have misunderstood the instructions.
heheh. From lowly fry cook to president in just 2 weeks.
(no message)
Alka Seltzer?
(no message)
It's "J Alka Selzter" to we the garbage..
(no message)
You won, take a break from whining.
(no message)
Seriously right. Goes to show grievance is their umber one policy position.
(no message)
When Donald betrays them with Project 2025 - and he will - who will they blame?
(no message)
Uh, who's whining?
(no message)