ic prick.
(no message)
(no message)
When Trump appoints a woman she’s highly qualified. Did I get that right?
That is not surprising. Californication.
dems appointed/hired on the basis of race, sexual orientation, or other vacuous "qualification". that's dei.
conservatives appoint/hire based on performance, experience, intelligence, and leadership regardless of race/gender/orientation/religion. that's meritocracy.
see the difference?
And to claim that Kamala was a DEI “hire” or appointee is being intellectually dishonest, but you knew that already. And no, there is no difference. Optics are optics no matter the party affiliation.
I’m a true Republican…not some dumb ass Trump sycophant.
(no message)
kamala was a "dei" hire.
or that you're a liberal/dem.
my point is that conservatives tend to use legitimate performance credentials (merit) while liberals use irrelevant personal properties (dei).
if i'm going to have bypass surgery, i want it to be performed by someone who got there because they do the best job not because they're queer.
but, you can have it your way. best of luck.
And I’ll pray for you for a speedy and complete recovery.
Thank you for helping keep our great country free.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Difference here being she demonstrated competence and was rewarded. She wasn't appointed because of a set of random characteristics like ovaries and melanin.
...especially as DA and AG...she has earned her positions.
btw, given the circumstances, let's all hope that Susie Wiles lasts longer than DJT's previous Chiefs of Staff.
Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris
.
That shows your ignorance and it shows that you’re one of Trump’s sheep. Such a shame.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
One in particular is that he will end the War in Ukraine within 24 hours of him taking office. Don’t be a sheep, dummy.