Pedo Gaetz for AG? Bwahahahahahaha. The cultists here will support it. Guy should be in an
orange jumpsuit with Orange. Good luck America, but you brought it on yourself.
Replies to: Pedo Gaetz for AG? Bwahahahahahaha. The cultists here will support it. Guy should be in an
Anyone who supports the Gaetz pick doesn't want good governance. They just want to own the libs.
Priorities exposed. Not serious people.
What s wrong with owning the libs? They have been screwing this
country for the last 4 years, and they need a reality check. The country has been dealing with their horse shit
picks and now you claim we are not serious? Wake up and smell the consequences
Doesn't Trump deserve his own Holder/Garland?
Your rules now.
It isn't just about justice (or revenge as you see it).
You've set the rules. Then when you lose, you always expect the Right to reset honestly. Inevitably, this pushes the needle further Left over time. That is your expectation. But you lost, and this is different.
Trump's greatest mistake in his last administration was hiring a limp noodle AG (Sessions). It allowed the completely bogus Russia, Russia, Russia nonsense to obstruct his presidency until Mueller found nothing.
If the Dems can expend enough ammo to thwart Gaetz, Trump will then have his choice again. It also helps with distracting from the Dems violent opposition to Noem, and others.
Your party has completely politicized all of these positions, and now you suddenly want different. Unsurprising - Liberalism Rule #2: The Rules Are For Thee and Not Me.
Indeed. Gaetz, Gabbard, and Hegseth are not qualified for their prospective posts.
Gaetz is by far the worst of the three.
We will soon learn if Senate Republicans are going to hold the line or show their lack of integrity as they did during the impeachment trials.
It appears increasingly obvious that the electorate is going to get the America they voted for: unprecedented incompetence and chaos.
Yet Harris was qualified for the most important job of all? Okaaayyy...
(no message)
Immensely qualified. Don’t be small minded Mark.
(no message)
Despite not ever receiving one vote? Despite showing an inability to answer fair questions?
Sounds like her qualifications are like giving students the right to grade themselves.
She’s Abraham Lincoln compared to those 3.
(no message)
But their luggage will be safe. (We've all seen what a "qualified" Midnight Raid Garland did btw).
(no message)
PS-Multiple combat decorations,Princeton&Harvard grad.Author.Already far more qualified than Harris.
He is just not from the usual lifer pool of political generals in DC.
You wish to see him only as a Fox TV host.
Yikes! Serious allegation. Post the indictment when you get a chance.
Counselor.
You defending this pedo now? Figures. McCarthy wanted him expelled from the HOR over it which is why
he lost the speakership.
I'd like to see the indictment before I decide. Please post it.
Would think a country lawyer who makes his shekels sucking off the public teat would be circumspect about making wild charges like this.
Then you will be disappointed. The House Ethics Report may enlighten you if they ever have the guts
to release it. The victim’s testimony before the Senate should also be further enlightening.
You would be the first to jump to this creep’s defense.
.
(no message)
Well, post any actual documentation if you ever find it.
TIA.
Psst….there won’t be. His resignation kills the ongoing HOR inquiry. And he resigned effective
immediately even though there is a good chance he will not be confirmed by the Senate. He doesn’t want those results to see the light of day. And you defend this guy. Real family values.
Hilarious that you think the Garland DOJ would decline to bring charges against Gaetz..
If there was even the flimsiest chance of them sticking.
I'd wonder if you were just overly partisan, but we all know it's just because you are a total moron.
Hmmm, so then why was the GOP HOR pursuing these attached allegations when your choice resigned?
They spoke to more than 12 witnesses, subpoenaed 25, and were still pursuing it when your guy resigned.
From their press release:
Representative Gaetz has categorically denied all of the allegations before the Committee. Notwithstanding the difficulty in obtaining relevant information from Representative Gaetz and others, the Committee has spoken with more than a dozen witnesses, issued 25 subpoenas, and reviewed thousands of pages of documents in this matter. Based on its review to date, the Committee has determined that certain of the allegations merit continued review. During the course of its investigation, the Committee has also identified additional allegations that merit review.
Link: https://ethics.house.gov/press-releases/statement-regarding-matter-representative-matt-gaetz
I guess a committee like this likes to be thorough.
Perhaps they can take comfort in the fact that Garland’s DOJ declined to pursue the matter.
Sure they do. They could have easily closed it against a fellow R. Yet they haven’t and were still
pursuing it when your guy chose to resign immediately without knowing if he would be confirmed. So we couldn’t wait for the report before making this guy AG…..amirite?
Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me, Frances.
If you can ever provide even a tiny bit of evidence on your very serious allegations, please do.
Do better Piggles. An HOR investigation of sexual misconduct isn’t a conspiracy theory.
Yet you support someone for AG without knowing the results, which we never will know now. Real family values man piggies.
When did I support him? Please post that link.
I object to your evidence-free libel, counselor.
You are supporting him throughout this thread. Something many of his own colleagues won’t do.
You support his nomination for AG despite the fact he was still under ethics investigation for sexual misconduct when he resigned so we will never see the results?
He also resigned 2 days before the report was set to be released.
“ Punchbowl News reported Wednesday that his resignation came just two days before the panel was set to vote on releasing a report on its probe.”
I have only asked you to provide evidence for your remarks
Which you cannot do.
How would you feel if some semi-anomynous internet moron called you a pedo? You’d be happy to have an upstanding character like me asking tough questions on your behalf.
The evidence is the continuing probe, his refusal to cooperate with it even though it’s from his own
party, and the fact that he resigned 2 days before it was to be released to squash it.
Yet you refuse to state whether he’s qualified to be AG.
I didn’t go to Widener Law, but based on watching Law and Order
a “continuing probe” is not evidence of anything. Please correct me if that is wrong, counselor.
It’s proof that there is sufficient evidence to continue to probe. Read the press release moron.
And unlike Ms. Habba, I didn’t go there although many good lawyers have.
Yet you think someone still under that probe, who resigns 2 days before the report is set to be released to squash it is qualified to be AG? Brilliant family values logic.
I don't know. What should we infer if someone takes the Fifth?
Or declines to speak with police until his lawyer arrives?
These are all indications of guilt, I guess?
Temple is impressive, too! Top ten in the state of PA on every list I have seen.
That they shouldn’t be AG? That’s the issue piggies not whether he committed a crime. Take some
night courses at Widener.
Well, Frank, you called him a pedo.
I'm just wondering what evidence you have to back that serious allegation up. None apparently.
Furthermore, if someone asserts his constitutional rights, he should never be an AG? I'm really confused by your muddled thought process.
You never went to law school, and you just proved that you’re a better lawyer than LFranken.
(no message)
Indeed I did Piggles and he is. The 5th Anmendment has nothing to with it.
He’s not qualified to be AG due to the behavior being probed including being a pedo.
.
be disqualifying yourself be AG. You feel differently or do you want to keep shuffling?
Love the down votes. This from the crowd that wants to “protect children”. Keep em coming.
(no message)
The crowd that encourages sex trafficking across southern border suddenly opposes sex trafficking.
Yes, yes, only Democrats get to sex traffic. There is no end to the double standard.
[Assuming your allegation for the sake or argument. I too, like Iggle, welcome any evidence you have of this allegation.]
You would be the second defender to jump in for this creep.
The ethics allegations are far broader than sex trafficking. Here read them. Of course they now end as he has resigned effective immediately.
Link: https://ethics.house.gov/press-releases/statement-regarding-matter-representative-matt-gaetz
I didn't realize Congressmen could get away with crimes simply by resigning. Seems unfair.
(no message)
You mean ethics violations that can get you dismissed from Congress? That’s what you want as AG?
Well done Ned. You are a complete cultist.
No. You accused him of a crime, I thought. Did you not do that? I guess not.
By the way, just pointing out a hypocrisy that bothered me, knowing that Harris supporters inherently promote child sex trafficking by promoting an open border.
As to Goetz, I don't really care. I am disappointed that we will have to look at Butthead during DOJ press conferences, that is for sure. At least I think Butthead is the one on the left....
I didn’t accuse him of trafficking you dope. I accuse him of an inappropriate relationship with a
minor which is what is under HOR investigation.
You don't see similarity btn child sex trafficking & relationship with minor? And no crime? Whatevs.
(no message)
They are different and an inappropriate relationship with a minor may not be a crime but it should
be disqualifying to be AG….yes?
Running.low on Xanax Frankie Boy? Get
Over it, loser. It was a mandate, but keep swinging