SCOPA rules Dems cannot count invalid ballots (Again) & warns Ds they are breaking the law.
Gee, I can't imagine why everyone thinks that Dems cheat in elections.
The Dem canvassers were on video two days earlier openly saying that they would not obey the law.
My guess is that they at least tried to mix these votes in already in order to make them unrecoverable. At this point, any recount that miraculously went the other way could not be trusted....thanks Dems. Just like in 2020, their actions take away all public confidence in the voting process.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsylvania-supreme-court-upholds-exclusion-certain-mail-in-ballots-victory-gop
Replies to: SCOPA rules Dems cannot count invalid ballots (Again) & warns Ds they are breaking the law.
What's scary is 3 justices said it was okay for them to break the law
(no message)
Dave McCormick believes that the ballots should be counted.
Now, … no.
Exhibit 376 of Republicans’ intellectual dishonesty.
Link: https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-david-mccormick-philadelphia-pennsylvania-mehmet-oz-977584c72da311fe404b84bc92db1bc4
People who put party over country. Look at FrankL: condemns Trump, supports Democrats for same act.
(no message)
the solution is immediate and obvious:
show up at your polling place on election day, show your identification, fill out your paper ballot, go get a drink and wait.
simple, effective, honest process. only cheaters want to change it.
Not so fast Baron...from the attached article...
The state’s highest court dismissed one case on technical grounds this summer, and overturned another on the eve of the election because it was too close to election day. The court has never directly said whether the requirement violates the state constitution.
This debate is not over...
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/18/pennsylvania-missing-date-mail-in-ballots
Form over substance. The PA GOP set up trip wires to suppress votes.
But, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling is what it is. Casey can ask federal courts to weigh in.
Once all legal avenues are exhausted, Casey will honor the rulings of the judiciary.
What Casey will not do is ask Governor Shapiro to go find him X number of votes to prevail nor will he incite a mob to reign violence upon our institutions.
You are a hypocrite and a horrible American. Truly.
A video of Dem vote counters admitting they’re cheating intentionally not enough.Liberalism Rule #14
Here’s another example of proof that Dems have been cheating in elections. But the proof is never enough for a zealot’s mind.
BaronVonZemo's Rules of Liberalism:
Liberalism Rule #1 - accuse others of that which you are/do.
Liberalism Rule #2 - the rules apply to thee and not me
Liberalism Rule #3 - We know what is best, thus the ends justify the means.
Liberalism Rule #4 - We believe ourselves to be smarter thus, we cannot admit that we are wrong.
i. Admitting mistakes undermines the premise of being smarter, ergo self correction is not possible.
Liberalism Rule #5 - What didn’t work last time, will work next time (see 4 i.)
Liberalism Rule #6 - When we lose, change the rules.
i Whenever convenient, change the definition to suit our goal.
Liberalism Rule #7 - Appeasement is the best deterrent to foreign conflict.
Liberalism Rule #8 - TotallyDifferentism - when we do something that we don’t like others doing, it is always “totally different”.
Liberalism Rule #9 - Equity through inequity (any difference must be equalized by pulling down the
unaffected party. Vengeance is preferable).
Liberalism Rule #10 - We support our representative speaking regardless of the truth (in contrast to
conservatives who support the truth regardless of the representative speaking it).
Liberalism Rule #11 - We vote on personality over policy.
Liberalism Rule #12 - Genetics are selective. We believe that sexuality and guilt are genetic, but gender is not. Scientific proof is not required.
Liberalism Rule #13 - Do SOMETHING! When a crisis happens, do SOMETHING! It doesn't have to have to work, but it must: a) make us feel better which is more important than actually solving the crisis, and b) advance the liberal agenda.
Liberalism Rule #14 -"You’ll have to show us a lot more than rock solid, irrefutable evidence”.
Liberalism Rule #15 - There are no universal truths. The truth changes to fit our needs.
Liberalism Rule #16 - The Expert Threshold. If a false narrative has enough “experts” backing it, it becomes truth regardless of evidence to the contrary. “Experts” are defined as those who support the narrative, and they can be conjured if necessary (because of Liberalism Rule #3).
Liberalism Rule #17 - Charity ends at home. It is accomplished through the government with other people’s money.
Liberalism Rule #18 - When failure or bad behavior is completely undeniable, distance yourself from complicity to salve your guilty conscience.
Liberalism Rule #19 - Guns don’t kill people, liberals with guns kill people. Violence comes from the Left.
You seem upset about no more cross-dressing admirals.
(no message)
Have you figured out the budget costs for mass deportations?
Trump has a mandate! Please go full speed ahead on mass deportation plans!
Once we stop pissing money away in Ukraine, we'll be in good shape to start booting people
back to their shithole countries. Lets start with the criminals Biden/Harris let into our country and then flew to other states. I know this will put a dent into your client listing but it's the right thing for our country.
Explain the "trip wires" comment.
(no message)
Here.
Sign and date doesn't seem like an onerous requirement to me
How did all of the stupid Trump voters figure it out?
Voters for both candidates undoubtedly had their mail in ballots rejected.
Let’s say it was 1% of PA voters.
1% of Philadelphia County is much more than 1% of rural counties. The legislature knows the math when these trip wires are enacted.
In fairness, Pennsylvania flags the errors and endeavors to notify the voter so they can cast a provisional ballot.
Casey will still fall short in my opinion. Too much ground to cover.
I don't understand your 1% argument.
If the 1% of voters too dumb to follow basic instructions are evenly distributed between Trump and Kamala, it makes no difference to the results. Because Trump got more of the 99%, his 1% would be larger than Kamala's.
1% of 100k = 1000. 1% of 1,000,000 = 10,000.
(no message)
Hahahaha! Those votes need to then be split by the % to each candidate (a % favoring the R).
No wonder you vote Democrat.
Leave math to the smart people……not the ones that told you to wear neckerchiefs during COVID.
Run these numbers for me: 1% of 50.4/100 * total votes vs 1% of 48.6/100 * total votes.
If its evenly distributed, as you suggested, it doesn't matter.
BOOM! Dems are not good at understanding actual math.
They wouldn’t know real science (math here)if it bit them in the ass.
Basic math would be a trip wire.
We seem to be one step away from complaining that mail-in ballots have to be mailed to be counted.
Not being able to follow directions to sign and date? Sounds like good group of votes to not count.
I get that Democrats want all the stupid and lazy people voting. That is your major constituency.
I also get that you don't want Democrat vote counters to follow the law, because following the law that makes it harder for your side to win.
But, getting all of the stupid and lazy people's votes counted by breaking the law...that hardly seems like a good thing for the country.