Bragg has until Dec 9 to file a response to the motion.
Laughably, Bragg wanted the case postponed for 4 years instead of just listening to the SCOTUS tell him his case violated the Constitution.
I guess that he hasn't heard of the 6th Amendment. which is not surprising given his lack of knowledge/concern with the rest of the Constitution.
The people have spoken, and they clearly feel that Bragg's case was a Banana Republic move. Jack' Smith's coordinated DOJ involvement needs to be addressed here as well by Bondi, the new AG.
Thanks Alvin for helping to elect President Trump....all for nothing.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-judge-grants-trump-request-file-motion-dismiss-case-cancels-sentencing-indefinitely
(no message)
position without congressional authority as called for by the law.
How could they not realize they were effectively campaigning for him?
didn't realize that the general public saw through the sham and was disgusted by it.
If this was an actual crime, the why is Merchan now finally, after the election, allowing a motion for dismissal when he never did before?
The SCOTUS blew this case apart in July.
The answer is now very clear to ALL. It was purely a political witch hunt by a fascist (yes the term they call others Rule #1) administration.
from the "Charging Instrument" that put Michael Cohen in prison...literally EVERYONE knew who "Individual-1" was...Donald J. Trump...the CAUSE of Mr. Cohen's illegal actions. (ref: fmr SDNY Attorney, Geoffrey Berman's book "Holding The LIne").
All Judge Merchan is doing is allowing Trump's attorneys to plead their case. It's the opinion of several observers that DJT will be sentenced as soon as he leaves the WH in 2029. A jury has seen the evidence and rendered its decision.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/01/alvin-bragg-trump-hush-money-prosecutor/
(no message)
having his AG remove All references to “Individual-1” in the Charging Document that put Michael Cohen in prison.
This not an opinion…it is fact backed up with names dates and witnesses by the head of the SDNY.
American's trust in the criminal justice system is in the toilet.
...from the attached "Lawfare" (would you believe ;-)) article...here's an excerpt dealing with that "Individual-1" reference I made from SDNY Berman's book where Trump's AG
------------------
It was a puzzling thing to say. Comparable charges have been brought against people whose names are not Donald Trump. A similar—if weaker—case was brought against former vice presidential candidate John Edwards, and a factually identical case was brought against Michael Cohen, albeit in federal court. In fact, ever since the federal case against Cohen was brought, there had been a manifest injustice in the government’s failure to bring a corresponding case against Trump—or “Individual-1” as he was referred to in the government’s information filed alongside Cohen’s guilty plea. He was, after all, the person who, the government alleged, directed Cohen’s criminal actions and benefited from them. District Attorney Bragg’s indictment, in finally ending that unseemly asymmetry, might have been justified on those grounds alone. (My colleague, Quinta Jurecic, has laid out some thoughts about why federal prosecutors might have decided not to pursue Trump themselves on the hush-money charges.)
----------------
Again, I have evidence of what happened and it's corroborated by others...you have shown nothing to refute it...and certainly nothing to support a claim of lying on anyone's part...not Geoffrey Berman, the author of the Lawfare article...or me. You're a person who deals with data, Cheeks...why don't you employ it here?
Link: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/was-d.a.-bragg-right-to-bring-the-new-york-charges-against-trump
Then calls it a "fact" with evidence based on the claims of some Soros-funded crony.
persons involved along with naming witnesses...none of them have refuted his account of the matter...so, aside from just wanting to be an annoyance ;-), on what basis do you make such a post?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
a very hard time this week
Desperately seeking approval from your dipshit brethren
(no message)
I don't give a shit what morons who lack integrity think
the qualities he purports to hold dear...Morality, Ethics, Honesty, Faith, Belief in Christian Values, etc...
(no message)
(no message)
That's why you and your cohorts gang up on every piece of truth presented to you. None of you have integrity or honor so your opinions are less than useless.
Even challenging Tyrone in that regard
Kinda weird, amirite?