Ned, Does a new Rule of Liberalism #20 on concrete thinking require an explanation to libs?.....
should I spell it out for them that I didn't invent the actual term or concept of "concrete thinking", but instead am linking it to a consistently reproduceable flaw in liberal psychopathology?
If the inability to understand is just The Grim Reaper bringing up the left side of the intellectual Bell Curve, I'd hate to hold them all down to the level of the slowest student.
And if I do have to give such an explanation, doesn't it stand as proof of the rule?
Or, is it not necessary since these rules are for others to help understand and assist with those dealing with the mental illness of liberalism?
What do you think?
Replies to: Ned, Does a new Rule of Liberalism #20 on concrete thinking require an explanation to libs?.....
Well, there is no helping Death. He will just use UHND.com as an opportunity for personal threats.
That is the resort of the far left of the bell curve. They don't understand why they don't understand, so they resort to name calling and eventually threats of violence.
No amount of explanation will get through to him. He thinks if he keeps repeating something, it will become true. He thinks truth is something he creates when he speaks, not something that can be discovered or learned...which means he can be forever blissfully free of the burden of awareness. Given that, your true audience is not him.
No one was threatened, you're an idiot
You have misinterpreted so many things and expect that you'll be taken seriously? Good luck asshole.