All D lawfare distilled into an unconditional discharge and actual fed charge never revealed
…but Merchan’s kangaroo court was highly successful at re-electing President Trump, so we should all thank the corrupt judge and Jack Smith who was assigned by the Biden DOJ to coordinate and oversee the attacks of their political rival.
I actually wonder if the libs wanted Trump elected because of their TDS - they need Trump to fuel the hatred to which they are addicted.
And, OF COURSE THE CONVICTION ULTIMATELY WILL BE SET ASIDE ON APPEAL AS SOON AS IT IS HEARD OUTSIDE OF THE NEW YORK POLITICAL COURTS.
Thanks Merch Baby. #MAGA
Replies to: All D lawfare distilled into an unconditional discharge and actual fed charge never revealed
Translation: The rule of law only applies to suckers and losers. Trump is entitled to be lawless.
(no message)
My words stand by themselves without need of modification. I mean exactly what I say.
You must have forgotten this and thought you were referencing a liberal.
That is the sad truth regarding how BaronvonZemo thinks...conjures up rules for everyone else, yet
refuses to accept any criticism of his behavior or beliefs..as I have done, and in response he goes into a non-responsive bubble.
This is an Open Forum...a search for Truth requires reasoned and respectful debate...thus far, Baron refuses to "Play Ball".
As is Hunter Biden.
(no message)
The jury in Hunters case wasn’t important. Joey made sure of that.
(no message)
Another "Clean Up on Aisle 5"...Baron falls for Trump's 180 deg twist of the facts...DJT should have
been indicted years ago. As I've repeatedly posted...here is the truth regarding the trial and justified Felony Conviction of Donald Trump...an excerpt from the attached article...
-------------------
So why is it that the case against the presumptive GOP nominee is only reaching a courtroom now? As it turns out, we know the answer — though it isn’t one Trump likes to talk about.
To briefly recap, as Election Day 2016 approached, Trump and his political operation were concerned about the public learning about his alleged sexual encounter with a porn star who goes by the name Stormy Daniels. With those fears in mind, the then-candidate and his team created a shell company, which Trump’s fixer, Michael Cohen, used to pay off Daniels, effectively buying her silence.
Soon after, Trump, according to prosecutors, falsified business records while making incremental payments to Cohen, reimbursing the lawyer for the scheme.
These are the same payments that ultimately sent Cohen to prison, which leads to the obvious question of why he, and not his former client — identified as “Individual 1” in court documents — faced serious consequences. After all, Cohen pleaded guilty to crimes he committed in coordination with Trump, and he produced evidence of Trump-signed checks.
As Rachel explained on last night’s show, the federal prosecutor overseeing the Southern District of New York at the time was Geoffrey Berman — a lifelong Republican, who worked on the Trump campaign and the Trump transition team, and who was chosen by Trump for the office. It was Berman who later wrote a book about his experiences, shedding light on what transpired in the Cohen case.
In fact, according to Berman, after his office secured Cohen’s guilty plea, officials from the Justice Department in Washington, D.C., started intervening in matters in New York City, effectively trying to make the Trump/Cohen mess go away.
Berman went so far as to claim that once Bill Barr became Trump’s attorney general, Barr “not only tried to kill the ongoing investigations, but — incredibly — suggested that Cohen’s conviction on campaign finance charges should be reversed.”
Berman’s office was told to “cease all investigative work” on the allegations until Barr and his team were satisfied that there was a legal basis to the campaign finance charges to which Cohen had already pleaded guilty. The prosecutor wondered at the time about whether the then-attorney general was trying to shield Trump from possible legal liabilities after he was out of office.
All of which is to say, Barr and his team directly intervened in an ongoing federal criminal investigation that implicated the then-president, who’d appointed Barr. As part of this intervention, Berman’s office was also directed to remove damaging references to Trump in court filings.
In case that weren’t enough, Trump’s Justice Department also directed Berman to investigate Democrats who’d committed no crimes. When the prosecutor resisted, Barr told the public that Berman had resigned. He hadn’t. Soon after, Trump fired him.
But while the then-attorney general and his team interfered in a case that implicated their boss, it had the effect of delaying local prosecutors' investigation because they deferred to their federal counterparts.
Eventually, Trump’s Justice Department quietly let it be known that it was no longer examining allegations in the Cohen case, and two weeks later, prosecutors in New York started issuing subpoenas.
Why is the former president’s case only coming to trial now? In part because the Trump administration politicized the legal process and perverted a federal investigation without cause.
The former president has the entire scandal backwards. He believes the real controversy is that the case wasn’t prosecuted sooner, when it reality, it would’ve been prosecuted sooner had partisans on his team not corrupted the process on his behalf.
Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/maddow-blog-why-didn-t-172953339.html
No one will take you seriously with Maddow as a source.
(no message)
She and MSNBC have NEVER been found to have knowingly broadcast lies, like FOX has...on what basis
do you question Rachel Maddow?...Can you cite even one instance where she and her network have been proven wrong.
In this particular case, I myself have read former SDNY Attorney, Geoffrey Berman's book where he documents the names of Trump AG personnel who spoke with his attorneys and had them remove all references to "Individual-1"...i.e. Donald Trump, so I can verify what the article and Rachel Maddow assert.
Now as for you...I'm not seeing ANYTHING that counters what's been reported...NADA. So, should anyone take YOU seriously?...I don't think so. ;-)...
See below, you just had yr ass handed to you. Gets tiresome doesn't it ?
(no message)
See my response to Musky below...btw, care to engage on a topic of your choice, Coley?...
...that's what an Open Forum is for...not just a Graffiti Wall for personal grievances...let's hear it.
Easy one. Wrong again.You, yourself are vaccinated and you said you got Covid twice. Thanks for
being the participant that showed she lied.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/media/social-media-users-demand-apology-msnbc-rachel-maddow-vaccines.amp
We just covered this on Christmas Eve...having memory problems?
check out the attached post and thread...here's a quick summary...
>RM encouraged her viewers to DO THE RIGHT THING...FOR THEIR OWN GOOD. A 95% effective, and very safe vaccine was available free of charge
>ICUs across the country were reporting that ~98% of COVID deaths were those who were UNVACCINATED
>Her encouragement did NO HARM WHATSOEVER...quite the opposite...with facts like that...if everyone got vaccinated immediately, we could have achieved "Herd Immunity" much more quickly and saved many thousands of lives...and been able to open up businesses, schools, etc. much sooner.
btw, my getting COVID twice, but having no more than a brief low grade fever is testament to the primary purpose of a vaccine...i.e. keep people OUT OF THE HOSPITAL...also, my infections occurred after new variants came along...not when RM was making the remarks you noted.
Now...let's talk about FOX and its $787M payout for lying
>Internal memos found through the case 'Discovery' process showed that FOX Ownership and show hosts knew the claims of a Stolen Election through voting machines were false, but in order to keep their stock prices from falling they chose to allow the falsehoods to be broadcast
>FOX's decision helped sustain the "Big Lie", when they should have told viewers the opposite
>Great Harm followed.
You clearly have no concept of what "Lying" means...otherwise, you would instantly reject what FOX and Trump have said, while embracing what Rachel Maddow said. The first example was one of self enrichment that ended up causing great harm to the nation...while what Rachel Maddow said was in the very best interests of others...i.e. the health of the entire nation.
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=227658
That’s not what she told her viewers. She said you couldn’t get it or spread it. Quit making shit up
She said nothing what you just said. You spoke for her. Try again.
Do you not see the difference between what FOX did and what Rachel said?
(no message)
She lied. You’re wrong. Thanks for participating in her lie.
(no message)
In case you didn't know, 95% effectiveness is very close to 100%...and following her advice would
encourage viewers to do the right thing for their health and lives...What is your problem with that? Yet, you have no problem whatsoever with FOX and its hosts spewing known lies to keep their stock price up...and fomenting misinformation that ended up getting people killed and injured in the Jan. 6th Insurrection.
Clearly, your mind isn't working properly.
She lied.
(no message)
Rachel Maddow didn't lie...she got her information from CDC Director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, as the
attached link explains. The article also goes on to explain all the details of why the CDC was so anxious to increase the percentage of the population were vaccinated, since in the early going it was only around 30%...we needed somewhere in the neighborhood of 70%+ to achieve "Herd Immunity" from COVID.
Once again, as we've all seen by now...getting vaccinated has always been the right path to take...even when the first use was only 95% effective.
Stop trying to excuse the Proven Liars around you by trying to find the relative 'pin head' of a mistake by people you see as 'Opponents', instead of Professionals doing their very best to keep you Healthy and Alive...or even Free from a deeply flawed 'Wannabe Hitler', as J.D. Vance would say.
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/health/coronavirus-vaccine-walensky.html
She lied and so do you. She said this bs 4 months into the vaccine. No
Effectiveness could be proven with them percentages you showed. You lose again.
Rachel Maddow did not lie...and I've got proof. Here is the actual transcript of that broadcast...
...note that it includes a clip of CDC Director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky making the exact statement Rachel repeated...i.e. Rachel was repeating what she had learned from the CDC. Go back and read my entire post and link...it explains why it was Dr. Walensky's error to overstate the effectiveness of the COVID vaccines (but not by much)...NOT RACHEL MADDOW.
I'm not blaming you for your claim...you've been misinformed by your news source(s)...for some reason they left out the initial portion of the broadcast where the CDC's Director made the statement that Rachel simply repeated...and why not, when it's someone of that stature.
Link: https://www.msnbc.com/transcripts/transcript-rachel-maddow-show-3-29-21-n1262442
He’s constantly proven wrong here.
He just refuses to acknowledge it. Delusional.
He’s a good little soldier. He beats that liberal drum no matter what.
(no message)
And another. We can bet on this one if you like?
(no message)
Link: https://www.aol.com/rachel-maddow-worried-trump-send-134805832.html