We can now know who broke the law by Biden's pardons - esp previously innocuous family members
"And just 22 minutes before leaving office, Biden also pardoned his family, including his brother James B. Biden, sister Valerie Biden Owens, brother-in-law John T. Owens, and brother Francis W. Biden. The former president had previously issued a blanket pardon to his adult son, Hunter Biden, after he was convicted in two separate federal cases last year".
Replies to: We can now know who broke the law by Biden's pardons - esp previously innocuous family members
Pardoned them all so we would have to guess who the real
Guilty parties were
No, not all. Just those involved. Unbeknownst - his other brother Francis was in on it w/ Jim Biden&
his daughter and son in law. He didn't issue pardons for every family member - just around 5 - the one's involved in monetizing American policy for cash from our enemy.
No need to guess who the Guilty Party is in all of this...see the Conclusion in Volume 1 of
SC Jack Smith's Report...
------------------
VI. CONCLUSION
On remand from the Supreme Comi's decision in Trump, the district court set a litigation
schedule whereby the parties would submit briefs regarding whether any material in the
superseding indictment was subject to presidential immunity. ECF No. 233. The parties were in
the middle of that process when the results of the presidential election made clear that Mr. Trump
would be inaugurated as President of the United States on January 20, 2025. As described
above, it has long been the Department's interpretation that the Constitution forbids the federal
indictment and prosecution of a sitting President, but the election results raised for the first time
the question of the lawful course when a private citizen who has already been indicted is then
elected President. The Department detem1ined that the case must be dismissed without prejudice
136
before Mr. Trump takes office, and the Office therefore moved to dismiss the indictment on
November 25, 2024. See ECF No. 281. The district court granted the motion the same day.
ECF No. 283.
The Department's view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and
prosecution of a President is categorical and does not tum on the gravity of the crimes charged,
the strength of the Government's proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Office stands
fully behind. Indeed, but for Mr. Trump's election and imminent return to the Presidency, the
Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at
trial.
-----------------------
Biden's pardons spare innocent citizens of Donald Trump's vengeance and his use of taxpayer funds to harass them for holding him accountable for crimes that Grand Juries found worthy of indictments.
Link: https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf
Here's your biggest flaw when it comes to legal matters
And I don't care if you're an attorney.
You automatically take as gospel legal opinions with which you prefer. I made a point that Alan Derschowitz, Jonathan Turley and another Democrat law professor from Columbia all said the New York charges were improper and that the judge made several incorrect rulings and gave improper jury instructions. Your response? They're all wrong.
I never said they were right or wrong. All I pointed out was they had a different view that should be considered. But I guess you know the law better than they do. (I also learned you know medicine better than actual professors of medicine and Baron.)
Plus the concepts and principles of the Constitution of the United States e.g., cross examination.
(no message)
Assume they are the ones who were reported to have received the China cash.
(no message)
He has over 8k in pardons. I’m sure he made the decision on every one of them. You know,
Because he was running the country.
Yet the libs will whine about the J6 pardons
(no message)
Oh the drama is thick. Corey Booker was on TV stating that 5 officers were killed that day.
I’m sure the dipshits I have on ignore and going full on Karen with these pardons.
Oh yes, they will. Rule #2. The rules are for thee, not me.
(no message)
Well some of them actually Pled Guilty to "Seditious Conspiracy"...not sure we want those folks
roaming free...btw, that should raise questions about Who Else were they conspiring with...and Why were some of them in the Willard Hotel "War Room" talking with Mark Meadows on Jan. 5th?
They have no right to...not any more.
(no message)
his radicals put it in front of him, he'll sign
(no message)
Like Radar sliding papers in front of Col. Blake. Just sign here sir.
(no message)
This is the perfect analogy (except Col Blake was with it).
(no message)
He probably pardoned several of his staffers’ crazy cousins.
(no message)
What Biden staffer wouldn't slip his family onto one of those pardon lists?
(no message)