Welcome to the Stasi’s “The Lives of Others” tattletale rules of our new government ….
Replies to: Welcome to the Stasi’s “The Lives of Others” tattletale rules of our new government ….
You’re surprised, he said everything he was going to do and is now doing it. Shocking
(no message)
Not surprised at all. Kamala was an easy choice.
(no message)
We agree for a change. Want him to do all of it. Take yer medicine America. Only way to come back to
your senses.
Exactly. America needs a “tough love” lesson.
(no message)
Wait for the MAGA buyer’s remorse when the consequences of the tariffs and mass deportations hit.
(no message)
Re: You’re surprised, he said everything he was going to do and is now doing it. Shocking
You must have not been listening.
DJT isn't even trying to hide his authoritarian agenda...the Bolsheviks would give him a thumbs up..
next, family members will be required to rat out each other to make sure there is no opposition to anything he orders or says.
The only "Whistleblowers" allowed in Trump's administration are those who rat out 'non-conforming' employees...regardless of the grift and non-Constitutional actions being undertaken.
Link: https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/archives/intn.html
Like I said, I want him to do it all. We all need the lesson in what stupidity wroughts.
(no message)
Exactly. It is entertaining watching our Trump loyalists pretend it’s anything else.
(no message)
Remember the COVID Tattle-Tale Hotline in liberal cities? It was awesome!!
"Hello Comrade Garcetti: Calling to report 2 additional cars in my neighbor's driveway this Memorial Day Weekend.....I can even smell a barbecue grill!"
And the “adverse consequences” for not using the hotline?
You voted for a Stasi led America that presumes people who are “diverse” are unqualified, yet presume that everyone else is qualified.
No thanks. I view diversity as America’s strongest attribute.
If you move people to the head of the line based on immutable characteristics, it's discrimination.
You are simply reframing discrimination as diversity.
Unresponsive. What were the “adverse consequences” for not calling hotline?
Answer: There were no adverse consequences or threats for not calling the hotline.
Now contrast Trump’s Order that demands federal employees to tattle tale (or suffer adverse consequences) on other employees and agencies conducting underground DEI operations.
It reminds me of Authoritarian governments during WW II and Cold War, encouraging snitches to identify Catholics who were attending secret masses.
Requiring that government officials report illegal activity under their purview. How dictator-y!!!
(no message)
I don't have a problem with a duty to report discrimination.
(no message)
He knows this.
(no message)
Holy shit! An agency is asking employees to flag actions contrary to stated policy?
Next you’ll tell us IRS employees should report colleagues who initiate unlawful audits or something. What’s the world coming to?
Except if Trump is the person engaged in illegal conduct?
A 2016 security breach on a classified phone call? Really? Well ok…..
…….the WB who leaked this false, and politically motivated Deep State attack on Trump still reported it. Even wrong, the WB reported it.
Trump is merely asking for honest reporting of illegal activity.
Btw, I will regular be asking for sourcing from MSM sources. I am not speaking to the legitimacy of the claim, but am in need of confirming the actual and accurate exist of the claim given the track record of the MSM. I don’t want to give credence in any way to false claims nor do I want to waste time.
He can do what he wants. Joe just proved that with all his pardons.
(no message)
Yes, fed employees are being asked to report illegal activity in the workplace (SCOTUS ruled DEI
to be an illegal discriminatory practice last June 2024).
Those who discriminate are always loathe to give up their practice.
Paywall.
(no message)
Reuters:
They didn’t list their source at all! Did the NYT list their source?
I recall a lots of false leaking last time (which I would expect at the start this time).
These MSM sources have proven multiple times that they are willing to bend a story with their journoactivist, so before I can address the issue, I need to know their source.
I also noted a very pro - DEI bent to the Reuters article with an incomplete and false description of what DEI programs are. There was no mention of their exclusion based on physical characteristics such as color and gender.
It makes no mention of the recent SCOTUS ruling either which makes such behavior illegal.
Yes. The White House. Ferret out “incompetent” DEI hires. Retain/promote “competent” non DEI hires.
Trump’s own words about “merit” which we all know is horseshit.
Good news for the slugs who do appear to be “diverse.” Bad news for America that we will not have the best and the brightest in Government.
Can someone please report the DEI hire on the SCOTUS? The one who was the VP was already
Fires by the American people.
No,to ferret out those discriminating in their hires based on race/sex. Very reasonable.It’s the law
You just don’t like the law. You want to help a person based on their race or gender or gender preference at the expense of depriving a person based on race or sex or gender preference.
The ends do NOT justify the means as you believe (Liberalism Rule # 3 “We know what is best, thus the ends justify the means”).
The “WH” is a “what”, not a “who”. “Anonymous sources”? Regardless….
…..DEI is illegal as is all discrimination based on race, gender, etc.. The SCOTUS was very clear about this being the case last June 2024.
All federal workers should be responsible for reporting illegal activity in the workplace. That is not new.
Your problem is that you think discrimination is ok, and you are not accepting of the law of the land so you want to discard it like a true liberal (though you expect complete compliance with other laws that you prefer. For example
Your own administration sought to punish doctors, nurses, and pharmacists who would not participate in the killing of unborn human life for example).
You are complaining about what people chose in this election which is to recognize the illegality of DEI and to eliminate it. Ending discrimination has never been easy. You cling to it bitterly with antipathy toward others who don’t agree with you.
See attached “Appendix 1”. This is Stasi playbook.
(no message)
Link: https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/OPM%20Memo%20Initial%20Guidance%20Regarding%20DEIA%20Executive%20Orders.pdf
Progress! Moron Dems no longer citing Hitler. It’s the Stasi now.
(no message)
Ok. Thank you. Now my response to it…..
…..DEI is illegal as is all discrimination based on race, gender, etc.. The SCOTUS was very clear about this being the case last June 2024.
All federal workers should be responsible for reporting illegal activity in the workplace. That is not new.
Your problem is that you think discrimination is ok, and you are not accepting of the law of the land so you want to discard it like a true liberal (though you expect complete compliance with other laws that you prefer. For example
Your own administration sought to punish doctors, nurses, and pharmacists who would not participate in the killing of unborn human life for example).
You are complaining about what people chose in this election which is to recognize the illegality of DEI and to eliminate it. Ending discrimination has never been easy. You cling to it bitterly with antipathy toward others who don’t agree with you.
Your first response should be to acknowledge the accuracy of The NY Times reporting.
Your next response, as a so called Catholic, should be to condemn the Trump Administration for deliberately trying to target “diversity” government employees or prospective employees as unqualified because of their diversity.
That’s what’s going on.
As a Catholic, the ends do not justify the means. Favoring a group at the expense of another is evil
You cannot fix a wrong by doing another wrong.
I also note that you have conceded the legal argument to me.
Btw, please note that your liberalism has superceded your Catholicism here.
You adhere to liberalism Rule 3 The ends justify the means (because you consider yourself smarter than everyone else) even when Church doctrine clearly condemns this concept as wrong. This isn’t even a Pope Francis vs Pope John Paul type of thing. This is doctrine.
You wish to help one group at the expense of harming another. Evil.
And again, thank you for conceding the legal aspect of this to me. The DEI hiring practice is illegal in the constitution (all men are created equal), and this was confirmed by the SCOTUS in June 2024 yet again. MLK also believed in this.
Be very careful of the secular humanism tendency in your belief set. No one is capable of making different rules from God’s. You are not smarter. God DOES exist and HE DOES MATTER. He makes the rules. A person should avoid the hubris that leads them to think that they can apply a different set of rules.
The ends do not justify the means.
He is a joke, not a Catholic.
He loves losing as you can see.
Sadly yes. You’re on the money as usual.
(no message)
Supporting an unrepentant Felon, Rapist, Assaulter of Women, Coveter, Cheat, Liar, Fraud, etc.
brings your own Faith into serious question. No person of faith can possibly support Donald Trump, since all of those offenses are documented truth. The "Joke" is on you for being so gullible...and faithless.
You seem really disturbed today. Take a refresher like the professor. It will do you some good.
(no message)
Why would anyone be disturbed when sharing the truth?...unless you can show what I've said is not
the truth, I'll continue to draw satisfaction in doing just that.
.
(no message)