Replies to: Damn.
conor's favorite lament: oath breaking.
from the letter of termination:
"You lost sight of the oath that you took when you started at the Department of Justice by suggesting that you retain discretion to interpret the Constitution in a manner inconsistent with the policies of a democratically elected President and a Senate-confirmed Attorney General."
Only posters like you and Tampa believe that Ms Sasson violated her oath.
Tell us when Mr. Bove is going to stand in a courtroom and explain to a federal judge why the Department of Justice seeks to dismiss the case.
It is not based upon lack of evidence or legal issues.
Why a dismissal “without prejudice?” That means DOJ can resurrect the charges.
Why doesn’t Trump just issue a pardon if the prosecution was “political?” Because Trump and Mayor Adams cut a deal: cooperate with Trump’s mass deportation agenda in exchange for the mayor’s criminal case going away.
That is the politicized justice system you endorse.
bookmark.
and, fyi, there are a few more than tampa and me.
over 77.000.000 million and growing.
you had your chance and blew it.
yield.
Haha! Nice!
(no message)
Have at it. Ms. Sassoon really seems like a liberal, huh?
Imagine if you had her integrity.
Imagine if Pam Biondi had her integrity.
Link: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/who-is-danielle-sassoon-prosecutor-who-stood-up-trumps-doj-over-eric-adams-case-2025-02-14/
You are a little late, Pam Bondi already has the job, so you can
go back to chasing slip and falls and parking lot accidents.
I'm sure there are millions more like us. Just look at the last election. You remember that, right?
That was the day the sun started shining for America again. Jesus was happy that day!
Thank you for acknowledging that Trump’s DOJ is politicized.
So much for the DOJ’s longstanding commitment to enforce the law “without fear or favor.”
You're welcome. We're just playing by the rules the last admin put in place that. You know
the one you supported. Why the pearl clutching now?