Be proud America!
Replies to: Be proud America!
A lot of things "could" happen. We should cry like babies about them all now.
After all, they might not happen later, and if they don't happen, we can't make political hay from them.
Vance criticized free speech in Europe. Here a reporter is banned for using Gulf of Mexico?
He also criticized Germany's handling of the far right. I think they have a thorough understanding of the far right.
So, I looked into this. He criticized restrictions on free speech in Europe. Strange post by you.
(no message)
Germany’s handling of the far right is a much bigger problem to Europe than Xi or Putin.
Can’t make it up. This is what we are as a nation in the year 2025. He’s just a reflection of it.
Explain what you mean by "banned."
We have daily press conferences by the president, taking all questions, instead of calling on people selected for him, who have pre-selected questions, which is unprecedented transparency even over and above the years of Biden.
A subset of reporters are invited to the Oval Office due to size. One reporter, whose agency insists on being political against Trump on this petty issue (after going along with Obama's renaming of natural features, and Biden's renaming of military bases), is no longer invited to the Oval Office. As far as I know, this reporter and the agency are still allowed to attend the larger press conferences.
Maybe there is more to the story than I have heard. But it sounds like saying the reporter was banned is an exaggeration to say the least.
Most likely heard it on MSNBC.
(no message)
Sarcastic? Your subject doesn't match the antiAmerica link. Typical Conor post.
(no message)
I would love to see you and the prof in a room with the Tkachuk Brothers.
(no message)
Did you skip mass today?
(no message)
Link: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gib6WIgwgGo
Sounds like he is posting about his weird sexual fantasies again
(no message)
Says a guy who supports sexualization of middle schoolers by voting Democrat.
(no message)
Conor posted about salad tossing this week. I guess you missed that.
(no message)
Conor is another board favorite who is held to a different standard on this board
(no message)
Any sexual fantasies are on your part.
I just want the Tkachuk Brothers to “have a spirited conversation” with you two milquetoasts.
I was there. BTW, any true Catholic knows that “Mass” is capitalized.
(no message)
(chuckling)
Like anyone here takes conor for an actual Catholic. Not even conor does.
Actually practicing Catholicism is much more than Grammar…try it sometime.
(no message)
Have you donated to Luigi Mangione's defense fund?
(no message)
I assume you're alluding to the subject of the linked article...my answer is No...and as for Trump,
our Judicial System has already convicted him on Fraud charges and he has three other major Felony indictments awaiting trial when he leaves office. For Justice sake, I want to see him stand trial and let the entire country see the evidence that produced those indictments. As a law abiding citizen, I trust that you want the same.
Link: https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/internet-links-trump-039-s-cryptic-quote-to-ceo-murder-suspect-luigi-mangione-7723327
Wow, that one will leave a mark
(no message)
Says the guy who disregards Doctrine in favor of polling; picks at words from Pope to lie about him.
(no message)
Let's start another thread that focuses on this issue so that everyone can see it and participate...
but for the moment...let's review a few things...first, Pope Francis has not recanted his statement that the Personhood of a Fetus is still Debated. He could have said...after centuries of Catholic Theology and writings that Personhood begins at Conception...he didn't....therefore, it is not Doctrine...and others who have written in dissent with regard to Francis' statement, admit that (I and others have posted one person's paper on the issue).
Secondly, there is a reasoning process within the RCC called "Prudential Judgement" that is used to deal with difficult decisions...such as the concept of "Just Wars" which involve "Sanctioned" Killing of others. Those exact words "Prudential Judgement" are in the RCC Catechism (Par 2309).
Given that a forced or coerced pregnancy on a woman is undeniably an attack on her with life changing...or even ending...consequences...the use of "Prudential Judgement" by a practicing Catholic should allow her the ability to make a choice between carrying the pregnancy to term...or not.
As for polling...when ~90% of even practicing Catholics, never mind all the other citizens of the U.S., who practice other faiths...or none at all, agree that under the circumstances I mentioned, women should indeed have that option...a society (government) that exists to serve the best interests of the majority, especially a vast majority, needs to listen to them and ensure their belief is honored...and not put impediments in the way of that decision. BTW...the leadership of Baron's OB/GYN Specialty organization (ACOG) has consistently and strongly argued for women's freedom to have the choice of abortion...so there's that perspective as well. I doubt that anyone could in good conscience call them "Baby Killers".
Think about what I've said before you reply.