D's dying on DEI hill of boys beating up girls. It really is part of their religion along w abortion
Replies to: D's dying on DEI hill of boys beating up girls. It really is part of their religion along w abortion
The trans issue is essential to the whole LBGTQP+++ agenda.
The 1% thing is a canard
The key % is whatever the whole LGBTQP+++ percent might be. And this number is much higher in the academic, media, entertainment communities that are so visible everywhere
Is the “agenda” to live a peaceful and fulfilling life like everyone else?
(no message)
Pretty much in the same way B.L.M. "just wants equality."
(no message)
No, it's to get special privilege for them and to force their ideology on everyone else's children.
(no message)
Here’s your America, Baron:
Pivoting to ICE? Ok. Here’s your America, conor: Laken Riley’s frantic call for help.
(no message)
Link: https://nypost.com/2024/11/15/us-news/murdered-nursing-student-laken-rileys-horrifying-911-call-played-in-court-leaving-her-mom-in-a-flood-of-tears/
I suppose there are people who give a shit about this.
You, I guess.
But I don’t know any of them.
Of course the Dear Leader brings it up now, to distract the imbeciles.
But nobody actually cares.
You may want to tell the Governor of Maine. She seems to care a lot about this.
(no message)
Oh, so you no longer care about DEI?
(no message)
College professor in the social sciences hides behind ignorance on major social issue.
You probably didn't even know Maine was a state!
Dictators order laws changed. Over reach here. [N.B. I do not support trans in girls sports.]
(no message)
I've posted this before: Scott Galloway and Konstantin Kisin.
If the Dems want to have a viable political party going forward, they should listen to Scott.
Link: https://youtu.be/qpBnYB0I6_0?si=QfsFVLSe0FM0J2es
Thanks for the podcast...watched all of Scott Galloway's comments...a little of Kisin's...and almost
none of Daniel's (he didn't say much)...if you're interested, I'll give you my comments on any of the topics covered.
Yes, feel free to share.
(no message)
On Scott Galloway's comments...
>Social Media Companies...since SMCs use 'Algorithms' to amplify opinions beyond what the "Organic" response would naturally be, they are in essence "Editorializing" and therefore should not be shielded from Accountability by "230 Protections"...just like Legacy Media are vulnerable to charges of Slander and Defamation. Scott is calling for a "Middle Ground" on this topic...and I agree with him. What's your take?
>Manhood...Scott sees that quality in terms of "Protecting"..."Providing For"...and "Serving" others...not simply Opposing outsiders. I liked the vignette about his 2-3 yr old son...on his own volition...trying to heft a pitcher of water and pouring it for guests at the dinner table...i.e. seeing his role as a "Provider" and "Server" to others.
In another back and forth, when Konstantin mentions his 2 yr old and what he tells him...Scott notes that his kids are 14 and 17, and comments that he really doesn't believe anyone can really "Tell" kids that age...what to do, and make it stick...rather he believes that he needs to "Model" the behavior they should adopt with his everyday life.
I strongly believe in this as well. From my own life experience...when I was around 7 or 8 yrs old, we were living in an apartment in Queens, NY...my Dad was a pilot flying cross country, so he was gone for several days at a time...I now had a younger brother and my Mom needed some help...so they hired a Black woman as a helper. My Mom treated her as more of a friend than an hired hand...and made it very clear that whatever the woman said or asked of me, I was to do it without question. Just by the respect and appreciation my Mom displayed toward her, naturally every day, I learned to treat others like that woman the same way...to this day.
That's it for the moment...what did you get out of the podcast?
It’s emblematic of the orthodoxy they foist on the public. Also why they got smoked in the election.
This doesn’t reflect the desire or beliefs of the people.
True, but they're also trying to appease every subset of their voting population.
At the individual level, most leftist politicians know that any action that pivots against the alphabet community risks their ire and increases the chances of getting primaried by some lunatic.
I’m A-ok if they stick with that strategy. I’m concerned with my kids getting jobs not free tampons
In men’s rooms. Dems seem to be more interested in setting people against each other.
I just can’t comprehend anyone thinking it’s ok for a bio male to compete against a female in sports
(no message)
Tyrone and LanceHarbor are the only ones I know of that vocally support this.
The rest are typically silent.
I've posted more that once my support for Olympian Swimmer, Donna De Verona's perspective on
Transfemale athletes competing against cisgender females...no competition if the Trans athlete has begun Puberty...and more study is needed for transitioning before that.
Beyond that, we're talking about fellow human beings who through no fault of their own are trying to deal with Gender Dysphoria and live as happy and productive lives as possible. They need understanding and acceptance for who they are...and definitely not harassment and/or persecution, such as posters here demonstrate.
I'm more than a bit surprised at your lack of acceptance for someone who's 'different' than most others.
This, lawfare, and collusion to hide Biden’s dementia broke the machine.
(no message)
.95% ruling safety of females, soooo f’d up
(no message)
Hurt feelings are just as bad as broken bones in their world, unfortunately
(no message)
I agree. I won’t support males competing against females…
I remember hearing about a trans female fighting a biological female in an MMA bout. Well, the biological female suffered a broken orbital bone and smashed nose among other injuries. I believe it ended her career.
There are other things that bother me as well.
There was a trans Olympic boxer who won the gold medal and dangerously beat the overmatched woman.
You say you won't support it, yet for vote for Kamala Harris/ Walz (or whatever Dem the radical Left leading the Dem Party allow to be on ticket) does indeed support it.
Thus, your statement is not accurate.
I believe you completely when you say that you are against it, but you HAVE indeed been in support of it. If Harris were president, this would be pressured into the Law of the Land.
Link: https://nypost.com/2024/08/01/sports/imane-khelif-forces-opponent-to-quit-46-seconds-into-fight-after-gender-storm/
Wrong. I voted for the lesser of two evils (my opinion, of course)…
And I didn’t support all of her positions. That’s just dumb. You voted for Trump. Do you support ALL of his positions? If you do, you’re too binary brained.
I suppose that is fair given the greater issues involved. I was hung up on the word "support"
(no message)
I have no respect for that position at all.
None. Women and girls deserve their own space to compete safely and fairly in sports. I don't view this is anything that deserves any form of compromise or arbitration. It's simply a position that is immoral and illogical.