A long, long list of why Fauci isn't trusted by nonvaxed and why we need someone new.
Why would anyone oppose this if getting people vaccinated is actually their goal.. There are many examples here to support the distrust, and all the opponents to the idea have is "they wouldn't change their minds anyways" which means that they aren't even trying.
Now if your first goal is to keep a malleable "yes man" in the CDC to create policies at the WH bidding, then I guess you would have reason to oppose removing Fauci.
Link: https://twitter.com/DrewHolden360/status/1420526431512244227?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1420526431512244227%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fmedia%2Ftwitter-thread-fauci-cdc-contradictions
Replies to: A long, long list of why Fauci isn't trusted by nonvaxed and why we need someone new.
I cannot recall a single pubic official who I ever found more duplicitous and self absorbed.
He is actually evil.
You’re a lousy judge of character, and that goes to Baron too.
Hell, pretty much all you R’s are awful at it.
Amazing. Simply amazing.
(no message)
No he's not...even if you say so.
(no message)
Link?
(no message)
Quote from close family friend?
(no message)
You being a man of medicine should be the one everyone goes to for info
You’ve been right all along.
Wait, no you haven’t. You haven’t been right about anything in years.
Never saw a scientist flip/flop on 1 thing (mask) so many times. It only means he doesn't believe it
(no message)
Here is a Fauci lie
As reported in several previous articles, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — a division of the National Institute of Health (NIH) headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci since 1984 — has, for years, provided grants to the EcoHealth Alliance and others to conduct gain-of-function (GoF) research on coronaviruses.
EcoHealth Alliance, in turn, farmed out some of this research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), from whence SARS-CoV-2 appears to have emerged. In a May 11, 2021, Senate hearing, Sen. Rand Paul questioned Fauci on the NIAID’s funding of GoF research on bat coronaviruses, some of which was conducted at the WIV.
Fauci denied the charge, saying “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”1 It’s a curious denial, considering the NIH’s funding of such research has been thoroughly documented and can be easily double-checked.
Fauci is clearly and provably lying … to Congress, which is a crime … and he’s lying to the American public. ~ Ben Swann
When Paul asks Fauci if the NIAID funded Dr. Ralph Baric’s GoF research, Fauci claims Baric “does not do gain-of-function research, and if it is, it is according to the guidelines and is being conducted in North Carolina.” Paul shoots back, saying:
“You don’t think him turning a bat virus spike protein, that he got from the Wuhan Institute into the SARS virus, is gain-of-function? You’d be in a minority, because at least 200 scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group that it is gain-of-function.”
In the video above, Jimmy Dore reviews the apparent lies dished out by Fauci during the Senate hearing. In the Truth in Media report below, investigative journalist Ben Swann lays out some of the proof, showing Fauci’s dishonesty.
“What’s insane about this exchange is that Fauci is clearly and provably lying … to Congress, which is a crime … and he’s lying to the American public,” Swann says.
Again: you can’t get through the wall of stupid
You can get to the hesitant. Evidently vaccination rates are rising because lots of hesitant people are coming around.
But the dyed-in-the-wool stupids are not getting vaxxed no matter who is the messenger.
Anyone in Fauci’s position would have come under attack by the stupids.
Your position: “There is no solution”. Ridiculous (as it was with the economy in 2016).
The answer is there, it just is something you don’t want to do.
One would think you would at least say,”What is the harm in trying a different CDC leader”.
After all, you are the one who says leadership matters so often.
LOL - talking points clearly went out.
Have heard this from you and Conor today.
Problem: Some of the lowest rates are among blacks. These people are in the Democrat identity politics tent. How the hell do we spin this?
Eureka! Black folks need to be labeled “hesitant”.
White red state people are irredeemably stupid.
Tuskegee Experiment!
(no message)
2.0 !?!?
(no message)
3.0. How quickly we forget about the WB.
Some argue the network foisted on black people by white people was even worse than Tuskegee.
Again, there is a good NYT article about this
Hesitant vs. opposed. Those are the unvaccinated.
So why not a new CDC spokesman for the hesitant office leadership matters? And….
….why on Earth did you need the NYT to tell you there were people who were hesitant and could be convinced?!
You guys had your full hate on this past week assuming the worst of everyone who didn’t get the vaccine. Glad to see you realizing that isn’t true with the new jargon. Now, the next step (this will seriously be difficult for you) is to realize that the “hesitant” aren’t just black people, but white people also, and vice versa.
Either way, to reach the “hesitant”, we must have a new leader. And since Biden ain’t going anywhere, that means Fauci.
Well, of course there is!
I'll bet the author is still untangling from all the contortions.
It’s important to note that the “hesitant” do not trust Fauci in very large proportions….
……and as it pertains to my OP, libs have to realize that they have to convince these people to achieve more vaccinations. Thus, Fauci must go.
Fake news site
(no message)