Ethnic cleansing afoot.
Replies to: Ethnic cleansing afoot.
In unrelated news, a white South African freak is advising the president
(no message)
Correct spelling on Biggot please?
(no message)
"white"
Wow.
yeah, a genius trying to eliminate fraud and abuse. not at all like this previous admin guy:
he was in charge of nuclear materials and baggage claims. your guy.
Xenophobe.
(no message)
MAS is leading the charge about all the discrimination against white farmers in SA, A nation by the
way were 7% own more than 50% of the land. Wonder what race most of that 7% are?
That freak will be in the history books for innovation and advancement of the human race, you won't
(no message)
I dunno, give me some time.
(no message)
People that think like you have always been the problem, not the solution.
(no message)
Wow you’re so deep
(no message)
People who criticize others based on immutable characteristics are assholes.
(no message)
Elon was a Dem that supported Obama. There was never a bad word said about the guy.
He bought X and exposed the censorship that was going on. Now supports Trump and is showing the US what waste is happening with the government. All of a sudden, he’s a Nazi and a freak? Totally normal behavior from the Dems.
DEI for a certain race of South Africans?
(no message)
What should we expect from a President who welcomes White Supremacist, Nick Fuentes to dinner at
Mar-a-Lago?...This administration absolutely overflows with Racism...among a few other faults...
There's a reason why many posters remain steadfast in their support for Trump.
They are the same posters who endorse scooping up immigrants and summarily detaining and deporting them without due process.
so, here's what you all keep trying to obfuscate:
they skipped a step to start with. they did not enter legally through a port and be processed as specified under existing laws. therefore, they are illegal and have no standing and can be deported without further legal action or interpretation.
nobody is opposed to immigration, but everybody (including - maybe especially - you, counsellor) should be strong proponents of legal entry for legitimate reasons.
not closed borders, but controlled borders. it's called "sovereignty". without it, there is no country.
unless, of course, you have some insidious agenda......
67 -- the folks they are scooping up are here lawfully.
(no message)
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/28/rumeysa-ozturk-tufts-ice
people who are here lawfully should be accorded whatever rights they are due.
if they are suspected of violating u.s. laws on any level, they should be processed through the legal system appropriately. the case cited in your article could be complicated.
one thing is not complicated: the guardian is not a legitimate news source but 100% pure leftist propaganda. it even brags about that when it begs for your money. it is highly likely that the guardian has misrepresented or is misreporting a high percentage of what it's presenting because it will never print anything contrary to its political agenda.
Click on "newly amended petition" and tell us if deem her attorneys as "leftist propoganda."
it would appear on the surface that she has a case.
she is a candidate for due process.
tren de aragua, ms-13, those committing terrorist acts, etc..... no case. ship 'em.
They are all entitled to due process, some more limited.
If we allow a President to summarily detain and remove people for being labeled as “thugs” or “terrorists” or associates of same, … we create a dangerous slope.
There has to be a check for folks on US soil.
there were no checks employed for u.s. citizens against these illegals.
so who, exactly, are you providing protection for? the barack obiden administration summarily abandoned the citizens of this country with their completely illegal open border policies. we were, and still are, under attack. that is where the real miscarriage of justice resides.
The protection for US citizens is due process for these folks.
Our legal system does not operate as the “angry mass mob.” Rather, our legal system is designed to afford every reasonable due process protection for even the terrorist.
By doing so, we protect citizens from regime like treatment that East Germans suffered during the Stasi regime.
8 U.S.C. § 1227 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 8. Aliens and Nationality § 1227. Deportable aliens
(C)Foreign policy
(i)In general
An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.
(ii)Exceptions
The exceptions described in clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 1182(a)(3)(C) of this title shall apply to deportability under clause (i) in the same manner as they apply to inadmissibility under section 1182(a)(3)(C)(i) of this title.
Link: http://FindLaw.com - 8 U.S.C. § 1227 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 8. Aliens and Nationality § 1227. Deportable aliens - last updated January 01, 2024 |
fumble.
(no message)
Hmm, anything distinguishing about these South Africans from the 20K refugees who had been approved
before he took office, and he now refuses to let in? Just wondering for a friend.