(no message)
Link: 104% Tariffs Wednesday.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://danieldrezner.substack.com/p/american-foreign-economic-policy
(no message)
(no message)
that the market needs.
(no message)
that out.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I suspect that a brutally repressive regime can "dampen" the disappointments of its subjects far more effectively than can a democratic open society.
(no message)
(no message)
natural expiration. Our own version of brutally opressive regimes moved jobs to China for bigger yachts.
And if we wanted China to trade more fairly, a united front with Europe, Japan and South Korea would have been the way to go.
Instead we declared trade wars against everyone. Us against the world, baby!
We’re forcing countries to choose sides while we still can.
The downside is the Chinese take a much longer time horizon and many of our institutions are already compromised.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Which makes me laugh because there probably are, but none of them were on the ballot.
(no message)
Maybe you forgot about the spy balloon we couldn't shoot down, I haven't.
(no message)
(no message)
And they are only the enemy in the fever dreams of the hawk.
(no message)
(no message)
Out with Ukraine.
(no message)