Shouldn't due process go both ways? Let's have trials for all potential refugees before admittance.
(no message)
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-orders-trump-admin-immediately-resettle-12k-migrants
Replies to: Shouldn't due process go both ways? Let's have trials for all potential refugees before admittance.
Heard they taught the 5th & 14th Amendments at scUM Law, Counselor.
(no message)
Yes and also the relevant SCOTUS interpretations of the 5th Amendment.
"This Court has firmly and repeatedly endorsed the proposition that Congress may make rules as to aliens that would be unacceptable if applied to citizens.” Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510, 522 (2003)
Correct, but free speech isn’t one of them.
(no message)
You have a firm grasp on the issue, Curly
(no message)
The Due Process Clause protects the individual from the Government.
And such a proposal helps protect the people from disastrous government policy.
Use jurors of ordinary Americans hear the refugee cases prior to admittance. That would be democratic, would it not?
One more time for the slow people: Due process protects individuals from the Government.
But, if you believe having juries (with no experience or history in comparing/contrasting the merits of refugee cases) be the gatekeeper, please contact your member of Congress.
His/her staff will then log your name on the "batshit crazy" constituent list.
When I tell my Navy Seal congressman my idea, I will be sure to tell him that a guy in a vagina hat
told me that this idea is "crazy."
Deep thinker you are.
(no message)
UNCLE
(no message)
The Man From U.N.C.L.E.
(no message)
The brain wattage isn’t there to understand that concept.
(no message)
He's already on it
(no message)
The smooth brains sure love Fox “News”
The network for pretend patriots
Good faith question, hopefully will produce a good faith answer. Where is Trump admin lacking due
process in this situation?
Another idiot leftist judge appointed by Biden.
Go figure.