New research casts doubt on IPCC's forecasts and methodology (Warning: Ty counter-link coming)
“Our findings suggest that IPCC modelling fails to support the hypothesis that human carbon dioxide emissions have a meaningful impact on global climate temperatures."
Link: https://kestencgreen.com/PRESS_RELEASE_Net_Zero_No_Sense.pdf
Replies to: New research casts doubt on IPCC's forecasts and methodology (Warning: Ty counter-link coming)
The IPCC studies / conclusions are being challenged, for good reason
AI models trained on climate data and IPCC reports are concluding they are - in a word - nonsense.
Climate morons won't take this well.
EDIT: typo
Can't argue with the data...add this to Dr. Spencer's global temp. data posted earlier...
(no message)
I argue with data everyday, it's my job.
And the constant theme is that bad data is significantly worse than no data.
But you're not talking about data, it's accuracy, weight or relevance. You're talking about predictions based on models based on data. And to this point, they are total failures.
What do you make of the charts I’ve presented on satellite measured temps and
NOAA’s Mauna Loa CO2 concentration readings…given that virtually no one disagrees with the physics of Global Warming?
Show me a chart of predictions vs actual and I will gladly comment on it
(no message)
Hopefully you realize that this is an issue that requires Long Term Planning...can't wait for the
results to be clear as day before taking action. If you don't understand this, then that would explain the lack of concern in your posts.
There is no "Long Term Planning" you simp.
Humans as a species have demonstrated over our entire existence that we cannot mitigate, but innovate.
Au Contraire…after the 1973 OPEC Oil Embargo, France planned for…and built an energy grid
based on Nuclear Power…the same sort of “Long Term Planning” that Biden…and now Trump…are sponsoring. Why, you ask?…easy…a combination of Climate Change and less than 50 years of estimated Global Proven Oil Reserves retaining.
I’d suggest that you just continue to stay on the sidelines and carp to your heart’s content while long term thinkers do their work.
That is a great example of an innovation, not a mitigation.
As if those nuke plants will prevent France from experiencing global warming.
I've posted the link below a few times...apparently you haven't seen it...should answer all your
questions about our future energy options...
Link: https://www.withouthotair.com
Site last modified 2015, hilarious.
(no message)
The facts and the physics haven’t changed…you’re showing your willful ignorance.
(no message)
I've already posted Dr. Roy Spencer's Global Satellite Temperature Data for April, 2025 (see image)
...now check t979 starting point...in less than 50 years, the rolling data average has risen over 1deg C...and at this recent rate it's definitely headed north of 2deg C...which is far higher than your paper's "findings".
It's time to stop betting on outlier losers, Mark...like Dr. Harvey Risch, who got derided by his peers and superiors at Yale, as well as his Co-Editors at the Publication that produced his original paper...and none of them have retracted their conclusions. Even Dr. Risch had to apologize for his sloppy work...as did at least two of the study authors he opined on.
Oh, and when the 96% 'Impact Factor' publication NEJM stands behind a Study showing 95% C.I....you end up looking like Jim Carey asking 'Mary' if he still has a chance of going out with her, when you bet on the 5% chance the findings are inaccurate...seriously...get real.
You can always find outlier studies, Mark. That ls what you never understand.
How about sticking to the findings of 99% of studies rather than the few that happen to match your preconceived notions.
Crazy, I know.
Many great studies are novel. You look at their data and design and methods
With your stated preferred approach, I am starting to understand why you were ok squelching dissent, free speech, and scientific debate during COVID.
And this is not an isolated example to challenge the PC group think of global warming.
I would love to hear both sides on this in a back and forth. And I am always very suspicious of anyone who prevents it.
PS - when you take out the US funded freebies of Paris Accord
No one is interested in pursuing this.
In fact, the accords fall apart without funding it / ie it is not seriously taken
Over 190 countries, including China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, not to mention
well. Scientifically versed countries like Britain, Japan and South Korea all acknowledge human burning of fossil fuels as the cause of Global Warming….enough so that they are changing their energy sources for heat and power. But Narcissists like Baron and his Avatar cling to their uneducated contrarian stances.
Meanwhile, the world hasn't even peaked on burning wood, much less fossil fuels.
Even if you're right this time, unlike all the predictions that have come and gone awry, uber-rich and connected people continue to buy beach front property.
Here's a real estate analyst's summary of the FLA housing market...she's seeing a downturn in beach-
front home sales...insurance cost's are skyrocketing...people are either moving inland, or leaving Florida altogether...any guesses as to why? Note that the Insurance industry has already done their own "Long Term Planning"...and Global Warming/Climate Change is definitely on their list of concerns...what's holding you back?
You've boiled this conversation down to a random real estate chick you found on YouTube.
Congrats, I got nothing.
Trying hard not to overwhelm you, Cheeks…good luck with your data analysis.
(no message)