Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
0
Downvote this post.

Anyone else chuckling at the deficit advice being given by the Kardashians here?

Author: BaronVonZemo (59286 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 10:07 am on Jun 5, 2025
View Single

“You have to raise taxes…it’s the only way!”…..while these same libs support spending like a Kardashian and aggressively oppose every effort to cut govt spending and waste.

At this level of deficit, the only hope is to deregulate, stimulate the economy, and enact fair tariffs which will all bring in far more than a tax increase.

And without fixing the corruption and waste (the purpose of DOGE), whatever method is used, the money will be spent again instantly by these fools.


Replies to: Anyone else chuckling at the deficit advice being given by the Kardashians here?


Thread Level: 2

Until we reform Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, it is all just noise

Author: Nigel Tufnel (8008 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:33 pm on Jun 5, 2025
View Single

And the chances of reforming any of those programs is essentially zero.

Those three, plus interest payments, consume over 60% of the budget. Any politician who even hints at the most modest changes is vilified.

Ideally we would need a BRAC-style bi-partisan commission to author changes to these programs. Congress will never touch this.


'I define fear as standing across from Joe Louis and knowing he wants to go home early.' - Max Baer
Thread Level: 2

How about we just leave taxes where they are right now and begin negotiating more reasonable...

Author: Curly1918 (16298 Posts - Joined: Aug 30, 2017)

Posted at 10:59 am on Jun 5, 2025
View Single

retirement entitlements.

THAT is the heart and soul of this crisis.

We are paying benefits that were established when life expectancy was way way less than it is now.

Maybe we scale back what you can get at the present retirement age (and let those in their 60's supplement with part time jobs) and then increase it as folks get older and can no longer work.

There has to be a compromise solution BUT NO ONE DARES TO EVEN RAISE THE SUBJECT.


Thread Level: 3

Part of the problem is that age discrimination is alive and well.

Author: jakers (13811 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 3:54 pm on Jun 5, 2025
View Single

It's the easiest thing for employers to do. I've seen exceptionally qualified candidates in the back half of their 50's who get laid off struggle to find lateral roles and even gigs that are a slight step down. "Overqualified" is a perfectly acceptable legal basis to reject applicants. Quite often, the real reason is that they expect these folks to give them not a minute past their 62nd birthday. If the candidate is 60, companies often don't want to be backfilling the role again in 2 years.

Taking away that safety net is never going to be popular with voters over 45/50.

One of the "fair share" ethos that I fully support is removing the tax cap on Social Security withholdings. It's quite literally a regressive income tax rate to do it that way.


Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS