If this keeps us out of the war in a real way, i'm all for it
Replies to: If this keeps us out of the war in a real way, i'm all for it
MAGA will line up behind the Dear Leader if he joins Bibi in this idiocy
Their objections will wither away as they contemplate their chances in a primary against someone Trump endorses.
Someone that Trump endorses? You were telling us he was running for a 3rd term
And I had my hopes up.
Sense can come from the strangest places sometimes.
(no message)
The issue is can we stop Iran from getting nukes. If so, war is worth it. If not, it is not.
(no message)
How does that end, exactly?
The Iranians had not decided to go full-bore for nuclear weapons, no matter what Bibi says. That's according to our intel agencies...and it was the assessment of the Mossad until Bibi told them to shut up.
Do you favor attacking Iran occasionally in perpetuity? Do you favor a major ground war trying to affect regime change?
How does this end, exactly, if we get in?
Dunno. How would it have ended if the US never entered WWII?
(no message)
Either with the Soviets or the krauts dominating all of Europe. And a militaristic Japan
dominating the Pacific. Jeez.
I think you meant this for Chris below.
(no message)
Nope. Just answering the question. Which has zero relevance to this subject.
(no message)
Typical nonsense
(no message)
You are fine with "Death to America" Iran having nukes. Agree that is nonsense.
(no message)
Iran wouldn’t even be close to having nukes save for the stupidity of the dear leader.
We wouldn’t even be close to being forced into this war without the stupidity of Bibi and the dear leader.
JCPOA would expire this year. Iran would have nukes, funded by us.
(no message)
It would be up for renewal and wrong.
(no message)
You are so ridiculous claiming to know what our intel service knows when leaders
of countries of the intel services you wuote say the opposite.
You are a fool to have assisted these terrorists. The moment they get nuclear capability we are in deep shit, and we all will know it.
You are a radical liberal, pro-Islamic, anti Israel MSN news watcher who was educated by fellow liberals.
Your schtick is to pretend that you have expertise, and when facts are placed before you, you sidestep them.
You also are incapable of accepting when you are wring and thus are unable to learn.
Iran has been moving toward this for decades. We need to act because THIS war threatens the US directly. They have already indicated their intentions.
I agree. Iran has aggressive intentions with their nuke program….
A lot of their nuke research was hidden from inspectors when the Obama “nuke deal@ was put in place. The world cannot trust these extremist savages.
Correct. We should take them at their word.
If they want nukes, a condition has to be that they never orchestrate a chant of "Death to America" again. They need to stop threatening to destroy other nations.
I think we all understand why someone named Death would support Iran.
Not wanting US involvement is supporting Iran?
That quite the stretch. Try harder
Like most of these weak minded Liberals, they jumped to Iran’s defense because Trump is
Against them. It doesn’t matter the topic, they will take the direct opposite side of Trump. It’s truly a sickness.
You really aren’t very bright
All you people talked about was how Trump was the anti war, pro peace president. Get back to us when you have an educated opinion.
Bullshit
Iran isn’t a threat to the US and no one should be supporting joining the war. Absolutely ridiculous.
…
(no message)
I disagree. Iran intended to assassinate US politicians and…
US diplomats. Iran is trying or was trying to develop nukes. Both are direct threats to the US as Iran is a sworn enemy of ours.
Having said that, the President does not have the authority to go to war with Iran without congressional support.
That’s pretty weak reasoning considering threats have been made for decades
Iran isn’t anywhere near powerful enough to challenge the US and you know that, getting a nuke isn’t going to change that. They’re certainly not stupid enough to launch it. They’d be annihilated before it reached its target. There isn’t any verified intelligence that they are any closer to achieving their goal. The US should stay out of it.
Weak? The assassination attempts were thwarted…
and forgive me, but I don’t trust Muslim savages who are stuck in the 8th century. Iran is one of the biggest state sponsors of terrorism. They have far reach because of their proxies.
Who said we should trust them? We’re talking about evidence to suggest we should enter a war.
Where is that evidence? If assassination attempts were cause for it, we would have done so at the time.
You said that Iran isn’t a threat to the US…
And I listed reasons they are. We will have to agree to disagree.
My hope is that war isn’t the answer, but if it is, we need to bomb them back to the Stone Age.
Iran isn’t a real threat to the US
Their military capability is nowhere close to the US’. If they were a real threat, we’d have gone to war instead of placing sanctions. We’ve been hearing about how close they are to obtaining a nuclear weapon for a long time now. Have you seen any evidence that would suggest they are on the brink?
Agree regarding military capabilities….
Here’s a quote from the attached Reuters article…”Iran was enriching uranium to up to 60% purity and had enough material at that level for nine nuclear weapons if enriched further, according to a theoretical IAEA yardstick..”
Iran is committed to wiping Israel off the face of the earth. We have thousands of troops in the region. Yes, a nuclear Iran is a threat to the US and our interests.
You alluded to having served. What branch and what was your MOS?
Link: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/how-close-is-iran-having-nuclear-weapons-2025-06-18/
It looks like Allah has forsaken the mullahs and war will not be necessary
THAT would bring peace to the entire Middle East
Link: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/06/downfall_of_the_ayatollahs.html
Hear hear
(no message)