I think Tulsi has some explaining to do.
Feels like "WMDs" in justification for Iraq.
Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c056zqn6vvyo
Replies to: I think Tulsi has some explaining to do.
What she says now is Mossad intel. No any US Intel agency have intel saying Iran is within weeks,
Even within months to make nuclear bombs.
But it doesn't matter anymore unless AOC requests her for hearing in congress.
She clarified this several days ago. They must want to distract from Trump's great success in Iran.
(no message)
I'm not convinced the bombing was necessary.
And the chain of events this could kick off is concerning.
The IAEA said they were busting past the redline, and they are a terrorist state. Trump did a great
service to the world.
This alone was worth his election. Iran with the ability to make nukes was a huge danger.
IAEA had more access and visibility to Iran's sites under the JCPOA.
(no message)
Heh. No, they simply stopped hiding and used all of their facilities. This explains all....
...get someone to read and explain it to you.
Link: https://centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Iran_JCPOA_paper_final-1.pdf
The U.S. and IAEA already knew about Iran's plans...yet they were still in compliance wrt U-235
enrichment, which was the critical element (no pun intended) of the JCPOA...from the attached article on Mossad's Stolen Documents...
------------------
Journalists from the New York Times and other U.S. outlets and inspectors from the IAEA confirmed that the documents demonstrated Iran had previously worked to develop nuclear weapons, despite the country's insistence that its nuclear program was only for civilian purposes. British and American officials confirmed the authenticity of the trove.[2] The documents also documented then-Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's membership of a Council for Advanced Technologies that approved the program and indicated that the IRGC and Quds Force played supporting roles.[11]
The U.S. had previously known of Iran's nuclear weapons research before 2004, and the documents contained no revelations about recent nuclear activity.[3] According to journalist Yonah Jeremy Bob and nuclear expert Jeffrey Lewis, much of the key contents were already reported in past IAEA reports. However, the trove provided more clarity about Iran's specific goals for its arsenal,[12] and it proved that Iran violated the JCPOA, which prohibited Iran from engaging in any research and development activity and required full disclosure of all of Iran's nuclear program, including documentation.[13]
------------------
Ergo...There was no sound reason for DJT to pull out of the JCPOA and thus allow Iran to begin enriching past 3.7%, up to weapons grade...as they did once he pulled us out...unless, he supported Bibi's goal of creating a pretext for military action, rather than the peaceful path within the region toward a Two State Solution that Biden helped broker with Saudi Arabia, et al.
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossad_infiltration_of_Iranian_nuclear_archive
Baron's reference is a Far Right, Muslim Hating Group...the IAEA is on record finding that Iran
was in compliance with the terms of the JCPOA...Baron wants to have it both ways...
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Security_Policy
Fleitz is a total crackpot and neocon who has wanted war with Iran for decades
(no message)
He is quoting Netenyahu who is quoting Mossad intelligence- the best in the world.
I'm guessing you don't believe this info as a guy with your perspective. But really, no one is in a better position to know than Netanyahu. Thus, you will discredit Netanyahu - am I right?
Sounds like Baron's kind of guy...straight from a "Dr. Strangelove" casting call...
(no message)
Plus, if Pakistan can have nukes, why can't Iran?
(no message)
Do you think Trump signed the "Massive Ordnance Penetrator" bombs before deployment?
Hopefully, this is the end of it.
Why? Lying and back tracking is perfectly acceptable in MAGA world.
(no message)
Was behind on reading memos, most likely
(no message)