It’s all sadistic OCD.
...they are backtracking, and their excuses are damning as well. The NYT is claiming that they reached out to the Mamdani campaign first before running the story to run it by them (not a courtesy ever done for Trump).
They claim "we like to run these things by the first hand source before running them". They also are saying that they wouldn't run it if Mamdani gave them an good explanation. They most certainly would run this story against a Republican regardless of their explanation, and there is no good explanation for it.
But the best part is that NYT claims that they were hacked and that is how the story got out.
Maybe it was Russia?
(no message)
Before coming all unglued, let’s see if he can win a Mayoral election and then produce results that benefit ALL New Yorkers.
"Whether it's BDS or whether it is the end goal of seizing the means of production."
The level to which you simp yourself out for these clowns is breathtaking. He's so bad for the Democrat party that the NYT is trying to torpedo him. He tried to get into Columbia by claiming he was black. He's a shameful jackass and you are busy polishing his nob.
are really concerned about living under an Authoritarian government, look no further than than Donald J. Trump and MAGA pols who follow him...
Back to Mamdani...he's very much focused on reducing the Wealth Disparity in NYC and make it more affordable for ALL New Yorkers...let's see if he gets elected and then judge how he manages the city....stop freaking out over this...your party has lawmakers retiring rather than follow Trump "over a Cliff".
He'll be the best thing to happen to the Republican party since you dopes nominated Kamala.
On a side note, it is amusng that you think everyone should ignore what the man actually says in favor of your interpretation of his words.
(no message)
Shame 98% of this board can’t seem to figure out why.
This place is lost.
See you in FB season…maybe.
(no message)
...you'd think AI links might be a warning, but I agree with Knute. These people are hopeless ....because they choose to be so. It's what they want. But they lost, so we at least have that.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)