UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

the 2016 Trump election campaign and Russia.

We've been through this more than once...campaign manager, Paul Manafort gave Trump campaign internal polling data to Russian operative, Konstantin Kilimnik...and Donald Trump Jr. met with Russian attorney Natalya Veselnitskaya for the purpose of getting compromising information on Hilary Clinton.

It's all in the Congressional Record...by any other name...it's still "Collusion" between Trump and Putin, through multiple intermediaries.


Link: https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/7039362-Senate-Intelligence-Committee-Russia/

(no message)

Polling Data to a Russian Operative, Konstantin Kilimnik, prior to the 2016 election?

(no message)

sharing of Trump campaign internal polling data from his campaign manager, Paul Manafort, to Russian Operative, Konstantin Kilimnik?

Smarter democrats knew this all along but played it aggressively to wreck a presidency...how patriotic.

The true dumbasses (see below) still think there is a tape somewhere.

data to a Russian Operative, Konstantin Kilimnik, prior to the 2016 election...if not with the word "Collusion"...or "Conspiring", or "Cooperating", or "Collaborating"...

We know what was going on...and it's Criminal...as well as Treasonous for Trump to be seeking assistance from America's worst enemy...who btw, thinks it would be in THEIR interest for him to be President. THINK about that...but first read the linked article

...here's an excerpt from the Lawfare Review of the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee Report...
--------------------
The fifth and final volume of the Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election is an incredibly long and detailed document. At a whopping 966 pages, volume 5 alone is more than twice the length of the Mueller report, and it covers a great deal more ground.


It is important for another reason: Along with the shorter volumes 1-4, the Senate’s report is the only credible account of the events of 2016 to which Republican elected officials have signed their names. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in a press release praised the report on the investigation he set in motion way back in December 2016, saying, “I commend my colleagues on both sides for keeping their work out of the partisan spotlight and focused on the facts.” McConnell, in the same press release, echoes the statements of Acting Committee Chairman Marco Rubio, stating that “[t]heir report reaffirms Special Counsel Mueller’s finding that President Trump did not collude with Russia.”


It is a bit of a mug’s game at this point to fight over whether what either Mueller or the Intelligence Committee found constitutes collusion and, if so, in what sense. The question turns almost entirely on what one means by the term “collusion”—a word without any precise meaning in the context of campaign engagement with foreign actors interfering with an election.


So rather than engaging over whether the Intelligence Committee found collusion, we decided to read the document with a focus on identifying precisely what the committee found about the engagement over a long period of time between Trump and his campaign and Russian government or intelligence actors and their cut-outs.


Whether one describes this activity as collusion or not, there’s a lot of it: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve some degree of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity. In this post—which we are generating serially as we read through the document—we attempt to summarize, precisely and comprehensively, what the eight Republicans on the committee, along with their seven Democratic colleagues, report that the president, members of his campaign and his associates actually did.


One overarching note: There is a fair amount of overlap between this document and the Mueller report. But the Senate report covers a fair bit more ground for a few reasons. For one thing, it was not limited to information it could prove beyond a reasonable doubt in court, as Mueller was. Just as important, the committee included counterintelligence questions in its investigative remit—whereas Mueller limited himself to a review of criminal activity. So the document reads less like a prosecution memo and more like an investigative report addressing risk assessment questions. This volume is an attempt to describe comprehensively the counterintelligence threats and vulnerabilities associated with Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. So it’s inherently a little more free-wheeling and speculative.
-------------------


Link: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/collusion-reading-diary-what-did-senate-intelligence-committee-find

There is no there there, moron.

(no message)

DJT will continue to do all he can to hide or discredit evidence of how deep he is with Putin...it's up to folks like us to keep putting the evidence in MAGA faces.

Link: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868/

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

And you voted for him.

Are juries ever contaminated or biased against a defendant?

(no message)

Now tell us about the 12 Anti-Trump jurors.

We gather you spoke with them after reading entire trial transcript, correct?

As a defense attorney and also a learned man, you're quite aware of human interpersonal dynamics and sociological-psychological influences. You know quite well how things can turn in among a jury. I should bring up the video of that one loopy, obviously biased grand juror.

Any chance the Manhattan jury who listened to the testimony, followed their oaths and found Defendant Trump guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?

chosen, which you well know.

(no message)

(no message)

Link: https://youtu.be/KpVm97rAhb0?si=F_oZAW2nuCInJydf

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

him from office. This was the answer to a teary-eyed Rachel Maddow on the night after the election in 2016 when she asked when she asked Obama officials, "what is "Plan B? There has GOT to be a Plan B".

We were right all along again....of course, as it was the only explanation that fit the facts.

I hope these guys face long prison sentences for treason if found to be dirty. I suspect that self avowed communist Brennan was smart enough to cover his tracks. But Clapper is no MENSA member, and Comey is very likely to have left his trail uncovered - if due to just sheer ego alone.

(no message)

(no message)

Lol

(no message)

That's how DC works. No one is doing the perp walk. No mugshots. Being an anti-Trumper in DC has its benefits.