From NY Times:
A Senate committee voted on Thursday to advance the nomination of Emil Bove III, the Justice Department enforcer who oversaw dozens of firings and the dismissal of bribery charges against Mayor Eric Adams of New York, to a lifetime post as a federal judge.
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously approved the nomination after Democrats stormed out in protest when the panel’s chairman, Senator Charles E. Grassley, called the roll before every Democrat on the committee had a chance to air their objections.
“Sir, this lacks decency,” said Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, his voice raised and visibly agitated. “It lacks decorum. It shows that you do not want to simply hear from your colleagues. This is absolutely wrong!”
Mr. Grassley ignored him and plowed on. In a voice vote, committee Republicans voted to confirm Mr. Bove, 44, to a lifetime appointment on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which encompasses Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.
The vote was a prelude for what is expected to be an even more intense battle on the Senate floor over a nominee seen by his many critics of the embodiment of the administration’s obliteration of institutional safeguards intended to shield the department from White House interference.
Mr. Bove is more likely than not to be confirmed, barring any new developments that will sway several Republican senators to reject a lifetime judicial appointment for a taciturn and unyielding former Manhattan federal prosecutor who swiftly rose to prominence after serving on Mr. Trump’s criminal defense team.
The vote came after Democrats waged a bitter effort to derail Mr. Bove’s nomination by persuading Republicans on the committee to buck the White House, which has pushed hard to place a reliable Trump loyalist with an expansive view of executive power to a critical federal appellate court.
In the days leading up to Mr. Bove’s appearance before the committee, Erez Reuveni, a former immigration lawyer dismissed by Mr. Bove for insubordination, came forward to assert that Mr. Bove had told subordinates he was willing to ignore court orders to fulfill the president’s aggressive deportation campaign.
On Wednesday, more than 900 former Justice Department lawyers signed a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee expressing “deep concern” about the nomination of Mr. Bove.
In the letter, the former department lawyers suggested that Mr. Bove had disgraced the department during his six months there, and that his confirmation would be “intolerable.”
Mr. Bove defended himself against such claims during a testy confirmation hearing last month, telling the committee that he was not “a henchman” and that he had acted lawfully during his brief but eventful tenure at the department. He also defended President Trump’s right under the Constitution to fire career prosecutors without providing evidence of their misconduct.
When pressed on his actions, Mr. Bove often refused to answer, citing attorney-client privilege and department rules against discussing ongoing investigations.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat from Rhode Island, ripped the Republican majority for failing to hold Mr. Bove to account for his actions.
“We can’t even get answers,” Mr. Whitehouse said, shortly before Mr. Grassley shut down the Democrats.
The entire process, he added in exasperation, “more resembled a rackets hearing from the Godfather” than a good-faith airing of the facts.
Mr. Bove’s deceptively modest title, principal associate deputy attorney general, belied his vast power in the department — derived from his close relationship with the president and Mr. Trump’s top domestic policy aide, Stephen Miller, who has played a central role in pushing the department’s maximalist anti-immigration agenda.
Because his post did not require Senate confirmation, Mr. Bove was among the first Trump appointees to arrive at the department, overseeing a succession of major policy and personnel moves, starting with a memo threatening to prosecute state and city officials who refused to carry out immigration enforcement.
But the most defining episode of his tenure was the battle he waged against his former colleagues in the U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York over the administration’s request to drop bribery charges against Mr. Adams — who had personally appealed to the White House for a legal reprieve.
Mr. Bove pressured top prosecutors in the office to drop the case. He claimed that the charges had been brought by an overzealous Biden-appointed U.S. attorney and argued that the case would hinder Mr. Adams’s capacity to cooperate with the White House on immigration enforcement.
The interim U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Danielle R. Sassoon, resigned rather than sign off on Mr. Bove’s command.
Mr. Bove’s current boss, the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, who served with him on Mr. Trump’s legal team, accused Mr. Bove’s critics of spreading slander and misinformation.
“Emil is the most capable and principled lawyer I have ever known,” Mr. Blanche wrote in an opinion article for Fox News. “His legal acumen is extraordinary, and his moral clarity is above reproach.”
(no message)
You can equivocate about what so and so feels personally, but this guy should not be a life time judge.
(no message)
(no message)
But I'm glad she's in the minority.
(no message)
(no message)
ACB knows her stuff. KBJ is a DEI hire. Everybody knows this.
Yeah of course I did.
ACB righteously called her out for ranting about an imperial executive in favor of an imperial activist judicial system.
Watch the English Cow Pie Championship
It’s you.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Take it up with The Independent.
(no message)
However, Cotton, Cruz, and other GOP members warned the Dems a couple years ago when Durbin curtailed this process that the worm would turn and they would eventually be in the minority and have to suffer under the new precedent they established. Predictably, they whine when the treatment they doled out is turned upon them.
(no message)
several absolutely awful judicial nominees, and Durbin and staff rammed through the votes without hearing from all the GOP senators on the committee. You reap what you sow.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
rival tribe and will happily support incompetents in your tribe.
It is worth noting, and a matter of public record, that while the Dems on the committee did not vote down a single Biden judicial nominee, Sens. Kennedy, Cotton, Graham, and other Republicans on the committee voted down several Trump Administration judicial nominees in Trump's first term who they regarded as unqualified. The Dems on the Judicial Committee are literal rubber stamps for Dem administrations, including voting for one nominee who didn't know what Article II of the Constitution concerns and another whose most serious case was a DUI case (That I believe she lost). Jokes. Now they whine about being steamrolled after steamrolling the Repubs in previous years? Hilarious.
(no message)
thing.
Keep up the good work
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)