So PEPFAR was spared (as we said valuable programs would be). 94 wrong again. But NPR?
Well, left wing propaganda is not valuable.
What happened to all of the libs here who were worrying about the deficit while the BBB was being debated? Why are they now against cutting govt waste? Hypocrites - it’s all about politics for them. It always is.
Replies to: So PEPFAR was spared (as we said valuable programs would be). 94 wrong again. But NPR?
Wait - I thought thousands would die?
The usual sensationalist rubes showed themselves again. Have there been any mea culpas?
Pretty sure I said they would if PEPFAR was canceled. And I was - and am - right.
Also, there is no point in trying to explain this. Nuance is never your thing.
"End of days!!!". Of course there are no mea culpa. He will just claim that I was wrong somehow.
(no message)
Thank God for responsible GOP Senators
And I wasn’t wrong in pointing out that millions would die if we cut it.
I am very happy that (much of) the funding was saved from Trump’s ideological cuts. But not nearly as happy as the AIDS patients.
I said that the valuable programs would be spared. You refuted it. You don't understand the process.
You were wrong.
Had there been ANY THOUGHT whatsoever before DJT's DOGE cuts, the Senate would not have had
to save PEPFAR. That's so easy to understand...but not for Baron.
So your hysteria was BS?
BVZ opined long ago that necessary funding would not be cut. Seems he was right.
The House bill cut the funding
Sorry if my concern for the lives of millions of people offended you.
Which was needed to get the bill to the senate who promised to exempt PEPFAR which then goes back to
the House where everyone knew that they would be able to pressure the votes after those who wanted to look as if they had no part in it could do so and now cave. Both sides do it. You don't know that apparently.
Is that how the legislative process works? Tell me more!
(no message)
I don't want to overload you. And yes, it might be on the test.
(no message)
Even CATO gets NPR right. Does the prof disagree?
(no message)
Link: https://www.cato.org/blog/npr-should-not-be-subsidized-taxpayers
“Even Cato”? And yes, I disagree.
(no message)
So you are saying CATO is wrong? Interesting. They must be full of crap I guess.
(no message)
First, it’s Cato, not CATO
And when I have I ever said I agree with Cato all the time?
You’re reaching a lot today.
Their own website capitalizes it. You obviously didn't read the link.
Have one of the adjunct scholars read it to you.
It's well thought out. Not your style, I guess.
It’s not an acronym. It’s named after Cato. You can trust me on this one.
(no message)
Then why do they capitalize it on their website? Are you saying they are even more full of crap?
(no message)
You can trust me on this one or not. I don’t give a fuck.
(no message)
You're nitpicking makes you look ridiculous.
I never said it was an acronym. I merely used their official logo designation.
If you don't like the logo, speak to someone in their organization about your deep and petty concerns.
Link: https://seeklogo.com/vector-logo/204992/cato-institute
It's not CATO. It's Cato.
Logo notwithstanding. It's named after Cato. Not like NATO.
I know you love the last word, but I know more about this than you do.
Link: https://www.cato.org/
I never questioned who it was named after. I never said it was an acronym.
I deferred to the logo.
Your inane chest-thumping atrocities and deep-seated resentment of your colleagues is duly noted.
Perhaps those in command at your Ministry of Silly Walks need counseling.
Tag along.