ODNI website official press release - "per the president's request"
After being presented with the legitimate IC assessment that the Russians didn't interfere we the 2016 election, there was a meeting with Obama, Clapper, Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, McCabe et al.
After the meeting on 12/09/16, Clapper's executive assistant sends out an email to the IC leaders tasking them with creating a new IC assessment “PER THE PRESIDENT'S REQUEST” that details the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” It went on to say, “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.”.
One has to assume that Obama is furious that one of his people linked him to his order in an email. One also has to assume that it was CYA by Clapper to link in Obama so that he wouldn't be caught holding the bag if it was discovered, and also using his exec assistant to create a little distance for himself as well.
Richard Nixon had John Dean ratting him out, and it looks like Barack Obama may have James Clapper.
Link: https://www.odni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2025/4086-pr-15-25
Replies to: ODNI website official press release - "per the president's request"
Hoping we get an Obama mugshot. Dems set the precedent after all.
(no message)
We were right about the corrupt IC “these are professionals” guys as well. “You don’t know how this
works” we were condescendingly told by the guy who actually didn’t know how the Obama IC worked.
Exhibit “A” MAGA voter.
When confronted with facts, you resort to name calling .
(no message)
You have never embraced "facts" -- only falsehoods fed to you by your right wing Mothership.
Yes, the Mothership who paid paid out $787 million to Dominion Voting Systems for false assertions in connection with the 2020 election -- falsehoods that you continue to chirp about.
The DNI provided evidence & referred the case to the DOJ against Obama, Clapper,Brennan,Comey, et al
These are legal sources and government facts.
Russia! Russia! Russia!
(no message)
...and then silence as they move on, hoping everyone forgets their falsehoods.
(no message)
Nobody is buying your DNC Daily Screech.
(no message)
No One should buy the screeds of someone who refuses to admit he posts under different usernames...
i.e. zero honesty or credibility for you, Aragoto.
The GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee's Report (Vol. 5) STILL finds that Paul Manafort handed
Trump Campaign Internal Polling Data to Russian Operative, Konstantin Kilimnik, prior to the 2016 election...among scores, if not hundreds of other exchanges between the campaign and Russia...not the least of which was Donald Trump Jr. meeting in Trump Tower with Russian attorney, Natalia Veselnitskaya, for the purpose of getting "dirt" on his opponent, Hillary Clinton.
Can't wait for Trump to resurrect that trove of verifiable evidence with his bluster.
By the way, your last post on Risch's paper allegedly being "refuted" made zero sense
You wrote that his colleagues "refuted" his paper and yet you provided a link PRIOR to when he actually wrote his paper...a paper in which he disavowed all bad pro-HCQ+ studies he previously cited and answered each and every of his colleagues' criticisms (not refutations, by the way) of his original Newsweek article - which is what they were criticizing in your link, not his research paper. And since he wrote his definitive paper, none of his colleagues have weighed in any further.
Ty, seriously, are you being this stupid on purpose? If not, you might want to see a doctor about possible dementia or Alzheimer's.
"...a paper in which he disavowed all bad pro-HCQ+ studies he previously cited..." Your words, Mark.
Think about what that means for his "Scholarship" and "Professionalism"...He doesn't get a "Mulligan" for shoddy work...not when millions of lives are at risk.
Sigh. Once more yet again you demonstrate zero logical ability.
The article he wrote for Newsweek was just that - an article. In that article, he cited as one but if evidence a flawed study that he did not know at the time was flawed. When he was doing research for his definitive paper - a paper none of his colleagues or peers ever weighed in on, contrary to your erroneous beliefs - he only cited reliable studies.
What's so hard to understand about that?
Risch did terrible work and got rebuked by his peers at Yale as well as his publication, Mark...you
just admitted it...learn to accept he's wrong.
btw, don't forget to include the Dean of Yale Medical School on your list of those you think are logically impaired ;-)...you've got a lot of Chutzpa making such claims.