Yeah Mango never drew pictures. And the cultists
stilll believe he didn’t assault over 20 women. Sickos.
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/18/us/politics/trump-drawings-epstein.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
Replies to: Yeah Mango never drew pictures. And the cultists
Bringing a lawsuit opens up the case for discovery. Would he want that if he were not innocent?
This story was run to distract from Obama being referred to DOJ for evaluation of criminal charges by the DNI.
The WSJ was used because it hasn't blown all of its' credibility like other MSM sources - but it has participated in the past at times, and it does have a large staff with many MSM ties.
It was very atypical of the WSJ to run this story since 1) it offers up a damaging claim without any way to prove the validity of it, 2) it did not contact both sides of the story to get opposing views - the Trump team was never contacted and their side not presented (the Trump Team did find out about the WSJ intent to run this at the last minute and were warned that it was not true, but they ran it anyways without verifying.
Now, history tells us what will happen next. There will be a years long legal process at the end of which the WSJ will retract the story and pay Trump a lot of money for libel.
In fact claims he never “wrote” pictures in his life
(no message)
Link: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-denies-epstein-birthday-letter-drawing-1235388615/
It's funny that that drawing is memorialized behind glass as a great work of art.
Remember when mom would post your finger painting on the fridge held up with magnets.
DJT's version.
Man child w/ 24/7 TDS. Better than Hunter’s spit paintings?
Close call. How are the tantrums working out for you slubs? Lol
The fundamental issue here is Trump’s denial of any close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein…
and you won’t even discuss it…looks to me like it forces you to make a moral judgement…and that frightens you.
Couldn't wait to change the subject, could you...what are the odds that Trump and Epstein are joined
at the hip for 15 years in search of "Beautiful Women...many on the Younger side"...and DJT either knows nothing about JE's pedophilia...or, just "watches"?
What direction does your 'Moral Compass' point you in?
IDK, you're the one who has all the inside dope. You tell us.
Why you shying away from Hunter's spit paintings? I just asked which is better, Hunter's slobber knocker spit paintings or DJT's alleged drawing? I added the part of the men child TDS tantrums that permeate this board. Pretty clever if I do say so myself. The accusations, name calling, threats, arson, flag burning, looting, murders, lawfare, assasination attempts, and anti-Jewish rhetoric by the TDS crowd isn't working and neither is whatever you're trying to do.
With all that's going on right now, you must be leaning one way or the other...did DJT participate
in sexually abusing girls "On the Young Side"...or not?...If not...why do you think that?
As for myself, hearing his "Access Hollywood" tape...watching his lecherous gazes in videos with Epstein...knowing that he cheated on his wife with a porn star...and spent at least 15 years in very close contact with JE, I'd say anyone could bet their house on him being guilty...then of course there's DJT's absurd denials that he never liked Epstein,
etc....me thinks he doth protest too much.
It's a simple and very relevant question...just answer it.
Frank & Jim need their Pee Pee Tapes story. It matches their own vulgarity while assuaging their TDS
(no message)
The underlying issue is the left here gets off on the thought of the tape.
The fact that the tape never existed doesn't matter. I'm telling you, these lefties are weird.
Yes, they project their own depravity.
(no message)
That tape is your 'Straw Man'...not even Steele claimed it to be verified fact...his 'Dossier'
never said that...one of his informants inside Russia felt strongly that it existed...but that was hardly the grounds for investigating Trump, et al...Turns out that the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee's Report proved beyond any doubt that there was cooperative interaction between the Trump campaign and Russia prior to the 2016 election. Vladimir Putin authorized a great deal of effort in order to support Trump's election...let that sink in...our worst enemy WANTS Trump to be President!. "Russia...Russia...Russia" is a real thing...not a Hoax.
Sounds like you’re still afraid to face reality. Hiding behind nonsense spin.
(no message)