No Dems will read this - it goes against what they want to believe.
But you can bet they know it's true anyways. They've known for a long time, and they think it was acceptable for Obama to do it because it was Trump - Liberalism Rule #3: The Ends Justify The Means.
That's why Dems and the complicit MSM will lean heavily into the Epstein story to distract. Despite the Dem infested SDNY having these documents since 2019 without ever leaking any Trump/Epstein ties during either presidential election campaign even though they leaked everything else possible and even made things up.
Also despite Joe Biden and Handlers never releasing the Epstein information either. They know that this is fake too, but if it can serve their purposes, they are all for it.
Link: https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/tulsi-gabbard-newsmax-obama/2025/07/22/id/1219687/
Are you not just a little bit suspicious?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I also don’t believe Obama will be charged with anything and that this is nothing more than Trump trying to change the narrative. It’s too bad that you’re too blind to be critical of Trump.
Woodford Reserve at the ND bar of your choosing on a game weekend.
The salaciousness of the story with a typed note and a drawing with the name "Donald over the pubic region of a girl and Trump conveniently telling Epstein that "We have much in common" along with "I wonder what it's like not to have everything"....come on.
The fact that this info sat with the SDNY in the heart of liberal intersection of law and politics - and it was never leaked or simply released through TWO elections?!!!.....come on.
How many of these stories do you have to hear from your MSM who has been caught lying time and again do you have to hear?
Then the timing of this....they knew Gabbard was referring Obama et al for charges...."Time for another Pee Pee Tape! And this one can't be from the Atlantic or NYT again - we'll call in our chips with the WSJ which has been there in a pinch for us in the past".
there are no “Epstein files.” Now you’re trying to reverse it.
Now, I’m not sure if Trump’s name is mentioned in the files or if he was a guest on Rape Island. I do know that Trump and his team are trying to divert attention. That’s a fact and it will be interesting to see the truth.
As far as Gabbard…she’s just trying to get back in Trump’s good graces after she opposed the Iran attack.
It is a common tactic.
The Epstein issue had been around and was percolating. The Dems had this waiting and undoubtedly got wind of what the topic of the announced PC was, and they threw this out there so none of the hard left would pay attention. The MSM then dutifully followed suit by not even mentioning the massive news story for a day, and then giving it less billing than Pee Pee Tapes 2.0.
Now how about explaining to me how the SDNY held onto something like this on Trump through two elections without a peep? Any guesses?
Now, I'll rip on Trump on another thing - the Golden Dome thing was already a stretch, but now he is petulantly trying to use a different company other than Space X because of his dissatisfaction with Musk. We cannot have any weaker alternatives for something with these stakes or this price tag....and that's if it's really feasible which is really iffy since tech is always advancing & we may break the bank on something that is obsolete by the time it gets ready to implement.
(no message)
released as part of trumps and republicans election speeches and promises. You mean that distraction your group has been raging about for months now where Steve Bannon, Nick Fuentes, JD Vance all called for transparency and release of report?
I guess the Obama Deep State has done it again and whipped the media into a foaming frenzy through FOX and pals.
You suck at contemporary history. MAGAmoronic logic at work again.
(no message)
(no message)
...they gave BHO a Nobel prize not based on merit, but because of their own racist views of the limitations of abilities of different races.
He's gotta make the history books for something beyond being the first black President.
I wonder what the next distraction will be.
It won't matter what it is, you won't even look at it.
BaronVonZemo's Rules of Liberalism:
Liberalism Rule #1 - accuse others of that which you are/do.
Liberalism Rule #2 - the rules apply to thee and not me
Liberalism Rule #3 - We know what is best, thus the ends justify the means.
Liberalism Rule #4 - We believe ourselves to be smarter thus, we cannot admit that we are wrong.
i) Admitting mistakes undermines the premise of being smarter, ergo self correction is not possible.
Liberalism Rule #5 - What didn’t work last time, will work next time (see 4 i.)
Liberalism Rule #6 - When we lose, change the rules.
i) Whenever convenient, change the definition to suit our goal.
Liberalism Rule #7 - Appeasement (using other people's money - usually taxpayers) is the best deterrent to conflict.
Liberalism Rule #8 - Totally Differentism - when we do something that we don’t like others doing, it is always “totally different”.
Liberalism Rule #9 - Equity through inequity (any difference must be equalized by pulling down the
unaffected party. Vengeance is preferable).
Liberalism Rule #10 - We support our representative speaking regardless of the truth (in contrast to
conservatives who support the truth regardless of the representative speaking it).
Liberalism Rule #11 - We vote on personality over policy.
Liberalism Rule #12 - Genetics are selective. We believe that sexuality and guilt are genetic, but gender is not. Scientific proof is not required.
Liberalism Rule #13 - Do SOMETHING! When a crisis happens, do SOMETHING! It doesn't have to have to work, but it must: a) make us feel better which is more important than actually solving the crisis, and b) advance the liberal agenda.
Liberalism Rule #14 - "You’ll have to show us a lot more than rock solid, irrefutable evidence”.
Liberalism Rule #15 - There are no universal truths. The truth changes to fit our needs.
Liberalism Rule #16 - The Expert Threshold. If a false narrative has enough “experts” backing it, it becomes truth regardless of evidence to the contrary. “Experts” are defined as those who support the narrative, and they can be conjured if necessary (because of Liberalism Rule #3).
Liberalism Rule #17 - Charity ends at home. It is accomplished through the government with other people’s money.
Liberalism Rule #18 - When failure or bad behavior is completely undeniable, distance yourself from complicity to salve your guilty conscience.
Liberalism Rule #19 - Guns don’t kill people, liberals with guns kill people. Violence comes from the Left.
Liberalism Rule #20 - Only guilty life is precious. Innocence makes us uncomfortable and thus must be eliminated.
Liberalism Rule #21 - "I'm a moderate". We are not liberal, we are "moderates" politically - despite supporting every liberal tenant. This is because we consider ourselves to be the fairest and also because we care too deeply about what others think of us to just admit what we really are (See Rule #22).
Liberalism Rule #22 - “We care too deeply about what others think of us.” (This is why we feel the constant need to virtue signal and try to buy foreign approval with handouts).
Liberalism Rule #23 - Make it about race! "Whenever we are losing an argument, make it about race".
New Rule #24 - “Both sides do it.” Guilt from our bad behavior is best tolerated when diluted to all, and no one can point a finger.
so now it’s Obama’s Deep State that made him do it.
You people are fucking nuts.
(no message)