For those too cheap to buy a WSJ subscription
From today:
When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
In May, Bondi and her deputy informed the president at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files, the officials said. Many other high-profile figures were also named, Trump was told. Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing.
The officials said it was a routine briefing that covered a number of topics and that Trump’s appearance in the documents wasn’t the focus.
They told the president at the meeting that the files contained what officials felt was unverified hearsay about many people, including Trump, who had socialized with Epstein in the past, some of the officials said. One of the officials familiar with the documents said they contain hundreds of other names.
Replies to: For those too cheap to buy a WSJ subscription
What would you expect to come from SDNY? I think this was the delay -they’re doing another frame up
The evidence won’t stick ultimately, but the news cycle mess is the goal….and the distraction. When to.d to,fork over the info, some Dems at SDNY stuck Trump bombs into it.
….and please don’t try to tell me that the SDNY had harmful info on Trump w Epstein that they sat on through two election but didn’t leak or release because of professionalism and honor.
Is it in any way surprising Trump was on the list?
(no message)
He screwed kids. You’re cool with that, we get it.
(no message)
That doesn’t seem on brand for him. But a lot of stuff went on I’m sure.
(no message)
That is flat out libel. And you think SDNY didn’t release this during past 2 elections?
(no message)
You know he did. He raped the shit out of them.
And you know it.
But you have to suppress it.
Must….protect….the leader.
They all cried after he raped them, Baron. Louder than the zygotes, even.
You literally sound like a 14 year old child. Are you a 14 year old child?
(no message)
He is the left.
Read down the board, they are easy to spot.
Even conorlarkin would tell that you have no facts in evidence.
You are playing to type here: An unhinged lib prof.
It is an irresponsible statement from someone who should know better.
(no message)
Tell us right now what proof you have since you are in the know. Give us details.
(no message)
Wishful thinking by the libs. Maniacal fantasy.
(no message)
i heard he did golden showers with 9th graders. the walls are closing in.
(no message)
😎
(no message)
If there had been something there last year, Dems would have used it.
That seems like something we should all be able to agree on.
Yep. Critical thinking is not their strong suit.
(no message)
Garland knew the files were damaging but is his feckless nature, DJT was secure
in knowing the DOJ would do nothing. Not too difficult to figure out as the entire nation knew the exact same.
What a fake persona of Garland you’ve created. The guy who went after rosary prayers & lied about it
(no message)
This can’t be true!
(no message)
I gather Representative James Comer will schedule hearings?
(no message)