The 2017 Russian Interference ICA was a Tissue of Lies
What wasn't an outright lie was weak sauce, with a capital WEAK. It was written by five CIA guys hand-picked by Brennan. And even they revolted over some of the garbage he made them include. The notion that this was an "intelligence community" exercise is complete bullshit. The ONLY reason it was kept classified for so long was because it is so embarrassingly bereft of substance.
The whole point of this exercise-in-fiction-writing was to wreck a US President. People (Brennan and Comey) should go to jail for this, but I'm sure these swamp denizens will find a way to weasel out of accountability. A truly shameful episode in American history.
Link: https://www.racket.news/p/america-this-week-jul-25-2025-the?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Replies to: The 2017 Russian Interference ICA was a Tissue of Lies
Was the Russian hack of the DNC a lie? Was Stone telling them when to release it a lie?
Was Manifort sharing GOP internal research with the GRU “tissue paper”?
I know, I know. You are told nothing happened. And nothing will change that.
Nobody can confirm who hacked the DNC, because they refused to let the FBI look at the servers.
(no message)
Exactly. And why on Earth would they have refused that help?
(no message)
The Mueller Report did 'Name Names' of Russian Hackers...(See attached)
(no message)
Link: https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl?inline=
Named names!
That seals it, I guess?
Read the Mueller report...it has a special section on Hacking by Russians...you know how to do that?
(no message)
“Nobody can confirm who hacked the DNC.” Awesome!
Our intel services know.
Marco Rubio agreed, once upon a time.
Weird that they refused to bring in the FBI? What were they hiding? The "Russians" already had it.
You knew the whole Russia farce was bullshit but didn't care, because it hurt the other side. Shameful.
Remember how Trump was super pissed off at the FBI?
Why do you think that was, deep thinker?
The whole IC was united on this. As was the SSCI.
Five CIA guys wrote the whole thing. 5. There was no community
One of the three citations was a "fragment of an email with no known sender, receiver, or date", which was interpreted five different ways by five guys.
Conflicting intelligence from a source who actually spoke with Putin was ignored.
I guess that passes some sort of social science standard?
You’re going to have to show him lot more than rock solid evidence and reasoning to change his mind
(no message)
It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on not understanding.
Upton Sinclair
Have you read the Mueller Report’s section on Russian Hacking yet?…if not,
What’s keeping you?
The document is a bunch of declarative statements, Ty.
"GRU unit XYZ123 accessed the network via a spearfished employee of the DCCC..." Blah blah blah.
Does that impress you for some reason? Does that sound like proof of something to you?
My bad…mistook you for a functioning adult.
(no message)
What you call hacking normals call honey pot stupidity.
That idiot happened to be
I think we should start a class-action lawsuit for all of the time wasted on a complete fabrication.
I can mine the boards data for terms like "collusion" (which is a specific crime according to idiots) and "treason" to establish how many hours were wasted here.