For Baron and other Trump cultists ….
Replies to: For Baron and other Trump cultists ….
Weak, weak, weak
Of course if Gabbard is correct they're going to write a rebuttal like that. If particular note was not one denial of Obama ordering a different intelligence assessment.
Yep.
(no message)
Another Nobel-worthy post.
(no message)
The cult will not even listen. You’d have better luck teaching a goat to use an ATM.
(no message)
Ever consider that you were the goat unable to be taught?
(no message)
Like you, he doesn't want to teach. He doesn't even want to explain his links. Obscurity is the goal
(no message)
No, the goal is unearned moral superiority.
This is the Communal Narcissist.
Exactly
(no message)
You know that no one clicks on your NYT Op-Ed links, right?
This is the Communal Narcissism problem you've developed.
Well, you can click on the attached Senate Intelligence Committee Report...all 900+ pages that
go into detail of how Trump's campaign manager, Paul Manafort, handed internal polling data to Russian Operative, Konstantin Kilimik, By any other name...that's outright Collusion between Trump and Putin.
Again...our worst enemy went to great lengths to get Trump elected...talk about a "Red Flag"...
Link: https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/7039362-Senate-Intelligence-Committee-Russia/
You're proving my point, no one clicks on your links either.
(no message)
Why avoid reading rock solid proof from a unanimous Senate Report that shows Trump’s
campaign worked with Putin’s intelligence agencies to help DJT win the 2016 election?…doesn’t it alarm you that Trump seeks aid from our worst enemy?
"rock solid proof", ha!
(no message)
Yeah...you kinda have to read the Report to appreciate it...it's called "Critical Thinking", or
being "Fully Informed" before making a decision. One can only hope that you'll take that path someday.
Your definition of "critical thinking" matches my definition of...
"cultish devotion to lies that are demonstrably false narratives". That's an insurmountable impasse.
Bwahahahaha, sharp as a tack.
(no message)
The record on the Russia Collusion hoax is being revealed now - FBI uncovers classified "burn bags"-
Your Op Ed from the Fake News paper means nothing. Evidence from the FBI means a lot more.
Link: https://www.newsmax.com/politics/fbi-director-patel/2025/07/30/id/1220694/
In fairness, I don't click on your newsmax links either.
(no message)
Search on your preferred link. It's widely reported in real media.
(no message)
Link: https://nypost.com/2025/07/30/us-news/fbi-chief-kash-patel-finds-burn-bags-of-trump-russia-documents-in-secret-room/
That's a better link, there's some irony in that the public has been lied to so much that...
No one gives a crap.
Also, point of order, my dear Tulsi should be calling it a "Seditious Conspiracy" rather than a "Treasonous Conspiracy". But most people don't know the difference, so whatever I guess.
A proper statement would read something like: The Obama Administration engaged in a Seditious Conspiracy in an attempt to sabotage and remove a duly elected President by manufacturing evidence (and concealing contrary evidence) of a Treasonous Conspiracy of Russian Collusion to "steal the election" which didn't happen and didn't exist.
The history books will lampoon: "Russia hacked the election and Trump colluded with them to do it!" - Frank/Chris/Jim521