Bad job numbers; Trump fires head of Bureau of Labor Stats
Go ahead and whatabout this one, a-holes.
It’s 1984 shit. The government defines truth.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/01/business/trump-job-report-number-fire?cid=ios_app
Replies to: Bad job numbers; Trump fires head of Bureau of Labor Stats
Same head reported incorrect positive #'s preelection in Spring &Fall '24 for Harris- later revised
downward markedly....she was off by 818,000 jobs that were overestimated in March '24 to the advantage of the incumbent Biden in lead up to election, and later had to be revised. She was then off by 112,000 jobs in Aug/Sept '24 that were overestimated to the advantage of the incumbent Democrat Party which again was revised...after the election.
In July, her revisions were markedly downward - throwing a damper on the market for R Trump in concert with the Fed Chair inexplicably not cutting interest rates...the first time in history that the Feds decision was not unanimous with the Open Market Committee - actually 2 dissenters.
Amazingly, all of her revisions work against Trump. But regardless of whether intentional or not, she is clearly not giving accurate estimates.
Your grip is ending.....or.....we are getting more competent officials such that false information is not being acted upon only to be later revised.
“More competent officials” and Trump appointees is not analogous
(no message)
She must not have fudged the numbers enough
(no message)
I'm surprised that Trump didn't call her and say...."I just need you to find me 11,780 more jobs"...
...or pull out his 'Sharpie' and fix the report himself.
It's no wonder Trump went bankrupt 7 times...and his former accounting firm, Mazars, put out a notice that they could no longer vouch for his business financial statements.
I'm disappointed he hasn't fired more.
(no message)
She begged for that firing.
(no message)
Please elaborate
(no message)
Reference to the Democrat official who said the victims in Cinci begged for their beating.
(no message)
So, nothing to do with this firing. Got it
(no message)
Another hilarious joke?
(no message)
You voice no issue when the Cincinnati mayor says it about a mob racial beating, but here you object
(no message)
Too funny for you?
(no message)
Nice
(no message)
Why don't you invite Ms. Mcentarfer over tonight and console her conjugally.
(no message)
Hasn't she had a bad enough day already?
(no message)
She initially reported it as bad, but has now revised it to terrible.
(no message)
Very true
(no message)
Hahahahahaha! Excellent.
(no message)
Fair point. All that disappointment in one day would crush her.
(no message)
Trump Tariffs are the largest tax increase ever. US consumers will pay these hidden sales taxes.
(no message)
agree. they are really bad.
(no message)
Winning!
(no message)
New Bureau of Labor "Alternative Stats" will be as reliable as Trump Rally crowd sizes.
(no message)
well, nobody had to pull up and blow their car horn to make people think there was actually somebody
there.
you know, like your boy, barack o'biden.
Way to go, dumbest poster of 2025
(no message)
Nah, the Questy meter is pretty high
(no message)
“Don’t sell yourself short, Judge.”
(no message)
Re: New Bureau of Labor "Alternative Stats" will be as reliable as Trump Rally crowd sizes.
(no message)
Link: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ezh3cC-obbY&pp=ygUOYmlkZW4gYnVtYmxlcyA%3D
Maybe he should have just lied about the numbers. You know, like the past 4 years.
(no message)
Evidence or just your usual bullshit?
(no message)
Definitely appears to be a case of shooting the messenger
(no message)