Wharton's Jeremy Siegel rips apart BLS data collection.
Replies to: Wharton's Jeremy Siegel rips apart BLS data collection.
I beat him to it
(no message)
And he also calls "Foul" on DJT's claim the "Numbers were Rigged Against Me", while expressing
caution about the effects of Trump Tariffs on GDP. One more point...his finger-crossing on AI coming to the rescue, portends more stress on the Labor Market.
Hilarious to think this is why Trump fired her
She was fired because Trump didn’t like the message, not disagreements about the minutiae of data collection.
This is a post-hoc rationalization. And a poor one at that.
Also, he does not really rip the BLS’s system. But whatever.
You still have not explained the 800,000 job readjustment.
(no message)
Watch the video - tardy questionnaire returns, insistence on using USPS
(no message)
Sounds like incompetence at best.
(no message)
Their methods need updating. But nothing is "rigged", despite what President Four-Year-Old says
(no message)
If nothing can be rigged then what is the problem?
(no message)
(no message)
When he changes the system and makes up numbers, it will change. Credibility will be destroyed.
Is this hard to grasp?
It’s hard to grasp how Trump will rig the stats when you say they can’t be rigged.
(no message)
If he changes the system, it can be rigged. Is that too complicated for you?
(no message)
He’s changing the director and implementing the changes that caused the data inaccuracy. That’s all.
(no message)
Explain in detail how he is going to “change the system”.
Sounds like you a just advancing a hypothetical
prophecy. You’ve never been very good at that.
Explain in detail what has not happened? Can you be more tiresome?
(no message)
Tiresome is flinging crap against a wall and hoping it sticks.
You offer zero evidence of how Trump will rig the stats because you apparently don’t know.
I am diligent, not tiresome.
Nope. You’re tiresome and quite weird.
(no message)
Maybe he has a close personal friendship with whats-her-name who was fired.
(no message)
Everyone has an agenda... even data manipulators.
(no message)