Newly declassified evidence show Obama led manufacturing of false intel assessment against Trump
Sent to DOJ.
Obama is protected from prosecution, but 94's "professionals" whose own emails reveal that they were part of a coup against the elected POTUS are in for a long and well deserved investigation and probably trial.
Clapper, Brennan, Comey, et al
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clapper-pushed-compromise-normal-steps-rush-2017-ica-despite-concerns-from-nsa-director
Replies to: Newly declassified evidence show Obama led manufacturing of false intel assessment against Trump
The guy tried to install a functional moron as POTUS twice. He’s evil.
(no message)
I think a few more posts about this and everyone will forget about Epstein
Because that’s what this is all about.
Just nonsense red meat for imbeciles.
The Epstein situation may be more of a problem for the libs. Let it play out.
(no message)
There you go again, bringing up someone you don’t care about. Kinda strange…
(no message)
He's just tired of the whatabouts.
(no message)
He is the Prince of Whataboutism.
(no message)
Liberalism Rule #1.
(no message)
He's tired of whatabouts from cow country, which really shouldn't exist at all.
(no message)
yet, your party had no issue going after a former president trump for less.
(no message)
Jeez, after I lauded you for your best post in years, we get this?
(no message)
NSA was not on board with Brennan's bullshit assessment.
Clapper told them it was time to be team players and to accept that they just couldn't go through normal protocols.
This was a very dark episode in our nations history. Shameful and treasonous.
Link: https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1955721194143146226?t=pDwrp2d7QiM5Eu9JaMXmrw&s=19
And Clapper specifically denied this info existed to Senate Intel Cmte - whose head said they'd have
gone after the corrupt Obama intel community had they known...rather than just saying that there was no evidence of Trump/Russian collusion as they did.
Another X post. All this bullshit will get sorted out and ya'll will look like the thirsty fools we
know you are.
Emails you stupid moron.
(no message)
$1000 charity bet this goes nowhere?
(no message)
It'll probably go nowhere. But we all know the truth.
The whole "scandal" was manufactured by Democrats right up to the heads of the CIA and our National Intelligence Director. The basis was bullshit paid for by a democratic candidate, HRC.
A shameful, treasonous episode driven by a desire to wreck a presidency.
Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi, that moron chinese-spy-fucker from California Swalwell. All of them knew about it the whole time.
Well said.
(no message)
That all rings true, which should be enough for a FISA warrant.
(no message)
Do you have a liquid $1000?
(no message)
?
(no message)
Do you have a liquid $1000?
(no message)
Of course, I wagered the bet. You want in?
(no message)
Quest4twelveIQPoints is right now wondering why he would melt down gold coins.
(no message)
Is there some training regimen in rat country that teaches "act stupid by default"?
(no message)
There's no hiding the fact that in 2020, the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee found hundreds of
collaborations between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia...not the least of which was Campaign Chairman, Paul Manafort, handling internal polling data to Russian Agent, Konstantin Kilimnik....Clapper, Comey, et al were spot on sounding the alarm that Donald Trump was getting help from our enemy, Vladimir Putin to win the Presidential election.
Read all 996 pages...Trump is guilty as sin.
Link: https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/7039362-Senate-Intelligence-Committee-Russia/
We already covered this. The Senate did not have this information at that time
Try to keep up. I know you like to keep using old info that is no longer relevant as new info emerges, but still.
He has no credibility.
(no message)
Baron's sources allege that the Obama admin was spreading 'False' information about Trump/Russia...
...since the Senate Intelligence Committee Report found undeniable EVIDENCE that back in 2016 Trump was colluding with Putin to win the election...A LOT...literally hundreds of documented collaborations...So, if anyone actually was leaking information about any of those actions, they were SPOT ON...and the information was NOT false...that's logical.
Trump is guilty and needs to go on trial for collaborating with our enemy.
What was the committee's summary conclusion?
(no message)
What were the Unanimous Findings?...you know...Manafort/Kilimnik...DT Jr./Veselnitskaya..etc., etc..
...exchanges of Christmas Card lists?...but for a one GOP Senator majority, the Findings would have led to a non-political announcement of Collusion, Collaboration, Coordination, or whatever term that suits you.
No answer for their conclusion. That's okay, because it's in big letters.
(no message)
No answer to the evidence unanimously accepted showing clear collusion between the Trump
Campaign and Russian agents.
MAGAs have no clue when it comes to subtlety and. nuance…the GOP Senators were not required to make a criminal judgment…just present the facts…so that’s what the 9 of them did (or create a firestorm in their party). The 8 Democrat Senators were not so encumbered, so they presented the factual evidence…and the logical conclusion…I.e. Collusion between Trump and Putin.
You're trying to hang your hat on Manafort, and it's an epic fail.
(no message)
Really!?…and why why would that be?
(no message)
Been brought to your attention and clarified repeatedly here.
Now go see if you can get to the bottom of what happened to Biden in the debate.
Still no answer to the 996 pages of documentation detailing all the "Collaborations...Coordinating..
Colluding" going on between Trump's and Putin's aides? Every single GOP Senator signed his name to those Findings...which together spell "Collusion" between the two parties...at least to anyone with enough intelligence to pass an SAT reading comprehension test. You did go to college, didn't you?
Every involved Senator signed a report that concluded "no collusion" as its summary.
(no message)
Based on the volume of evidence presented, what are the odds a jury would agree?…would you?
(no message)
Apparently pretty high, since there was no indictment. Oops!
(no message)
Apologies and if it gets me banned so be it! You're a complete effing moron!
I'd rather take the punishment versus endure anymore mental midget behavior.
Don't blame the messenger.
(no message)
Baron, you're not a messenger. Get this through yoir thick skull.
(no message)
I'm posting a news story.You OTOH,are a Purdue guy on an ND website challenging board ops to ban you
Not the best decision. I will keep posting as I always have.
Keep showing us for the fool that you are. Shame you don't have
(no message)
DNI announcing new declassified emails further identifying Obama in coup attempt is newsworthy....
...lets' talk about what you are REALLY upset about here.
Pins and needles. Your shame amnesia won't allow you to remember this but we have receipts.
(no message)
You'll deny it the whole way, even if convictions cuz your low intelligence& uneducated inexperience
make you the ideal candidate for indoctrination into the Cult of the Left.
Like I said pins and needles waiting for for the 'convictions'
(no message)
You have the good fortune of having such a weak mind that you won't remember this by then anyways...
Boiler Up!