Classified docs investigation. Compare/contrast the legal merits of:
Trump, Biden, Pence and now John Bolton
Does one seem more credible than the other based on what's publicly known?
Replies to: Classified docs investigation. Compare/contrast the legal merits of:
I know this is new to you, but only Trump had The Presidential Records Act, the others did not.
Biden was VP (not President) when he stole those records.
Of Biden, Bolton, and Trump, only Trump did not steal records. He did it legally.
What exactly does that mean Baron? Trump can walk out as a citizen holding on to any classified
record he likes until he doesn't want to have it anymore?
Why do you worship an obvious liar and traitor?
(no message)
I don't think anyone worships the man, we like his policies.
(no message)
You like Don's policy of submission to Putin? Or his policy of using military vs US citizens?
(no message)
How is he using military against US citizens?
(no message)
I like his actual policies for most part. Your fantasy claims about his policies can be ignored.
(no message)
Ha! Good one…Baron said hold his beer!!
(no message)
I have no need of a beer holder with your flat top hair cut :)
(no message)
Partisanship + cluelessness = Trump is always innocent
That act does not allow former presidents to keep classified documents.
But why do I bother.
No, that was to be litigated until it was ruled Dems had illegally appointed Jack Smith & dropped it
Trump had an argument that would have been litigated in court. You might disagree, but it was a reasonable case to bring, and the rule of law would have been followed based on that decision. The Dems dropped the case because they knew they would likely lose. (Dems had broken many longstanding precedents int heir efforts to hunt Trump including raiding his home in Mara Lago in an upcoming election year while Trump's lawyers were in discussions with the National Archives about the issue. When they dropped the case against Trump, they comically claimed that they didn't want to violate the longstanding precedent of prosecuting a sitting president. Of course, precedent never stopped them before with Trump).
D's could have easily restarted the case against Trump legally, but the did not (it was losing ground for them politically so they cut bait).
The Dems illegally appointed Smith as special council without approval of the senate because the Dem WH administration were hunting Trump in a coordinated effort between the DOJ and the White House...ie weaponized govt lawfare.
Why do I even bother? I know that you can't remember all of this, and I know that you don't read enough on the topic from viewpoints other than from your echochamber.
Please link a copy of the judicial ruling you referenced.
(no message)
Google is even your friend.
(no message)
One did not cooperate and obstructed justice
The rest did not.
So Biden's "cooperating" was withholding more records four different times?! Wrong again.
(no message)
If you steal something but years later "cooperate" no crime is committed.
According to the board lefties.
One of them wrote a letter lying that there were no more documents in their possession…one of them
Has video tapes proving there were and showing them being moved by staff to other parts of their residence…one of them falsely claimed Top Secret Documents in their possession belonged to them and not the U.S. government…
Donald Trump should be in Prison right now…were it not for “Lawfare” by judge Aileen Cannon.
.
Define steal in all of these cases if you don't mind?
(no message)
Nice.
(no message)
Hillary cooperated with Bleach Bit and a hammer - if only Chris had concerns when it was his own.
(no message)
Hillary? How did she enter this conversation side show Baron?
(no message)
This has passed you by. Look forward to seeing you soon.
(no message)
Joe Biden
(no message)
Could you provide some facts, possibly in chart form? Otherwise just seems like whining again.
(no message)