The number of people getting fired today for gloating over Kirk's assassination is staggering.
Lots of teachers and health care professionals have been walked out the door. Even someone from the Carolina Panthers. As MAS pointed out, too many examples to list here. And now Rubio said he will deny entry to any foreigner who celebrated yesterday.
The way it should be. The lives of radical Leftist liberals need to be altered for this putrid behavior to stop.
Link: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1966189852199891181
Replies to: The number of people getting fired today for gloating over Kirk's assassination is staggering.
Cancel Culture alive and well in MAGAworld.
(no message)
Celebrating someone's death and espousing a different point of view are two separate things
Logic and reason are not strong suits of the left.
It’s difficult to blame folks for disliking someone who unabashedly promotes hatred and falsehoods.
But when we say that about guys like Kirk, you all love to shout Woke.
If you don’t like my opinion maybe you should look at yourself and take a look at your rhetoric.
Not really. Not when they are a teacher who has access to young people.
(no message)
I see, there are conditions for who gets immunity from cancel culture. If it’s a R you can’t
disagree with him but if it’s a D then of course they should be fired from their jobs.
Brilliant
This isn't cancel culture, it's getting fired/suspende for conduct inconsistent with expressed norms
(no message)
An iceberg in all languages is still an iceberg.
(no message)
Typical for the left: mistaking (conflating) a difference in kind w/a difference in severity.
(no message)
Same comments as Biden years, but due to fear of Trump orgs are cracking down
And the lefty loonies will tell me that’s wrong, but it’s not. Look no further than Facebook and how Zuckerberg ratted out Biden the second Trump got elected.
The dummies in these lefties orgs think they can just keep doing what they were. Nope.
.
And the lefty loonies will tell me that’s wrong, but it’s not. Look no further than Facebook and how Zuckerberg ratted out Biden the second Trump got elected.
The dummies in these lefties orgs think they can just keep doing what they were. Nope.
.
And the lefty loonies will tell me that’s wrong, but it’s not. Look no further than Facebook and how Zuckerberg ratted out Biden the second Trump got elected.
The dummies in these lefties orgs think they can just keep doing what they were. Nope.
.
And the lefty loonies will tell me that’s wrong, but it’s not. Look no further than Facebook and how Zuckerberg ratted out Biden the second Trump got elected.
The dummies in these lefties orgs think they can just keep doing what they were. Nope.
.
And the lefty loonies will tell me that’s wrong, but it’s not. Look no further than Facebook and how Zuckerberg ratted out Biden the second Trump got elected.
The dummies in these lefties orgs think they can just keep doing what they were. Nope.
If they want to lose 50% of their own business, that's their prerogative
But when they work for someone else, that someone would be smart to fire a lunatic who is actively damaging their business.
This is a country of 340 million people
Of course you are going to have fringe randos trying to get clicks.
And of course you are going to have people like you and MAS assert that these fringe randos represent "the left."
Cole is the exaggeration queen. What happened to this guy is deplorable.
It should never happen to anyone excersing free speech rights. Having said that he was a demagogue that I don’t mourn at all.
Pssst... your rage issue is showing.
(no message)
Nah but your insecurities are. Look inward scout.
(no message)
Yes. Indeed.
As Senator Kelly (Gabby Gifford's husband) said yesterday, "I would go to war to defend Charlie's freedom of speech," but his pontification and beliefs were divisive (and I am being kind.)
The guy engaged in respectful, logic-based debate.
Demagogues appeal to prejudices, which he did not do. If you watch his debates, he let his opponents explain their positions before using cold logic to respond. I know you don't think all people who (1) disagree with you and (2) communicate well, are demagogues, so why Kirk?
Many would disagree with you. Just peruse the interwebs.
One man’s “activist” is another’s “demagogue”.
I've watched some of his campus debates. All logic. No demagoguery.
(no message)
Correct and respectful to the people asking questions or attempting to debate him even though often
They would insult and curse at him.
You are so objective, sure I will.
(no message)
As are you, I guess? We can't even discuss his debate style without it being personal?
I'm not saying he was perfect...always right...never deviated. I'm just saying I've watched a lot of his debates, and they were always respectful and logic based. I get that you disagree with him, but that is besides the point.
Yeah we disagree. And it isn’t just style. That isn’t the only thing that makes one a demagogue.
Add in appeal to prejudices, exaggeration, and misinformation.
I doubt Kirk was killed for exaggerating too much.
(no message)
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn’t change the fact that he routinely engaged in it.
(no message)
He constantly worked for peaceful discourse, and argued against violence. Typical demagogue.
(no message)
"Demagogues appeal to prejudices, which he did not do." Let's not start that nonsense.
(no message)
Please name the prejudices that you perceive that he had.
Not just leftist talking points, also explain why they are prejudices just because he disagrees with them.
I will start, he said that all trans people are mental defectives, this is medical fact but leftists consider it prejudice.
Thr truth is always a good place to start.
I'm not saying he was right 100% of the time. We don't need to go there for this discussion. We are talking about his debate style.
Surely it is not your position that a firmly held, unapologetic, conservative belief is necessarily demagoguery. There are logical/scientific arguments against liberal positions. If you cannot allow for that possibility, then you may want to re-examine which side employs demagoguery.
(no message)
“Fringe randos” in our public schools, on fire departments, in the military, etc.
Thankfully, they stupidly identify themselves by posting their hatred, and we can get rid of them.
Should we make a list of people who celebrated the attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband?
Those were not randos. That list included the President of the United States.
So, your argument is: people on the right did it, so people on the left should be able to? Got it.
(no message)
Sounds more like you.
(no message)
Sure, Cole, Jakers, and MAS here had the balls to try to blame
the elderly victim. Effin hypocrites.
Yup. They recklessly suggested the assailant was Mr. Pelosi's lover.
When the victim is a Democrat, they immediately minimize and try to blame the victim as being complicit.
But, when the victim is a MAGA supporter or disciple, they immediately blame anyone who has liberal political beliefs as being complicit.
And in any homicide involving an assailant who is a person of color or an unlawful immigrant or a homosexual or transsexual, then of course, they blame all persons of color or all unlawful immigrants or all persons who have different sexuality than them.
They feed hate. They feed violence.
All true and that includes POTUS. Yet here they play the victim.
That Paul Pelosi thing was just disgraceful. I have heard no one celebrate Kirk’s death like they celebrated the beating of an 80 year old plus man,
The president's remarks yesterday started off fine...then ventured off into us-vs-them land
Flags were flown at half-staff for Kirk, but he bitched like a madman when people wanted them at half-staff when Carter died.
It's 24/7 division with this guy. No one else has been remotely like him.