“Show me the man I’ll show you his crime” the rule of law is not so slowly being extinguished in US.
(no message)
Replies to: “Show me the man I’ll show you his crime” the rule of law is not so slowly being extinguished in US.
Then save money by turning off the lights in the Statue of Liberty torch
(no message)
Irony!
(no message)
Well, two wrongs always make a right, so you guys sure do have a point.
(no message)
I now disavow those things my peeps did for years without a peep from me.
(no message)
I now approve of everything Trump does because I can come up with fatuous comparisons
(no message)
You're really upset at the guy throwing the second punch after tacitly supporting the first.
Obviously Trump could be the bigger person, let bygones be bygones, but that isn't his nature.
Does it really bother me that he is targeting those who targeted him, no. If it extends beyond that into targeting presidential candidates for 2028, as was done to him, that would be a bigger problem, but not unprecedented.
Just as long as you guys never have to respond to anything DJT does, I’m happy!
(no message)
I didn't vote for him and I didn't support the stupidity of the Dems that led to his return.
BTW, it appears that Manchin is going to run as an Independent.
I really wish Manchin was younger...
(no message)
He did not seem particularly sharp on Maher's show on Friday.
(no message)
He'll turn 81 in August 2028. We have to stop this madness...
Never should have been considered with Biden to begin with.
I don't think age should be the deciding factor, but a heavily weighted indicator.
Just as an example off the top of my head:
Warren Buffet is 95, Munger was 99 at the age of his death. Both would have outperformed Biden in their 90s, IMO.
Thomas Sowell would also "run circles around" Biden at 95.
But, I'm also good with setting an age restriction. Transparent cognitive tests would be better, codified into an automatic 25A, perhaps.
Entirely deciding no...but putting in anyone over 80 is so incredibly risky as to be nearly prima
...facie daft.
(Plus now we see that the 25th Amendment has the VP as the lynchpin decider to act. In today's politics it is all party, there are virtually no patriots, as Kamala ably demonstrated by acting SOLELY in her own political interest.)
.
(no message)
Correct, 25A relied on a completely different political climate.
Broken by the same two parties that have broken everything else.
25th needs to be re-cast to have someone other than VP and cabinet as evaluators and trigger...
No one seems to care very much...but it did not work as it was intended at all...
Yep, agreed.
(no message)
No one cared about the tat...just the tit...
(no message)
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. Innocent people have nothing to worry about.
How many names were you and I called for speaking out against this?
Myopic!
And of course you and Markharman are not at all bright.
I'd say the word hypocrisy is more apt
(no message)
The Dem Left has no self awareness. It's pretty hilarious actually.
(no message)
Do you realize you’re supporting a Felon, Rapist, Fraud who was in contact with a “War Room” full of
Stolen Election Conspiracy Theorists on Jan. 5th for the express goal of overturning a free and fair election?
Talk about a lack of awareness…and that’s not funny.
Like I said, the Dem left are all pretty hilarious. Deserve to be ridiculed.
(no message)
Given that you can’t refute a single thing I posted the ridicule is squarely pointed at you.
(no message)