We suffer these galore!
But is it the “issues” or we just have identity groups who are “uncomfortable” with one another?
Initiating violence to stop dialogue is not the way to stop violence. When a murderer genuinely believes that another person is evil because they want to talk through the issues openly and freely, and when that murderer genuinely believes that they themselves are not evil when they murder to stop dialogue, we have a long way to go to improve things.
Please do not make the jump (like Baron) that anyone but the shooter thought murder was the fix.
Now tell us why you voted for a candidate who solicited and absolved violence as an appropriate course of action to overthrow the 2020 election.
Dem Party.
Your sickening rhetoric in the name of desperately grasping for votes caused this.
(no message)
"They're gonna put you back in chains!" "Only Nazis disagree with the existence of systemic racism!"
You people. Own it.
(no message)
(no message)
Imagine if Kirk was a young Democrat. There would be rioting in the streets of dozens of cities. That's because violence primarily comes from the Left.
I didn't vote "for" anyone for president in the last election. I did vote against the candidate I thought would do the most harm to the nation during their 4 year term.
(no message)
Kirk is another murder victim to gun violence. Not a martyr.
Would love to hear Quest and 521 answer this question as well. I suspect they would have a hard time making a choice.
Even if you have a hard time making the choice, you are smart enough to know who the average juror would condemn more, so you are smart enough to pick correctly in this public forum. Nonetheless, I'll give you a chance to go against your natural inclination, and pick the right answer.