Newsom called ICE " Trump’s private domestic army" on Colbert
"The ICE issue is alarming beyond words.People ask, ‘Well, is authoritarianism you being hyperbolic?’ Bulls–t we’re being hyperbolic. If you’re a black or brown community, it’s here in this country… These are not just authoritarian tendencies; these are authoritarian actions by an authoritarian government,”
" That’s happening in the United States of America: Masked men jumping out of unmarked cars, people disappearing, no due process, no oversight, zero accountability. This can’t be normalized. None of this can be normalized.”
The next day, a brainwashed liberal terrorist opened fire with a rifle on an ICE facility in Dallas. Ironically, this terrorist killed a migrant. Does Newsom bear any responsibility for this? Is this ridiculously over-the-top rhetoric advisable from probable candidates for President?
Replies to: Newsom called ICE " Trump’s private domestic army" on Colbert
Brennan's in a full panic, too.
(no message)
Why?
(no message)
Probably from seeing other corrupt hoax perpetrators indicted.
(no message)
So you support selective prosecutions with zero evidence?
(no message)
No, that was Brennan. There’s lots of evidence against him also.
(no message)
Is Trump's play that since no one likes Comey, no one will mind if he get screwed?
(no message)
I thought you said grand juries are sealed, and we don't know what evidence was presented?
(no message)
Tell us what new evidence the Trump lackey learned in 5 days after career prosecutor was fired.
(no message)
All I know is that it convinced the grand jury. You are the one who claims to know more than you do.
(no message)
Mic drop….
(no message)
One of the best gifts of these past months has been seeing you folks having to be subjected to what
you dished out. The sniveling and crying was utterly predictable, and I did, in fact, predict it.
You did predict this.
(no message)
So no evidence was presented to the grand jury?
Hilarious.
I didn't before you people made a pastime of it.
(no message)
Tell us more about the “you people” cases.
(no message)
He will never be president.
His reputation and the reputation of his state have been damaged for at least a generation. The idea that independent voters want what he and Cali are selling is silly. The Dems may be foolish enough to nominate a Cali liberal, but the results will be similar to or worse than Kam's results.
I think he'll be the nominee.
It'll be the Newsom/AOC ticket. AOC, after attacking Newsom's White Privilege during the debates (if they even have debates) will be the VP on the ticket. History repeats and such... We tried Hillary and that got us Trump, but a white dude with a non-white female, that's a winning strategy. All about categories and immutable characteristics.
FYI…Only old rubes call California, “cali.”
(no message)
.
(no message)
No. Calling out creeping authoritarianism is a patriotic duty.
And it is neither incitement to, or endorsement of, violence.
Yeah, real man of the people, spend 285 million on a special elect to usurp the will of the people.
(no message)
Sure. In six months you'll be telling us the 2nd amendment is the most important.
(no message)
Yeah, pretty sure I won’t
(no message)
Since when is enforcing immigration law authoritarian?
(no message)