Of course the UN let this guy through to attack Trump official. They sabotaged his visit and speech 3x and now let a radical in past many layers of security.
The Radical Left controls the Dem Party.
and they are in alignment with communist China and the radical muslim jihadists who presently hold sway over the UN.
It is real.
The top Dem in the Party (Newsome) has been vilifying federal ICE agency as “Trump’s army, and has intentionally encouraged doxing of ICE agents with laws that put their lives and families at risk from the violent gangs that they let into the country.
Trump has a very tough set of decisions ahead of him to deal with this. Releasing criminals like this UN attacker cannot be allowed. Examples must be set. No leniency for violence. He will get my support. The liberal jihad must end.
Our advantage is that they are cowards and will flee when confronted and forced to bear harsh consequences.
The radical Left is immersed in evil.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-administration-official-physically-assaulted-unga-deranged-leftist-white-house-says
(no message)
in Buffalo, NY...or Hispanics in El Paso, TX?...were the assailants registered Democrats? The utter blindness to reality by Baron has become expected...why do you not stand up and correct him?
Not everyone in any society is "Well Adjusted"...we should all band together and disavow violence...AND call for peaceful dialogue to resolve differences...not unlike what MLK did.
(no message)
After resisting arrest. Innocent people were killed and innocent businesses looted and destroyed.
And you defend it. You are a piece of shit. I hate your guts.
...this is all about Baron's made up meme that all politically motivated violence comes only from those who aren't Conservative...and I've shown he's 100% wrong (not the first time) with the examples of the Racist Mass Shootings of Black People in Buffalo, NY as well as the Racially motivated Mass Shooting of Hispanics at an El Paso, Texas, Walmart...yet, I'm at a loss for any recollection of a post from you that expresses outrage or even sorrow for the scores of innocent dead people in those tragedies. Did I miss one?
When is this Hypocrisy going to end?
(no message)
George Floyd’s life has zero value to jakers. Floyd deserved to die!
Now white Duke lacrosse players being accused of gang rape of a black female …. OMG! That’s an injustice.
You are a true racist. Truly.
(no message)
(no message)
like many other illnesses and cognitively limiting states.
I am just the mournful observer reporting the facts.
As I have said, I am like Baroness Jane Goodall, and the Open is my Gombe Stream National Park.
(You are one of the apes).
….and yes Jane von Lawick Goodall was a baroness - more irony.
(no message)
is a real problem.
I probably shouldn’t throw the condescension back at them, but when someone keeps claiming to be “teaching” us while demonstrating inane thinking, it’s hard to ignore.
“The roots of condescension stem from feelings of insecurity or a need to appear superior to others. It can also arise from a narcissistic personality or a desire to dominate others.”
Liberalism Rule #4 - We believe ourselves to be smarter thus, we cannot admit that we are wrong.
i) Admitting mistakes undermines the premise of being smarter, ergo self correction is not possible.
his "Rule #4"...which shows him to be the Hypocrite he really is...just read the contents in the attached thread and you'll understand...like Jakers had to acknowledge, even though he didn't want to.
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=120560
The politicians, however, know no limits when it comes to inflammatory rhetoric and LAWFARE.
Fortunately, most folks barely care about any of this kabuki.
SDNY Attorney, Geoffrey Berman's book "Holding the Line", where he chronicles Trump himself using AG Bill Barr to scrub all mention of him ("Individual-1") from the charging documents that sent Michael Cohen to prison...for doing DJT's bidding in the Stormy Daniels payoff scheme. Berman has documented exchanges between his office and 'Main Justice' that expose true "Lawfare" to keep Trump from being held accountable.
The ball is in your 'court', Mr. Equivocator ;-)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
of the issue...since they know where that will end up.
(no message)
when you pull your head out of the sand.
Though right wing violence is not impossible, the statistical number of left wing violent events so outweighs the other side that it is statistically significant.
It’s so obvious, the libs will need to start spreading false statistics soon.
One of the big downsides of the Left’s association with China is that they are fully vulnerable ti China’s desire to divide us even further.
What politicians are flaming the country with violent name calling and physical attacks on law enforcement? Which side tried to assassinate the president twice? Which supporter killed Charlie Kirk? Which political supporter attacked Rs at a softball game? Which side is it exactly that have taken over neighborhoods and created "no go" zones? Which political party and their politicians called on violent rhetoric against Supreme Court judges and the president himself? Which party again is it that attacks conservatives in restaurants? Which party is it that BLM and antifa align with? The modern day Democrat party have more in common with Lee Oswald than they do with John Kennedy.
…-“guilt from own behavior is better tolerated when diluted to all, and also then no one can point a finger at us”.
BaronVonZemo's Rules of Liberalism:
Liberalism Rule #1 - accuse others of that which you are/do.
Liberalism Rule #2 - the rules apply to thee and not me
Liberalism Rule #3 - We know what is best, thus the ends justify the means.
Liberalism Rule #4 - We believe ourselves to be smarter thus, we cannot admit that we are wrong.
i) Admitting mistakes undermines the premise of being smarter, ergo self correction is not possible.
Liberalism Rule #5 - What didn’t work last time, will work next time (see 4 i.)
Liberalism Rule #6 - When we lose, change the rules.
i) Whenever convenient, change the definition to suit our goal.
Liberalism Rule #7 - Appeasement (using other people's money - usually taxpayers) is the best deterrent to conflict.
Liberalism Rule #8 - Totally Differentism - when we do something that we don’t like others doing, it is always “totally different”.
Liberalism Rule #9 - Equity through inequity (any difference must be equalized by pulling down the
unaffected party. Vengeance is preferable).
Liberalism Rule #10 - We support our representative speaking regardless of the truth (in contrast to
conservatives who support the truth regardless of the representative speaking it).
Liberalism Rule #11 - We vote on personality over policy.
Liberalism Rule #12 - Genetics are selective. We believe that sexuality and guilt are genetic, but gender is not. Scientific proof is not required.
Liberalism Rule #13 - Do SOMETHING! When a crisis happens, do SOMETHING! It doesn't have to have to work, but it must: a) make us feel better which is more important than actually solving the crisis, and b) advance the liberal agenda.
Liberalism Rule #14 - "You’ll have to show us a lot more than rock solid, irrefutable evidence”.
Liberalism Rule #15 - There are no universal truths. The truth changes to fit our needs.
Liberalism Rule #16 - The Expert Threshold. If a false narrative has enough “experts” backing it, it becomes truth regardless of evidence to the contrary. “Experts” are defined as those who support the narrative, and they can be conjured if necessary (because of Liberalism Rule #3).
Liberalism Rule #17 - Charity ends at home. It is accomplished through the government with other people’s money.
Liberalism Rule #18 - When failure or bad behavior is completely undeniable, distance yourself from complicity to salve your guilty conscience.
Liberalism Rule #19 - Guns don’t kill people, liberals with guns kill people. Violence comes from the Left.
Liberalism Rule #20 - Only guilty life is precious. Innocence makes us uncomfortable and thus must be eliminated.
Liberalism Rule #21 - "I'm a moderate". We are not liberal, we are "moderates" politically - despite supporting every liberal tenant. This is because we consider ourselves to be the fairest and also because we care too deeply about what others think of us to just admit what we really are (See Rule #22).
Liberalism Rule #22 - “We care too deeply about what others think of us.” (This is why we feel the constant need to virtue signal and try to buy foreign approval with handouts).
Liberalism Rule #23 - Make it about race! "Whenever we are losing an argument, make it about race".
Liberalism Rule #24 - “Both sides do it.” Guilt from our bad behavior is better tolerated when diluted to all, and also then no one can point a finger at us”.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)