UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

He was investigating an insurrection, and was seeking to identify the scope of the conspiracy.

Pulling toll records is basic Federal Investigation 101.

And let’s see who was talking to who pre January 6th.

Bring it!

that the D’s knew that they arranged to begin with.

It will never happen because GOP Senators don't want the public to know why Special Counsel subpoenaed toll records ... which by the way ... do not reveal content -- only when and what phone numbers were called from a particular phone.

The public deserves to know who the GOP Senators were talking to on JAN 3rd, JAN 4th, JAN 5th, JAN 6th, JAN 7th.

Bring it, cowards.

(no message)

into J6th.

And that sounds like an appropriate investigation, following warrants.

It was an insurrection. Not sure if that made it through the bubble.

(no message)

…and nobody is fooled by your attempt to hide behind definitions. It was abuse of power by the Dems (Obama/Biden) just as the lawfare against Trump, and the attempted coup with the Russian Collusion scam.

It is you who are the hypocrite. Stop listing off things for us about Trump when you won’t accept the obvious about Biden.

Since you think 1/6 was a beautiful day of love, any investigation is automatically illegitimate.

Any investigation of your team is always “spying.” That word sounds much scarier!

that you select.

We all see it.

(no message)

Link: https://x.com/dilanianmsnbc/status/1975374749317353671?s=46&t=kVeQeQf8ed0KokuRgfOE0g

“When we do something that we don’t like others doing, it is always “totally different”. In this case, using the FBI under the direction of a White House Adm member to secretly surveille members of congress from the opposition party is not spying when you do it. If Trump did it, then it would be the beginning of the 4th Reich.

I expect you to accuse Trump of your own behavior soon (Rule #1), if you have not already done so.

You have a mental illness (liberalism) with an acute exacerbation (TDS). Get help.

BaronVonZemo's Rules of Liberalism:

Liberalism Rule #1 - accuse others of that which you are/do.
Liberalism Rule #2 - the rules apply to thee and not me
Liberalism Rule #3 - We know what is best, thus the ends justify the means.
Liberalism Rule #4 - We believe ourselves to be smarter thus, we cannot admit that we are wrong.
i) Admitting mistakes undermines the premise of being smarter, ergo self correction is not possible.
Liberalism Rule #5 - What didn’t work last time, will work next time (see 4 i.)
Liberalism Rule #6 - When we lose, change the rules.
i) Whenever convenient, change the definition to suit our goal.
Liberalism Rule #7 - Appeasement (using other people's money - usually taxpayers) is the best deterrent to conflict.
Liberalism Rule #8 - Totally Differentism - when we do something that we don’t like others doing, it is always “totally different”.
Liberalism Rule #9 - Equity through inequity (any difference must be equalized by pulling down the
unaffected party. Vengeance is preferable).
Liberalism Rule #10 - We support our representative speaking regardless of the truth (in contrast to
conservatives who support the truth regardless of the representative speaking it).
Liberalism Rule #11 - We vote on personality over policy.
Liberalism Rule #12 - Genetics are selective. We believe that sexuality and guilt are genetic, but gender is not. Scientific proof is not required.
Liberalism Rule #13 - Do SOMETHING! When a crisis happens, do SOMETHING! It doesn't have to have to work, but it must: a) make us feel better which is more important than actually solving the crisis, and b) advance the liberal agenda.
Liberalism Rule #14 - "You’ll have to show us a lot more than rock solid, irrefutable evidence”.
Liberalism Rule #15 - There are no universal truths. The truth changes to fit our needs.
Liberalism Rule #16 - The Expert Threshold. If a false narrative has enough “experts” backing it, it becomes truth regardless of evidence to the contrary. “Experts” are defined as those who support the narrative, and they can be conjured if necessary (because of Liberalism Rule #3).
Liberalism Rule #17 - Charity ends at home. It is accomplished through the government with other people’s money.
Liberalism Rule #18 - When failure or bad behavior is completely undeniable, distance yourself from complicity to salve your guilty conscience.
Liberalism Rule #19 - Guns don’t kill people, liberals with guns kill people. Violence comes from the Left.
Liberalism Rule #20 - Only guilty life is precious. Innocence makes us uncomfortable and thus must be eliminated.
Liberalism Rule #21 - "I'm a moderate". We are not liberal, we are "moderates" politically - despite supporting every liberal tenant. This is because we consider ourselves to be the fairest and also because we care too deeply about what others think of us to just admit what we really are (See Rule #22).
Liberalism Rule #22 - “We care too deeply about what others think of us.” (This is why we feel the constant need to virtue signal and try to buy foreign approval with handouts).
Liberalism Rule #23 - Make it about race! "Whenever we are losing an argument, make it about race".
Liberalism Rule #24 - “Both sides do it.” Guilt from our bad behavior is better tolerated when diluted to all, and also then no one can point a finger at us”.

Moron.

Link: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/fbi-attorney-admits-altering-email-used-fisa-application-during-crossfire-hurricane

(no message)

(no message)

Boy, I bet that hurt him!

days before Jan. 6th…the inhabitants pled guilty to Seditious Conspiracy among other crimes. The FBI would have been Derelict in their duty to not investigate all possible collaborators in an attempted overthrow of a legitimate government.

You’re not kidding anyone.

They were convinced - wrongly - that election fraud resulted in a Biden win and were looking at LEGAL ways to challenge the results. Just like Al Gore did in 2000 as Alan Derschowitz, a Gore attorney at the time, pointed out.

But I forgot. Just like you know more about medicine than Baron, Dr. Risch and Dr. Fareed, you know more about the law than Derschowitz. My bad.

i.e. an Anti-American Insurrectionist who welcomes the aid of our worst enemy, Vladimir Putin.

You say yourself that the 2020 election was fairly decided in favor of Joe Biden...Walk your own Talk...Reject Donald Trump, and call for him to be held accountable for his criminal acts leading up to Jan. 6th's Insurrection.

which was started before the election. The "War Room" was real and an integral part of the effort to overthrow that free and fair election of Joe Biden as our President.

Do yourself a favor and read the linked article...also check out a replay of Steve Bannon's podcast where he lays it all out.


Link: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-19/donald-trump-election-denial-2020-presidential-election-2024/104480676

means. Subpoenaed and signed off by a judge. But then again y’all only like judges that rule in MAGA’s failure.

urban rubes don't even know exists (they know it as "Jackson Hole") More crackerjack police work from the pros of the Biden Administration. And, hey, since Democrats alone would hold the presidency and Congress for the rest of time, who in the world would ever find out about this?

(no message)