Red States love Obamacare.
Replies to: Red States love Obamacare.
Blue Cities in Red States.
(no message)
No. Poverty is not confined to cities.
(no message)
Volume. Blue Cities.
(no message)
Poverty is higher in rural areas. Fact.
The data is a little old, but it still holds.
This is not a controversial point among people who know what the hell they are talking about.
Link: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/six-charts-illustrate-divide-rural-urban-america
Condescend elsewhere. Understand Blue City volume. And Blue City poverty.
(no message)
There is a reason why MTG is pushing back on her own party: Her constituents.
Democrats have the winning hand on health care.
Can’t do much with the government shut down.
(no message)
Yes, you are right, and all the experts, data and evidence are wrong!
Try admitting being wrong for one time your life. It might not feel too bad.
GOAT MUST…HAVE….THE…LAST…WORD
(no message)
I see you aren’t a math professor. Condescend elsewhere.
(no message)
I think you two are arguing different things.
Chris is correct that the poverty rate is higher in rural areas. Hensou is right that the number of people is higher in metro areas.
Chris is right that poverty is not confined to the city, Hensou is right that the amount of poor in a city is likely to be larger than the total poor in rural areas.
I don't know that I agree with Hensou that the only reason that red states use Obamacare is because of the blue cities in them, it would be better if we had actual numbers that showed the rates at which rural and metro poor used the service.